259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23275322)
1. Influence of cavity design preparation on stress values in maxillary premolar: a finite element analysis.
Kantardzić I; Vasiljević D; Blazić L; Luzanin O
Croat Med J; 2012 Dec; 53(6):568-76. PubMed ID: 23275322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of the restorative procedure factors on stress values in premolar with MOD cavity: a finite element study.
Kantardžić I; Vasiljević D; Lužanin O; Maravić T; Blažić L
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2018 Oct; 56(10):1875-1886. PubMed ID: 29633113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Finite Element Analysis of the Endodontically-treated Maxillary Premolars restored with Composite Resin along with Glass Fiber Insertion in Various Positions.
Navimipour EJ; Firouzmandi M; Mirhashemi FS
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2015 Apr; 16(4):284-90. PubMed ID: 26067731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Part II: strain measurement and stress distribution.
Soares PV; Santos-Filho PC; Gomide HA; Araujo CA; Martins LR; Soares CJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):114-22. PubMed ID: 18262012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Restorative material and loading type influence on the biomechanical behavior of wedge shaped cervical lesions.
Pereira FA; Zeola LF; de Almeida Milito G; Reis BR; Pereira RD; Soares PV
Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Apr; 20(3):433-41. PubMed ID: 26159778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of two CAD/CAM materials for Nayyar core and post-retained restorations: Three dimensional stress analysis.
Ulusoy N; Gulec Alagoz L
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2021 May; 117():104381. PubMed ID: 33582503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fracture resistance of root filled premolar teeth restored with direct composite resin with or without cusp coverage.
Xie KX; Wang XY; Gao XJ; Yuan CY; Li JX; Chu CH
Int Endod J; 2012 Jun; 45(6):524-9. PubMed ID: 22242600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mechanical interactions of cuspal-coverage designs and cement thickness in a cusp-replacing ceramic premolar restoration: a finite element study.
Chang YH; Lin WH; Kuo WC; Chang CY; Lin CL
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2009 Apr; 47(4):367-74. PubMed ID: 18679734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Multifactorial analysis of an MOD restored human premolar using auto-mesh finite element approach.
Lin CL; Chang CH; Ko CC
J Oral Rehabil; 2001 Jun; 28(6):576-85. PubMed ID: 11422685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cuspal movement and microleakage in premolar teeth restored with posterior filling materials of varying reported volumetric shrinkage values.
Fleming GJ; Hall DP; Shortall AC; Burke FJ
J Dent; 2005 Feb; 33(2):139-46. PubMed ID: 15683895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multi-factorial analysis of a cusp-replacing adhesive premolar restoration: A finite element study.
Lin CL; Chang YH; Liu PR
J Dent; 2008 Mar; 36(3):194-203. PubMed ID: 18221831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of restorative procedures on endodontically treated premolars: Finite element analysis of a CT-scan based three-dimensional model.
Maravić T; Vasiljević D; Kantardžić I; Lainović T; Lužanin O; Blažić L
Dent Mater J; 2018 Jun; 37(3):493-500. PubMed ID: 29593161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of the indirect restoration design on the fracture resistance: a finite element study.
Mei ML; Chen YM; Li H; Chu CH
Biomed Eng Online; 2016 Jan; 15(1):3. PubMed ID: 26758615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effects of cavity-margin-angles and bolus stiffness on the mechanical behavior of indirect resin composite class II restorations.
Ausiello P; Ciaramella S; Garcia-Godoy F; Gloria A; Lanzotti A; Maietta S; Martorelli M
Dent Mater; 2017 Jan; 33(1):e39-e47. PubMed ID: 27890355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. 3D-finite element analyses of cusp movements in a human upper premolar, restored with adhesive resin-based composites.
Ausiello P; Apicella A; Davidson CL; Rengo S
J Biomech; 2001 Oct; 34(10):1269-77. PubMed ID: 11522306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Investigation of polymerisation shrinkage strain, associated cuspal movement and microleakage of MOD cavities restored incrementally with resin-based composite using an LED light curing unit.
Fleming GJ; Khan S; Afzal O; Palin WM; Burke FJ
J Dent; 2007 Feb; 35(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 16842899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cuspal deflection, strain and microleakage of endodontically treated premolar teeth restored with direct resin composites.
Taha NA; Palamara JE; Messer HH
J Dent; 2009 Sep; 37(9):724-30. PubMed ID: 19581032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of occlusal contact and cusp inclination on the biomechanical character of a maxillary premolar: a finite element analysis.
Liu S; Liu Y; Xu J; Rong Q; Pan S
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1238-45. PubMed ID: 24836532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical performance of resin composite on dental tissue restoration: A finite element analysis.
Ouldyerou A; Mehboob H; Mehboob A; Merdji A; Aminallah L; Mukdadi OM; Barsoum I; Junaedi H
PLoS One; 2023; 18(12):e0295582. PubMed ID: 38128035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Premolar cuspal flexure as a function of restorative material and occlusal contact location.
Magne P; Oganesyan T
Quintessence Int; 2009 May; 40(5):363-70. PubMed ID: 19582240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
