These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

599 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23275394)

  • 1. Gaze patterns and audiovisual speech enhancement.
    Yi A; Wong W; Eizenman M
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Apr; 56(2):471-80. PubMed ID: 23275394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of varying talker identity and listening conditions on gaze behavior during audiovisual speech perception.
    Buchan JN; Paré M; Munhall KG
    Brain Res; 2008 Nov; 1242():162-71. PubMed ID: 18621032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Word Learning in Deaf Adults Who Use Cochlear Implants: The Role of Talker Variability and Attention to the Mouth.
    Hartman J; Saffran J; Litovsky R
    Ear Hear; 2024 Mar-Apr 01; 45(2):337-350. PubMed ID: 37695563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Gaze behaviour in audiovisual speech perception: asymmetrical distribution of face-directed fixations.
    Everdell IT; Marsh HO; Yurick MD; Munhall KG; Paré M
    Perception; 2007; 36(10):1535-45. PubMed ID: 18265836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Spatial statistics of gaze fixations during dynamic face processing.
    Buchan JN; Paré M; Munhall KG
    Soc Neurosci; 2007; 2(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 18633803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. You talkin' to me? Communicative talker gaze activates left-lateralized superior temporal cortex during perception of degraded speech.
    McGettigan C; Jasmin K; Eisner F; Agnew ZK; Josephs OJ; Calder AJ; Jessop R; Lawson RP; Spielmann M; Scott SK
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Jun; 100():51-63. PubMed ID: 28400328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of simulated cataracts on speech intelligibility.
    Morris NL; Chaparro A; Downs D; Wood JM
    Vision Res; 2012 Aug; 66():49-54. PubMed ID: 22750022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Visual speech influences speech perception immediately but not automatically.
    Mitterer H; Reinisch E
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Feb; 79(2):660-678. PubMed ID: 27905070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Psychobiological Responses Reveal Audiovisual Noise Differentially Challenges Speech Recognition.
    Bidelman GM; Brown B; Mankel K; Nelms Price C
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(2):268-277. PubMed ID: 31283529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Gaze behavior in audiovisual speech perception: the influence of ocular fixations on the McGurk effect.
    Paré M; Richler RC; ten Hove M; Munhall KG
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 May; 65(4):553-67. PubMed ID: 12812278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A link between individual differences in multisensory speech perception and eye movements.
    Gurler D; Doyle N; Walker E; Magnotti J; Beauchamp M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 May; 77(4):1333-41. PubMed ID: 25810157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Attention to facial regions in segmental and prosodic visual speech perception tasks.
    Lansing CR; McConkie GW
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1999 Jun; 42(3):526-39. PubMed ID: 10391620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visual phonemic ambiguity and speechreading.
    Lidestam B; Beskow J
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Aug; 49(4):835-47. PubMed ID: 16908878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Enhancing speech intelligibility: interactions among context, modality, speech style, and masker.
    Van Engen KJ; Phelps JE; Smiljanic R; Chandrasekaran B
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2014 Oct; 57(5):1908-18. PubMed ID: 24687206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Free viewing of talking faces reveals mouth and eye preferring regions of the human superior temporal sulcus.
    Rennig J; Beauchamp MS
    Neuroimage; 2018 Dec; 183():25-36. PubMed ID: 30092347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Spatial alignment between faces and voices improves selective attention to audio-visual speech.
    Fleming JT; Maddox RK; Shinn-Cunningham BG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Oct; 150(4):3085. PubMed ID: 34717460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Audiovisual perception of congruent and incongruent Dutch front vowels.
    Valkenier B; Duyne JY; Andringa TC; Baskent D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Dec; 55(6):1788-801. PubMed ID: 22992710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validating a Method to Assess Lipreading, Audiovisual Gain, and Integration During Speech Reception With Cochlear-Implanted and Normal-Hearing Subjects Using a Talking Head.
    Schreitmüller S; Frenken M; Bentz L; Ortmann M; Walger M; Meister H
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(3):503-516. PubMed ID: 29068860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. "Look who's talking!" Gaze Patterns for Implicit and Explicit Audio-Visual Speech Synchrony Detection in Children With High-Functioning Autism.
    Grossman RB; Steinhart E; Mitchell T; McIlvane W
    Autism Res; 2015 Jun; 8(3):307-16. PubMed ID: 25620208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cross-modal enhancement of speech detection in young and older adults: does signal content matter?
    Tye-Murray N; Spehar B; Myerson J; Sommers MS; Hale S
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(5):650-5. PubMed ID: 21478751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 30.