These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

595 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23275394)

  • 21. Audio-visual speech perception off the top of the head.
    Davis C; Kim J
    Cognition; 2006 Jul; 100(3):B21-31. PubMed ID: 16289070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Word identification and eye fixation locations in visual and visual-plus-auditory presentations of spoken sentences.
    Lansing CR; McConkie GW
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 May; 65(4):536-52. PubMed ID: 12812277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Hearing speech in noise: seeing a loud talker is better.
    Kim J; Sironic A; Davis C
    Perception; 2011; 40(7):853-62. PubMed ID: 22128557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Audiovisual asynchrony detection and speech intelligibility in noise with moderate to severe sensorineural hearing impairment.
    Başkent D; Bazo D
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(5):582-92. PubMed ID: 21389856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Eye fixations of deaf and hearing observers in simultaneous communication perception.
    De Filippo CL; Lansing CR
    Ear Hear; 2006 Aug; 27(4):331-52. PubMed ID: 16825884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. High visual resolution matters in audiovisual speech perception, but only for some.
    Alsius A; Wayne RV; Paré M; Munhall KG
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Jul; 78(5):1472-87. PubMed ID: 27150616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effect of talker- and listener-related factors on intelligibility for a real-word, open-set perception test.
    Markham D; Hazan V
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Aug; 47(4):725-37. PubMed ID: 15324282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The influence of semantically related and unrelated text cues on the intelligibility of sentences in noise.
    Zekveld AA; Rudner M; Johnsrude IS; Festen JM; van Beek JH; Rönnberg J
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(6):e16-25. PubMed ID: 21826004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Degradation of labial information modifies audiovisual speech perception in cochlear-implanted children.
    Huyse A; Berthommier F; Leybaert J
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):110-21. PubMed ID: 23059850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Pupil dilation uncovers extra listening effort in the presence of a single-talker masker.
    Koelewijn T; Zekveld AA; Festen JM; Kramer SE
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 21921797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Visual Speech Benefit in Clear and Degraded Speech Depends on the Auditory Intelligibility of the Talker and the Number of Background Talkers.
    Blackburn CL; Kitterick PT; Jones G; Sumner CJ; Stacey PC
    Trends Hear; 2019; 23():2331216519837866. PubMed ID: 30909814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Correlation between audio-visual enhancement of speech in different noise environments and SNR: a combined behavioral and electrophysiological study.
    Liu B; Lin Y; Gao X; Dang J
    Neuroscience; 2013 Sep; 247():145-51. PubMed ID: 23673276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Auditory noise increases the allocation of attention to the mouth, and the eyes pay the price: An eye-tracking study.
    Król ME
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0194491. PubMed ID: 29558514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Lip-read me now, hear me better later: cross-modal transfer of talker-familiarity effects.
    Rosenblum LD; Miller RM; Sanchez K
    Psychol Sci; 2007 May; 18(5):392-6. PubMed ID: 17576277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Objective eye-gaze behaviour during face-to-face communication with proficient alaryngeal speakers: a preliminary study.
    Evitts P; Gallop R
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2011; 46(5):535-49. PubMed ID: 21899671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The redeployment of attention to the mouth of a talking face during the second year of life.
    Hillairet de Boisferon A; Tift AH; Minar NJ; Lewkowicz DJ
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2018 Aug; 172():189-200. PubMed ID: 29627481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Divided listening in the free field becomes asymmetric when acoustic cues are limited.
    Fumero MJ; Marrufo-Pérez MI; Eustaquio-Martín A; Lopez-Poveda EA
    Hear Res; 2022 Mar; 416():108444. PubMed ID: 35078133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Audiovisual speech perception in children with developmental language disorder in degraded listening conditions.
    Meronen A; Tiippana K; Westerholm J; Ahonen T
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Feb; 56(1):211-21. PubMed ID: 22653918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Inside bilingualism: Language background modulates selective attention to a talker's mouth.
    Birulés J; Bosch L; Brieke R; Pons F; Lewkowicz DJ
    Dev Sci; 2019 May; 22(3):e12755. PubMed ID: 30251757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effects of cross-language voice training on speech perception: whose familiar voices are more intelligible?
    Levi SV; Winters SJ; Pisoni DB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Dec; 130(6):4053-62. PubMed ID: 22225059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 30.