These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23275414)

  • 1. Age-related changes to spectral voice characteristics affect judgments of prosodic, segmental, and talker attributes for child and adult speech.
    Dilley LC; Wieland EA; Gamache JL; McAuley JD; Redford MA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Feb; 56(1):159-77. PubMed ID: 23275414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of cross-language voice training on speech perception: whose familiar voices are more intelligible?
    Levi SV; Winters SJ; Pisoni DB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Dec; 130(6):4053-62. PubMed ID: 22225059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of age on speech and voice quality ratings.
    Goy H; Kathleen Pichora-Fuller M; van Lieshout P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Apr; 139(4):1648. PubMed ID: 27106312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Acoustic-phonetic correlates of talker intelligibility for adults and children.
    Hazan V; Markham D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Nov; 116(5):3108-18. PubMed ID: 15603156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of noise and talker intelligibility on judgments of accentedness.
    Gittleman S; Van Engen KJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 May; 143(5):3138. PubMed ID: 29857746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Temporal organization of English clear and conversational speech.
    Smiljanić R; Bradlow AR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Nov; 124(5):3171-82. PubMed ID: 19045801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of Spectral Envelope and Fundamental Frequency Shifts on the Perception of Foreign-Accented Speech.
    Kapolowicz MR; Guest DR; Montazeri V; Baese-Berk MM; Assmann PF
    Lang Speech; 2022 Jun; 65(2):418-443. PubMed ID: 34240630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Talker identification across source mechanisms: experiments with laryngeal and electrolarynx speech.
    Perrachione TK; Stepp CE; Hillman RE; Wong PC
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2014 Oct; 57(5):1651-65. PubMed ID: 24801962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Talker-specific learning in speech perception.
    Nygaard LC; Pisoni DB
    Percept Psychophys; 1998 Apr; 60(3):355-76. PubMed ID: 9599989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Familiar Voices Are More Intelligible, Even if They Are Not Recognized as Familiar.
    Holmes E; Domingo Y; Johnsrude IS
    Psychol Sci; 2018 Oct; 29(10):1575-1583. PubMed ID: 30096018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Judgments of Intelligence and Likability of Young Adult Female Speakers of American English: The Influence of Vocal Fry and the Surrounding Acoustic-Prosodic Context.
    Parker MA; Borrie SA
    J Voice; 2018 Sep; 32(5):538-545. PubMed ID: 28958872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of seeing the interlocutor on the production of prosodic contrasts (L).
    Cvejic E; Kim J; Davis C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Feb; 131(2):1011-4. PubMed ID: 22352476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prosodic control in imitative speech of preschool-age children with cochlear implants.
    Lee Y; Sim H
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2020 Jun; 34(6):536-553. PubMed ID: 31507216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Individual talker differences in voice-onset-time.
    Allen JS; Miller JL; DeSteno D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Jan; 113(1):544-52. PubMed ID: 12558290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Making predictable unpredictable with style - Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence for the critical role of prosodic expectations in the perception of prominence in speech.
    Kakouros S; Salminen N; Räsänen O
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Jan; 109():181-199. PubMed ID: 29247667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Talker- and language-specific effects on speech intelligibility in noise assessed with bilingual talkers: Which language is more robust against noise and reverberation?
    Hochmuth S; Jürgens T; Brand T; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():23-34. PubMed ID: 26486466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Acoustic, aerodynamic, and perceptual analyses of the voice of cochlear-implanted children.
    Guerrero Lopez HA; Mondain M; Amy de la Bretèque B; Serrafero P; Trottier C; Barkat-Defradas M
    J Voice; 2013 Jul; 27(4):523.e1-17. PubMed ID: 23809572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Talker differences in clear and conversational speech: vowel intelligibility for normal-hearing listeners.
    Ferguson SH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Oct; 116(4 Pt 1):2365-73. PubMed ID: 15532667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Talker-listener accent interactions in speech-in-noise recognition: effects of prosodic manipulation as a function of language experience.
    Pinet M; Iverson P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Sep; 128(3):1357-65. PubMed ID: 20815470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Factors that can affect divided speech intelligibility.
    Fumero MJ; Marrufo-Pérez MI; Eustaquio-Martín A; Lopez-Poveda EA
    Hear Res; 2024 Jan; 441():108917. PubMed ID: 38061268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.