These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23276115)

  • 1. A window of perception when diverting attention? Enhancing recognition for explicitly presented, unattended, and irrelevant stimuli by target alignment.
    Dewald AD; Sinnett S; Doumas LA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Oct; 39(5):1304-12. PubMed ID: 23276115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Conditions of directed attention inhibit recognition performance for explicitly presented target-aligned irrelevant stimuli.
    Dewald AD; Sinnett S; Doumas LA
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Sep; 138(1):60-7. PubMed ID: 21679910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Word position affects stimulus recognition: evidence for early ERP short-term plastic modulation.
    Spironelli C; Galfano G; Umiltà C; Angrilli A
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2011 Dec; 82(3):217-24. PubMed ID: 21924299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Repetition priming for multisensory stimuli: task-irrelevant and task-relevant stimuli are associated if semantically related but with no advantage over uni-sensory stimuli.
    Hecht D; Reiner M; Karni A
    Brain Res; 2009 Jan; 1251():236-44. PubMed ID: 19022232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ageing and selective inhibition of irrelevant information in an attention-demanding rapid serial visual presentation task.
    Walker ME; Vibell JF; Dewald AD; Sinnett S
    Brain Neurosci Adv; 2022; 6():23982128211073427. PubMed ID: 35097218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Manipulating inattentional blindness within and across sensory modalities.
    Sinnett S; Costa A; Soto-Faraco S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Aug; 59(8):1425-42. PubMed ID: 16846969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Long-lasting effects of briefly flashed words and pseudowords in ultrarapid serial visual presentation.
    Albrecht T; Vorberg D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Sep; 36(5):1339-45. PubMed ID: 20804301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does an instruction to forget enhance memory for other presented items?
    Taylor TL; Fawcett JM
    Conscious Cogn; 2012 Sep; 21(3):1186-97. PubMed ID: 22687390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Inattentional blindness for ignored words: comparison of explicit and implicit memory tasks.
    Butler BC; Klein R
    Conscious Cogn; 2009 Sep; 18(3):811-9. PubMed ID: 19328012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perceptual load interacts with stimulus processing across sensory modalities.
    Klemen J; Büchel C; Rose M
    Eur J Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 29(12):2426-34. PubMed ID: 19490081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. N250r and N400 ERP correlates of immediate famous face repetition are independent of perceptual load.
    Neumann MF; Schweinberger SR
    Brain Res; 2008 Nov; 1239():181-90. PubMed ID: 18793621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Lingering effects of inattention on the recognition of novel forms.
    Becker DV
    Memory; 2009 Aug; 17(6):687-94. PubMed ID: 19585347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perceptual load affects spatial and nonspatial visual selection processes: an event-related brain potential study.
    Barnhardt J; Ritter W; Gomes H
    Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(7):2071-8. PubMed ID: 18355882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Item- and task-level processes in the left inferior prefrontal cortex: positive and negative correlates of encoding.
    Reynolds JR; Donaldson DI; Wagner AD; Braver TS
    Neuroimage; 2004 Apr; 21(4):1472-83. PubMed ID: 15050572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Emotion modulates the effects of endogenous attention on retinotopic visual processing.
    Gomez A; Rothkirch M; Kaul C; Weygandt M; Haynes JD; Rees G; Sterzer P
    Neuroimage; 2011 Aug; 57(4):1542-51. PubMed ID: 21664281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. False item recognition in patients with Alzheimer's disease.
    Abe N; Fujii T; Nishio Y; Iizuka O; Kanno S; Kikuchi H; Takagi M; Hiraoka K; Yamasaki H; Choi H; Hirayama K; Shinohara M; Mori E
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jun; 49(7):1897-902. PubMed ID: 21419789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Memory and cognitive control in task switching.
    Richter FR; Yeung N
    Psychol Sci; 2012 Oct; 23(10):1256-63. PubMed ID: 22972906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Enhancement from targets and suppression from cues in fast task-irrelevant perceptual learning.
    Leclercq V; Seitz AR
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Sep; 141(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 22842471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Got rhythm…for better and for worse. Cross-modal effects of auditory rhythm on visual word recognition.
    Brochard R; Tassin M; Zagar D
    Cognition; 2013 May; 127(2):214-9. PubMed ID: 23454794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing the influence of schematic drawings of body parts on tactile discrimination performance using the crossmodal congruency task.
    Igarashi Y; Kitagawa N; Spence C; Ichihara S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 Feb; 124(2):190-208. PubMed ID: 16759624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.