These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23276545)

  • 1. The BioMotionBot: a robotic device for applications in human motor learning and rehabilitation.
    Bartenbach V; Sander C; Pöschl M; Wilging K; Nelius T; Doll F; Burger W; Stockinger C; Focke A; Stein T
    J Neurosci Methods; 2013 Mar; 213(2):282-97. PubMed ID: 23276545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Real-time haptic-teleoperated robotic system for motor control analysis.
    Shull PB; Gonzalez RV
    J Neurosci Methods; 2006 Mar; 151(2):194-9. PubMed ID: 16153712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. VI.3. Rehabilitation robotics.
    Munih M; Bajd T
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2010; 152():353-66. PubMed ID: 20407204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Neural correlates of motor learning and performance in a virtual ball putting task.
    Pitto L; Novakovic V; Basteris A; Sanguineti V
    IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2011; 2011():5975487. PubMed ID: 22275684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. H-Man: a planar, H-shape cabled differential robotic manipulandum for experiments on human motor control.
    Campolo D; Tommasino P; Gamage K; Klein J; Hughes CM; Masia L
    J Neurosci Methods; 2014 Sep; 235():285-97. PubMed ID: 25058923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A modular planar robotic manipulandum with end-point torque control.
    Howard IS; Ingram JN; Wolpert DM
    J Neurosci Methods; 2009 Jul; 181(2):199-211. PubMed ID: 19450621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A robotic platform to assess, guide and perturb rat forelimb movements.
    Vigaru BC; Lambercy O; Schubring-Giese M; Hosp JA; Schneider M; Osei-Atiemo C; Luft A; Gassert R
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2013 Sep; 21(5):796-805. PubMed ID: 23335672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Motor control and learning in altered dynamic environments.
    Lackner JR; DiZio P
    Curr Opin Neurobiol; 2005 Dec; 15(6):653-9. PubMed ID: 16271464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Motor imagery facilitates force field learning.
    Anwar MN; Tomi N; Ito K
    Brain Res; 2011 Jun; 1395():21-9. PubMed ID: 21555118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impedance learning for robotic contact tasks using natural actor-critic algorithm.
    Kim B; Park J; Park S; Kang S
    IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern; 2010 Apr; 40(2):433-43. PubMed ID: 19696001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A robotic model to investigate human motor control.
    Lenzi T; Vitiello N; McIntyre J; Roccella S; Carrozza MC
    Biol Cybern; 2011 Jul; 105(1):1-19. PubMed ID: 21769741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Towards functional robotic training: motor learning of dynamic tasks is enhanced by haptic rendering but hampered by arm weight support.
    Özen Ö; Buetler KA; Marchal-Crespo L
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2022 Feb; 19(1):19. PubMed ID: 35152897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Towards a modified consumer haptic device for robotic-assisted fine-motor repetitive motion training.
    Palsbo SE; Marr D; Streng T; Bay BK; Norblad AW
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2011; 6(6):546-51. PubMed ID: 21091135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perceptual limits for a robotic rehabilitation environment using visual feedback distortion.
    Brewer BR; Fagan M; Klatzky RL; Matsuoka Y
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2005 Mar; 13(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 15813400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Teleoperation for a ball-catching task with significant dynamics.
    Smith C; Bratt M; Christensen HI
    Neural Netw; 2008 May; 21(4):604-20. PubMed ID: 18490137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of robotic guidance on different types of motor timing.
    Lüttgen J; Heuer H
    J Mot Behav; 2013; 45(3):249-58. PubMed ID: 23663189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sub-processes of motor learning revealed by a robotic manipulandum for rodents.
    Lambercy O; Schubring-Giese M; Vigaru B; Gassert R; Luft AR; Hosp JA
    Behav Brain Res; 2015 Feb; 278():569-76. PubMed ID: 25446755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Robot-enhanced motor learning: accelerating internal model formation during locomotion by transient dynamic amplification.
    Emken JL; Reinkensmeyer DJ
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2005 Mar; 13(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 15813404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Robotic guidance induces long-lasting changes in the movement pattern of a novel sport-specific motor task.
    Kümmel J; Kramer A; Gruber M
    Hum Mov Sci; 2014 Dec; 38():23-33. PubMed ID: 25238621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.