BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23277827)

  • 1. Clinical results of localized alveolar ridge augmentation with bone grafts harvested from symphysis in comparison with ramus.
    Pourabbas R; Nezafati S
    J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects; 2007; 1(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 23277827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical results of alveolar ridge augmentation with mandibular block bone grafts in partially edentulous patients prior to implant placement.
    Cordaro L; Amadé DS; Cordaro M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2002 Feb; 13(1):103-11. PubMed ID: 12005140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ramus or chin grafts for maxillary sinus inlay and local onlay augmentation: comparison of donor site morbidity and complications.
    Clavero J; Lundgren S
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2003; 5(3):154-60. PubMed ID: 14575631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical results of autologous bone augmentation harvested from the mandibular ramus prior to implant placement. An analysis of 104 cases.
    Sakkas A; Ioannis K; Winter K; Schramm A; Wilde F
    GMS Interdiscip Plast Reconstr Surg DGPW; 2016; 5():Doc21. PubMed ID: 27785390
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Clinical effects of ridge augmentation with the half-columnar shaped mandibular bone block for the placement of dental implants].
    Tang ZH; Lv H; Cao MX; Wu MJ
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2010 Feb; 42(1):94-7. PubMed ID: 20140053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Autogenous bone grafts in oral implantology-is it still a "gold standard"? A consecutive review of 279 patients with 456 clinical procedures.
    Sakkas A; Wilde F; Heufelder M; Winter K; Schramm A
    Int J Implant Dent; 2017 Dec; 3(1):23. PubMed ID: 28573552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [The use of autogenous block graft for augmentation of the atrophic alveolar ridge].
    Kahn A; Shlomi B; Levy Y; Better H; Chaushu G
    Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993); 2003 Jul; 20(3):54-64, 102. PubMed ID: 14515629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Autogenous interpositional block graft vs onlay graft for horizontal ridge augmentation in the mandible.
    Atef M; Osman AH; Hakam M
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2019 Aug; 21(4):678-685. PubMed ID: 31260166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Autogenous Inlay Graft vs Autogenous Onlay Graft for Anterior Maxillary Horizontal Ridge Augmentation: A Randomized Control Clinical Study.
    Elsayed AO; Abdel-Rahman FH; Ahmed WM; Tawfik MA
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2024 Feb; 25(2):107-113. PubMed ID: 38514406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Maxillary tuberosity block bone graft: innovative technique and case report.
    Tolstunov L
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1723-9. PubMed ID: 19615588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Lateral Ridge Augmentation Using Autogenous Block Grafts and Guided Bone Regeneration: A 10-Year Prospective Case Series Study.
    Chappuis V; Cavusoglu Y; Buser D; von Arx T
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2017 Feb; 19(1):85-96. PubMed ID: 27476677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mandibular Block Graft for Localised Ridge Augmentation Followed by Delayed Implant Placement: A Case Report.
    Ghodpage P; Suroshe A
    Cureus; 2023 Feb; 15(2):e34881. PubMed ID: 36925988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Horizontal ridge augmentation using autogenous block grafts and the guided bone regeneration technique with collagen membranes: a clinical study with 42 patients.
    von Arx T; Buser D
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Aug; 17(4):359-66. PubMed ID: 16907765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Vertical alveolar ridge augmentation by means of a titanium mesh and autogenous bone grafts.
    Roccuzzo M; Ramieri G; Spada MC; Bianchi SD; Berrone S
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Feb; 15(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 14731180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Resorbable screw fixation for cortical onlay bone grafting: a pilot study with preliminary results.
    Quereshy FA; Dhaliwal HS; El SA; Horan MP; Dhaliwal SS
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Oct; 68(10):2497-502. PubMed ID: 20863941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Implant Treatment after Sagittal Splitting Ramus Osteotomy and Alveolar Ridge Augmentation in Patient with Mandibular Prognathism and Multiple Missing Maxillary Teeth.
    Furuya Y; Yamamoto M; Ito T; Takaki T; Shibahara T; Yajima Y
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 2018 Nov; 59(4):285-290. PubMed ID: 30333374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ridge augmentation using mandibular ramus bone grafts for the placement of dental implants: presentation of a technique.
    Misch CM
    Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent; 1996 Mar; 8(2):127-35; quiz 138. PubMed ID: 9028286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The use of ramus autogenous block grafts for vertical alveolar ridge augmentation and implant placement: a pilot study.
    Proussaefs P; Lozada J; Kleinman A; Rohrer MD
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(2):238-48. PubMed ID: 11958407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of autogenous harvest site location on the outcome of ridge augmentation for implant dehiscences.
    Veis AA; Tsirlis AT; Parisis NA
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2004 Apr; 24(2):155-63. PubMed ID: 15119886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Staged horizontal bone augmentation for dental implants in aesthetic zones: A prospective randomized controlled clinical trial comparing a half-columnar bone block harvested from the ramus versus a rectangular bone block from the symphysis.
    Zhao X; Zou L; Chen Y; Tang Z
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Oct; 49(10):1326-1334. PubMed ID: 32273165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.