These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
8. Periodontal assessment by right- and left-handed examiners: is there a difference? Khan SM; Blanchard SB; Dowsett SA; Eckert GJ; Kowolik MJ J Periodontol; 2006 Jul; 77(7):1099-103. PubMed ID: 16805670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reproducibility of Manual Periodontal Probing Following a Comprehensive Standardization and Calibration Training Program. Fitzgerald BP; Hawley CE; Harrold CQ; Garrett JS; Polson AM; Rams TE J Oral Biol (Northborough); 2022 Jun; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 36225716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of probing attachment levels using a CEJ probe versus traditional probes. Karpinia K; Magnusson I; Gibbs C; Yang MC J Clin Periodontol; 2004 Mar; 31(3):173-6. PubMed ID: 15016020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In-vitro accuracy and reproducibility evaluation of probing depth measurements of selected periodontal probes. Al Shayeb KN; Turner W; Gillam DG Saudi Dent J; 2014 Jan; 26(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 24526824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of measurement variability in subjects with moderate periodontitis using a conventional and constant force periodontal probe. Osborn JB; Stoltenberg JL; Huso BA; Aeppli DM; Pihlstrom BL J Periodontol; 1992 Apr; 63(4):283-9. PubMed ID: 1573541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of measurement variability using a standard and constant force periodontal probe. Osborn J; Stoltenberg J; Huso B; Aeppli D; Pihlstrom B J Periodontol; 1990 Aug; 61(8):497-503. PubMed ID: 2391627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative evaluation of probing depth and clinical attachment level using a manual probe and Florida probe. Kour A; Kumar A; Puri K; Khatri M; Bansal M; Gupta G J Indian Soc Periodontol; 2016; 20(3):299-306. PubMed ID: 27563204 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Variables affecting the inter- and intra-examiner reliability of ICDAS for occlusal caries diagnosis in permanent molars. Qudeimat MA; Alomari QD; Altarakemah Y; Alshawaf N; Honkala EJ J Public Health Dent; 2016; 76(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 26095924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of clinical experience on the accuracy of probing depth measurements. Seabra RC; Costa FO; Costa JE; Van Dyke T; Soares RV Quintessence Int; 2008; 39(7):559-65. PubMed ID: 19107263 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In vitro performance of DIAGNOdent laser fluorescence device for dental calculus detection on human tooth root surfaces. Rams TE; Alwaqyan AY Saudi Dent J; 2017 Oct; 29(4):171-178. PubMed ID: 29033528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Level of patient comfort and measurement reproducibility of three different probes: A cross-sectional study. Flores-Rodrigo D; Meza-Mauricio J; Retamal-Valdes B; Mayta-Tovalino F; Mendoza-Azpur G Int J Dent Hyg; 2022 May; 20(2):301-307. PubMed ID: 34390316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]