These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23277847)
1. Cephalometric Evaluation of Dentofacial Features of Class III Malocclusion in Adults of Mashhad, Iran. Ramezanzadeh B; Pousti M; Bagheri M J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects; 2007; 1(3):125-30. PubMed ID: 23277847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cephalometric evaluation of craniofacial pattern of Syrian children with Class III malocclusion. Mouakeh M Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Jun; 119(6):640-9. PubMed ID: 11395709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Components of Adult Class III Malocclusion in an Iranian Population. Koodaryan R; Rafighi A; Hafezeqoran A J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects; 2009; 3(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 23230476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of treatment outcomes between skeletal anchorage and extraoral anchorage in adults with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion. Yao CC; Lai EH; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):615-24. PubMed ID: 18984393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Distribution of Various Maxilla-Mandibular Positions and Cephalometric Comparison in Chinese Skeletal Class II Malocclusions. Xiong X; Huang Y; Liu W; Wu Y; Yi Y; Wang J J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Aug; 21(8):822-828. PubMed ID: 33568599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Class III malocclusion: a cephalometric study of Saudi Arabians. Toms AP Br J Orthod; 1989 Aug; 16(3):201-6. PubMed ID: 2765469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Molar heights and incisor inclinations in adults with Class II and Class III skeletal open-bite malocclusions. Arriola-Guillén LE; Flores-Mir C Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Mar; 145(3):325-32. PubMed ID: 24582024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Longitudinal observation of mandibular motion pattern in patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion subsequent to orthognathic surgery. Wen-Ching Ko E; Huang CS; Lo LJ; Chen YR J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Feb; 70(2):e158-68. PubMed ID: 22260918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of Glenoid Fossa Position in Class II Malocclusion Associated with Mandibular Retrusion and Class III Malocclusion Associated with Mandibular Protrusion. Chandrika PS; Alla R; Duddu Y; Adarsh K; Varma PK; Mandava P J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2024 Feb; 16(Suppl 1):S349-S352. PubMed ID: 38595524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Class II treatment in adults: comparing camouflage orthodontics, dentofacial orthopedics and orthognathic surgery--a cephalometric study to evaluate various therapeutic effects. Kinzinger G; Frye L; Diedrich P J Orofac Orthop; 2009 Jan; 70(1):63-91. PubMed ID: 19194676 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A cephalometric evaluation of patients presenting with persistent digit sucking habits. Moore MB; McDonald JP Br J Orthod; 1997 Feb; 24(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 9088599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of maxillary protraction for early correction of class III malocclusion. Celikoglu M; Oktay H Eur J Orthod; 2014 Feb; 36(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 23460730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dentoskeletal morphology in adults with Class I, Class II Division 1, or Class II Division 2 malocclusion with increased overbite. Uzuner FD; Aslan BI; Dinçer M Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Aug; 156(2):248-256.e2. PubMed ID: 31375235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Soft and hard tissue changes after bimaxillary surgery in Turkish female Class III patients. Marşan G; Cura N; Emekli U J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 37(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 18786833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Analysis of the discrepancy of crown-root morphology of central incisors among different skeletal malocclusion using cone-beam CT]. Wang XM; Wang J; Zou M; Zheng J; Xue H Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Feb; 54(2):101-106. PubMed ID: 30695911 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Treatment outcomes of various force applications in growing patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion. Lim LI; Choi JY; Ahn HW; Kim SH; Chung KR; Nelson G Angle Orthod; 2021 Jul; 91(4):449-458. PubMed ID: 33587106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Changes in anteroposterior position and inclination of the maxillary incisors after surgical-orthodontic treatment of skeletal class III malocclusions. Zou B; Zhou Y; Lowe AA; Li H; Pliska B J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Dec; 43(10):1986-93. PubMed ID: 26439521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the collum angle of incisors and canines in skeletal malocclusions - A CBCT study. Elangovan B; Srinivasan B; Kailasam V; Padmanabhan S Int Orthod; 2020 Sep; 18(3):468-479. PubMed ID: 32800523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The crown-root morphology of central incisors in different skeletal malocclusions assessed with cone-beam computed tomography. Wang XM; Ma LZ; Wang J; Xue H Prog Orthod; 2019 May; 20(1):20. PubMed ID: 31111270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cephalometric differentiation between vertical and horizontal malocclusions in 122 Europeans using the Denture Frame Analysis and standard measurements. Differentiation between vertical and horizontal malocclusion. Celar AG; Freudenthaler JW; Schneider B J Orofac Orthop; 1999; 60(3):195-204. PubMed ID: 10394213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]