These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23277847)

  • 21. Cephalometric differentiation between vertical and horizontal malocclusions in 122 Europeans using the Denture Frame Analysis and standard measurements. Differentiation between vertical and horizontal malocclusion.
    Celar AG; Freudenthaler JW; Schneider B
    J Orofac Orthop; 1999; 60(3):195-204. PubMed ID: 10394213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Longitudinal cephalometric growth of untreated subjects with Class II Division 2 malocclusion.
    Barbosa LAG; Araujo E; Behrents RG; Buschang PH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 May; 151(5):914-920. PubMed ID: 28457269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Association between incisor positions and amount of interdental stripping in patients undergoing orthodontic treatment.
    Ozturk T; Yagci A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Jun; 159(6):e439-e448. PubMed ID: 33678467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effects of the reciprocal mini-chin cup appliance.
    Aslan BI; Dinçer M
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Feb; 30(1):80-8. PubMed ID: 18276929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Cephalometric analysis of the middle part of the face in patients with mandibular prognathism.
    Cutović Tatjana ; Jović N; Kozomara R; Radojicić J; Janosević M; Mladenović I; Matijević S
    Vojnosanit Pregl; 2014 Nov; 71(11):1026-33. PubMed ID: 25536805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The extraction of permanent second molars and its effect on the dentofacial complex of patients treated with the Tip-Edge appliance.
    Greatrex PA; Sampson WJ; Richards LC; Twelftree CC
    Eur J Orthod; 2002 Oct; 24(5):501-18. PubMed ID: 12407946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Variation in dentofacial morphology and occlusion in juvenile idiopathic arthritis subjects: a case-control study.
    Hu Y; Billiau AD; Verdonck A; Wouters C; Carels C
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Feb; 31(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 19164412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Dentoalveolar compensation according to skeletal discrepancy and overjet in skeletal Class III patients.
    Kim SJ; Kim KH; Yu HS; Baik HS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Mar; 145(3):317-24. PubMed ID: 24582023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Skeletal, dental and soft tissue changes in postural class III malocclusion treated with a maxillary removable appliance.
    Alhaija ES
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2006; 31(2):149-52. PubMed ID: 17315814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Orthodontic camouflage versus orthognathic surgery for class III deformity: comparative cephalometric analysis.
    Martinez P; Bellot-Arcís C; Llamas JM; Cibrian R; Gandia JL; Paredes-Gallardo V
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Apr; 46(4):490-495. PubMed ID: 28034574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Non-extraction treatment in borderline class III malocclusion].
    Chen LL; You QL; Yang YM
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2011 Feb; 20(1):82-7. PubMed ID: 21451905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Cephalometric outcomes of a new orthopaedic appliance for Class III malocclusion treatment.
    Martina R; D'Antò V; De Simone V; Galeotti A; Rongo R; Franchi L
    Eur J Orthod; 2020 Apr; 42(2):187-192. PubMed ID: 31314883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of 2 comprehensive Class II treatment protocols including the bonded Herbst and headgear appliances: a double-blind study of consecutively treated patients at puberty.
    Baccetti T; Franchi L; Stahl F
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jun; 135(6):698.e1-10; discussion 698-9. PubMed ID: 19524823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Relationship between dental crowding, skeletal base lengths, and dentofacial measurements.
    Montasser MA; Taha M
    Prog Orthod; 2012 Nov; 13(3):281-7. PubMed ID: 23260539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Dentofacial effects of skeletal anchored treatment modalities for the correction of maxillary retrognathia.
    Sar C; Sahinoğlu Z; Özçirpici AA; Uçkan S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jan; 145(1):41-54. PubMed ID: 24373654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Maxillary and mandibular contribution to the establishment of class II malocclusion in an adult Lebanese population.
    El Hajj N; Bassil-Nassif N; Tauk A; Mouhanna-Fattal C; Bouserhal JP
    Int Orthod; 2017 Dec; 15(4):677-697. PubMed ID: 29113846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Classification and characterization of class III malocclusion in Chinese individuals.
    Li C; Cai Y; Chen S; Chen F
    Head Face Med; 2016 Nov; 12(1):31. PubMed ID: 27821165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Cone-beam CT study for the oropharyngeal airway volume and hyoid position of adults Class III skeletal malocclusion].
    Li ZM; Wu J; Men HY; Li HF
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2015 Jun; 24(3):351-5. PubMed ID: 26166528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Dental and facial skeletal characteristics and growth of females and males with Class II Division 1 malocclusion between the ages of 10 and 14 (revisited). Part II. Anteroposterior and vertical circumpubertal growth.
    Rothstein T; Phan XL
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Nov; 120(5):542-55. PubMed ID: 11709673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Relationship between skeletal Class II and Class III malocclusions with vertical skeletal pattern.
    Plaza SP; Reimpell A; Silva J; Montoya D
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2019 Sep; 24(4):63-72. PubMed ID: 31508708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.