403 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23278132)
1. Photoepilation with a diode laser vs. intense pulsed light: a randomized, intrapatient left-to-right trial.
Klein A; Steinert S; Baeumler W; Landthaler M; Babilas P
Br J Dermatol; 2013 Jun; 168(6):1287-93. PubMed ID: 23278132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fixed, low radiant exposure vs. incremental radiant exposure approach for diode laser hair reduction: a randomized, split axilla, comparative single-blinded trial.
Pavlović MD; Adamič M; Nenadić D
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2015 Dec; 29(12):2377-81. PubMed ID: 26299540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the effect of diode laser versus intense pulsed light in axillary hair removal.
Ormiga P; Ishida CE; Boechat A; Ramos-E-Silva M
Dermatol Surg; 2014 Oct; 40(10):1061-9. PubMed ID: 25229781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Long-pulsed Nd:YAG laser vs. intense pulsed light for hair removal in dark skin: a randomized controlled trial.
Ismail SA
Br J Dermatol; 2012 Feb; 166(2):317-21. PubMed ID: 21999492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of hair reduction with three lasers and light sources: prospective, blinded and controlled study.
Sochor M; Curkova AK; Schwarczova Z; Sochorova R; Simaljakova M; Buchvald J
J Cosmet Laser Ther; 2011 Oct; 13(5):210-5. PubMed ID: 21932934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A split-face comparison of facial hair removal with the long-pulsed alexandrite laser and intense pulsed light system.
Al-Dhalimi MA; Kadhum MJ
J Cosmet Laser Ther; 2015; 17(5):267-72. PubMed ID: 25803567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Long-term clinical evaluation of a 800-nm long-pulsed diode laser with a large spot size and vacuum-assisted suction for hair removal.
Ibrahimi OA; Kilmer SL
Dermatol Surg; 2012 Jun; 38(6):912-7. PubMed ID: 22455549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Adjuvant eflornithine to maintain IPL-induced hair reduction in women with facial hirsutism: a randomized controlled trial.
Vissing AC; Taudorf EH; Haak CS; Philipsen PA; Haedersdal M
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2016 Feb; 30(2):314-9. PubMed ID: 26507926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Within-patient right-left blinded comparison of diode (810 nm) laser therapy and intense pulsed light therapy for hair removal.
Cameron H; Ibbotson SH; Dawe RS; Ferguson J; Moseley H
Lasers Med Sci; 2008 Oct; 23(4):393-7. PubMed ID: 18038179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Split-leg comparison of low fluence diode laser and high fluence intense pulsed light in permanent hair reduction in skin types III to IV.
Chen J; Liu XJ; Huo MH
Australas J Dermatol; 2012 Aug; 53(3):186-9. PubMed ID: 22881465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Long-term efficacy of linear-scanning 808 nm diode laser for hair removal compared to a scanned alexandrite laser.
Grunewald S; Bodendorf MO; Zygouris A; Simon JC; Paasch U
Lasers Surg Med; 2014 Jan; 46(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 24127195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of hair removal efficacy and side effect of neodymium:Yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser and intense pulsed light systems (18-month follow-up).
Szima GZ; Janka EA; Kovács A; Bortély B; Bodnár E; Sawhney I; Szabó É; Remenyik É
J Cosmet Dermatol; 2017 Jun; 16(2):193-198. PubMed ID: 28164458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of long-pulsed alexandrite and Nd:YAG lasers, individually and in combination, for leg hair reduction: an assessor-blinded, randomized trial with 18 months of follow-up.
Davoudi SM; Behnia F; Gorouhi F; Keshavarz S; Nassiri Kashani M; Rashighi Firoozabadi M; Firooz A
Arch Dermatol; 2008 Oct; 144(10):1323-7. PubMed ID: 18936396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Long-term Comparison of a Large Spot Vacuum Assisted Handpiece vs the Small Spot Size Traditional Handpiece of the 800 nm Diode Laser.
Youssef NJ; Rizk AG; Ibrahimi OA; Tannous ZS
J Drugs Dermatol; 2017 Sep; 16(9):893-898. PubMed ID: 28915284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Long-pulsed dye laser versus intense pulsed light for photodamaged skin: a randomized split-face trial with blinded response evaluation.
Jørgensen GF; Hedelund L; Haedersdal M
Lasers Surg Med; 2008 Jul; 40(5):293-9. PubMed ID: 18563775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of two 810 diode lasers for hair removal: low fluence, multiple pass versus a high fluence, single pass technique.
Koo B; Ball K; Tremaine AM; Zachary CB
Lasers Surg Med; 2014 Apr; 46(4):270-4. PubMed ID: 24752608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evidence-based review of hair removal using lasers and light sources.
Haedersdal M; Wulf HC
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2006 Jan; 20(1):9-20. PubMed ID: 16405602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intense pulsed light vs. long-pulsed dye laser treatment of telangiectasia after radiotherapy for breast cancer: a randomized split-lesion trial of two different treatments.
Nymann P; Hedelund L; Haedersdal M
Br J Dermatol; 2009 Jun; 160(6):1237-41. PubMed ID: 19309367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Paradoxical hypertrichosis and terminal hair change after intense pulsed light hair removal therapy.
Radmanesh M
J Dermatolog Treat; 2009; 20(1):52-4. PubMed ID: 18629677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Hair removal using a new intense pulsed light source in Chinese patients.
Feng YM; Zhou ZC; Gold MH
J Cosmet Laser Ther; 2009 Jun; 11(2):94-7. PubMed ID: 19337941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
