These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23279405)

  • 21. Inter-examiner agreement in clinical evaluation.
    Reubenson A; Schnepf T; Waller R; Edmondston S
    Clin Teach; 2012 Apr; 9(2):119-22. PubMed ID: 22405367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The correlation of student performance in preclinical and clinical prosthodontic assessments.
    Curtis DA; Lind SL; Brear S; Finzen FC
    J Dent Educ; 2007 Mar; 71(3):365-72. PubMed ID: 17389571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Grading dental students in a "nongraded" clinical assessment program.
    Taleghani M; Solomon ES; Wathen WF
    J Dent Educ; 2006 May; 70(5):500-10. PubMed ID: 16687634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Team-based assessment of medical students in a clinical clerkship is feasible and acceptable.
    Sharma N; Cui Y; Leighton JP; White JS
    Med Teach; 2012; 34(7):555-61. PubMed ID: 22746962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Typodont versus live patient: predicting dental students' clinical performance.
    Nunez DW; Taleghani M; Wathen WF; Abdellatif HM
    J Dent Educ; 2012 Apr; 76(4):407-13. PubMed ID: 22473552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Factors that might undermine the validity of patient and multi-source feedback.
    Archer JC; McAvoy P
    Med Educ; 2011 Sep; 45(9):886-93. PubMed ID: 21848716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Assessing the clinical competence of dental students].
    Schoonheim-Klein ME; van Selms MK; Volgenant CM; Wiegman HP; Vervoorn JM
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2012 Jun; 119(6):328-36. PubMed ID: 22812273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Rubrics 101: a primer for rubric development in dental education.
    O'Donnell JA; Oakley M; Haney S; O'Neill PN; Taylor D
    J Dent Educ; 2011 Sep; 75(9):1163-75. PubMed ID: 21890846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of student self-assessment with faculty assessment of clinical competence.
    Root Kustritz MV; Molgaard LK; Rendahl A
    J Vet Med Educ; 2011; 38(2):163-70. PubMed ID: 22023925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Aligning clinical assessment with course elements in prosthodontic dentistry: a South African case.
    Maart RD; Bitzer EM
    J Dent Educ; 2013 Sep; 77(9):1129-39. PubMed ID: 24002850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Development of a structured clinical operative test (SCOT) in the assessment of practical ability in the oral surgery undergraduate curriculum.
    Macluskey M; Hanson C; Kershaw A; Wight AJ; Ogden GR
    Br Dent J; 2004 Feb; 196(4):225-8. PubMed ID: 15039733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Inter- and Intrarater Reliability Using Different Software Versions of E4D Compare in Dental Education.
    Callan RS; Cooper JR; Young NB; Mollica AG; Furness AR; Looney SW
    J Dent Educ; 2015 Jun; 79(6):711-8. PubMed ID: 26034037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Designing evaluation forms to facilitate student learning.
    Licari FW; Knight GW; Guenzel PJ
    J Dent Educ; 2008 Jan; 72(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 18172235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Peer-led training and assessment in basic life support for healthcare students: synthesis of literature review and fifteen years practical experience.
    Harvey PR; Higenbottam CV; Owen A; Hulme J; Bion JF
    Resuscitation; 2012 Jul; 83(7):894-9. PubMed ID: 22285723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Clinical skills assessment: comparison of student and examiner assessment in an objective structured clinical examination.
    Jahan F; Sadaf S; Bhanji S; Naeem N; Qureshi R
    Educ Health (Abingdon); 2011 Aug; 24(2):421. PubMed ID: 22081647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The use of objective structured self-assessment and peer-feedback (OSSP) for learning communication skills: evaluation using a controlled trial.
    Perera J; Mohamadou G; Kaur S
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2010 May; 15(2):185-93. PubMed ID: 19757129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The effectiveness and reliability of peer-marking in first-year medical students.
    English R; Brookes ST; Avery K; Blazeby JM; Ben-Shlomo Y
    Med Educ; 2006 Oct; 40(10):965-72. PubMed ID: 16987186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Examining the role of collaborative assessment in a didactic dental hygiene course.
    Keselyak NT; Saylor CD; Simmer-Beck M; Bray KK
    J Dent Educ; 2009 Aug; 73(8):980-90. PubMed ID: 19648569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Is the OSCE more stressful? Examination anxiety and its consequences in different assessment methods in dental education.
    Brand HS; Schoonheim-Klein M
    Eur J Dent Educ; 2009 Aug; 13(3):147-53. PubMed ID: 19630933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Development, application and effectiveness of a novel logbook checklist assessment scheme in conservative dentistry.
    Chadwick RG; Mason AG
    Eur J Dent Educ; 1997 Nov; 1(4):176-80. PubMed ID: 9516288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.