BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23279703)

  • 1. Twenty-four-hour measurement of IOP in rabbits using rebound tonometer.
    Wang X; Dong J; Wu Q
    Vet Ophthalmol; 2013 Nov; 16(6):423-8. PubMed ID: 23279703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Non-invasive determination of intraocular pressure in the rat eye. Comparison of an electronic tonometer (TonoPen), and a rebound (impact probe) tonometer.
    Goldblum D; Kontiola AI; Mittag T; Chen B; Danias J
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2002 Nov; 240(11):942-6. PubMed ID: 12486518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of a rebound and an applanation tonometer for measuring intraocular pressure in normal rabbits.
    Pereira FQ; Bercht BS; Soares MG; da Mota MG; Pigatto JA
    Vet Ophthalmol; 2011 Sep; 14(5):321-6. PubMed ID: 21929609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of rebound and applanation tonometry in the management of patients treated for glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
    Rehnman JB; Martin L
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2008 Jul; 28(4):382-6. PubMed ID: 18565094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Comparison of I Care rebound tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer after Descemet's stripping with automated endothelium keratoplasty].
    Li BZ; Hong J; Peng RM; Wang X; Ren J; Wu LL
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Mar; 49(3):257-62. PubMed ID: 23866708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of intraocular pressure in conscious ferrets (Mustela putorius furo) by means of rebound tonometry and comparison with applanation tonometry.
    Di Girolamo N; Andreani V; Guandalini A; Selleri P
    Vet Rec; 2013 Apr; 172(15):396. PubMed ID: 23486504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements and assessment of intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility with the portable ICare rebound tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer in glaucoma patients.
    Salim S; Du H; Wan J
    J Glaucoma; 2013; 22(4):325-9. PubMed ID: 23542696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of the rebound tonometer (ICare) to the applanation tonometer (Tonopen XL) in normotensive dogs.
    Leiva M; Naranjo C; Peña MT
    Vet Ophthalmol; 2006; 9(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 16409240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of invasive and non-invasive tonometry in the mouse.
    Morris CA; Crowston JG; Lindsey JD; Danias J; Weinreb RN
    Exp Eye Res; 2006 Jun; 82(6):1094-9. PubMed ID: 16466714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical evaluation of rebound tonometer.
    Davies LN; Bartlett H; Mallen EA; Wolffsohn JS
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2006 Apr; 84(2):206-9. PubMed ID: 16637838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validation of rebound tonometry for intraocular pressure measurement in the rabbit.
    Zhang H; Yang D; Ross CM; Wigg JP; Pandav S; Crowston JG
    Exp Eye Res; 2014 Apr; 121():86-93. PubMed ID: 24561115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of a rebound tonometer (Tonovet) in clinically normal cat eyes.
    Rusanen E; Florin M; Hässig M; Spiess BM
    Vet Ophthalmol; 2010 Jan; 13(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 20149173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements using rebound (TonoVet
    McDonald JE; Knollinger AM; Dustin Dees D; MacLaren NE
    Vet Ophthalmol; 2017 Mar; 20(2):155-159. PubMed ID: 27111099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of the ICare rebound tonometer with the Goldmann tonometer in a normal population.
    Fernandes P; Díaz-Rey JA; Queirós A; Gonzalez-Meijome JM; Jorge J
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2005 Sep; 25(5):436-40. PubMed ID: 16101950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of the new rebound tonometer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in a clinical setting.
    Kim KN; Jeoung JW; Park KH; Yang MK; Kim DM
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2013 Aug; 91(5):e392-6. PubMed ID: 23521889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reproducibility and tolerability of the ICare rebound tonometer in school children.
    Sahin A; Basmak H; Niyaz L; Yildirim N
    J Glaucoma; 2007 Mar; 16(2):185-8. PubMed ID: 17473727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of body position on intraocular pressure in calves.
    Kurt B; Çağatay HH; Aksoy Ö
    J S Afr Vet Assoc; 2018 Aug; 89(0):e1-e3. PubMed ID: 30198297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Twenty-four-Hour Measurement of Intraocular Pressure in Guinea Pigs (Cavia porcellus).
    Ansari-Mood M; Mehdi-Rajaei S; Sadjadi R; Selk-Ghaffari M; Williams DL
    J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci; 2016 Jan; 55(1):95-7. PubMed ID: 26817986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of intraocular pressure in New Zealand White rabbits measured using rebound and applanation tonometers and four different methods of physical restraint.
    Okur S; Yanmaz LE; Senocak MG; Ersöz U; Gölgeli A; Turgut F; Orhun OT; Kocaman Y
    N Z Vet J; 2023 Sep; 71(5):251-258. PubMed ID: 37306141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of sleeping in a head-up position on intraocular pressure in patients with glaucoma.
    Buys YM; Alasbali T; Jin YP; Smith M; Gouws P; Geffen N; Flanagan JG; Shapiro CM; Trope GE
    Ophthalmology; 2010 Jul; 117(7):1348-51. PubMed ID: 20188421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.