141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23279817)
1. A novel derivation of a within-batch sampling plan based on a Poisson-gamma model characterising low microbial counts in foods.
Gonzales-Barron U; Zwietering MH; Butler F
Int J Food Microbiol; 2013 Feb; 161(2):84-96. PubMed ID: 23279817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Usefulness of indicator bacteria as potential marker of Campylobacter contamination in broiler carcasses.
Roccato A; Mancin M; Barco L; Cibin V; Antonello K; Cocola F; Ricci A
Int J Food Microbiol; 2018 Jul; 276():63-70. PubMed ID: 29674142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Modelling the effect of chilling on the occurrence of Salmonella on pig carcasses at study, abattoir and batch levels by meta-analysis.
Gonzales-Barron U; Cadavez V; Sheridan JJ; Butler F
Int J Food Microbiol; 2013 May; 163(2-3):101-13. PubMed ID: 23558193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Actual distribution of Cronobacter spp. in industrial batches of powdered infant formula and consequences for performance of sampling strategies.
Jongenburger I; Reij MW; Boer EP; Gorris LG; Zwietering MH
Int J Food Microbiol; 2011 Nov; 151(1):62-9. PubMed ID: 21893361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Model approach to estimate the probability of accepting a lot of heterogeneously contaminated powdered food using different sampling strategies.
Valero A; Pasquali F; De Cesare A; Manfreda G
Int J Food Microbiol; 2014 Aug; 184():35-8. PubMed ID: 24462218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Microbiological sampling of swine carcasses: a comparison of data obtained by swabbing with medical gauze and data collected routinely by excision at Swedish abattoirs.
Lindblad M
Int J Food Microbiol; 2007 Sep; 118(2):180-5. PubMed ID: 17706823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of hygienic treatments during slaughtering on microbial dynamics and contamination of sheep meat.
Omer MK; Hauge SJ; Østensvik Ø; Moen B; Alvseike O; Røtterud OJ; Prieto M; Dommersnes S; Nesteng OH; Nesbakken T
Int J Food Microbiol; 2015 Feb; 194():7-14. PubMed ID: 25461602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hierarchical Bayesian models to assess between- and within-batch variability of pathogen contamination in food.
Commeau N; Cornu M; Albert I; Denis JB; Parent E
Risk Anal; 2012 Mar; 32(3):395-415. PubMed ID: 22043854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sampling and sample preparation methods for determining concentrations of mycotoxins in foods and feeds.
IARC Sci Publ; 2012; (158):39-51. PubMed ID: 23477195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of slaughterhouse and day of sample on the probability of a pig carcass being Salmonella-positive according to the Enterobacteriaceae count in the largest Brazilian pork production region.
Corbellini LG; Júnior AB; de Freitas Costa E; Duarte AS; Albuquerque ER; Kich JD; Cardoso M; Nauta M
Int J Food Microbiol; 2016 Jul; 228():58-66. PubMed ID: 27107299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A systematic review of studies on Escherichia coli and Enterobacteriaceae on beef carcasses at the slaughterhouse.
Barco L; Belluco S; Roccato A; Ricci A
Int J Food Microbiol; 2015 Aug; 207():30-9. PubMed ID: 25978803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Microbiological carcass sampling methods to achieve compliance with 2001/471/EC and new hygiene regulations.
Byrne B; Dunne G; Lyng J; Bolton DJ
Res Microbiol; 2005; 156(1):104-6. PubMed ID: 15636754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Microbiological sampling plan based on risk classification to verify supplier selection and production of served meals in food service operation.
Lahou E; Jacxsens L; Van Landeghem F; Uyttendaele M
Food Microbiol; 2014 Aug; 41():60-75. PubMed ID: 24750814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Hot water surface pasteurisation of lamb carcasses: microbial effects and cost-benefit considerations.
Hauge SJ; Wahlgren M; Røtterud OJ; Nesbakken T
Int J Food Microbiol; 2011 Mar; 146(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 21356564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Proposal of performance objectives and sampling schemes for Listeria monocytogenes in fresh meat intended to be eaten cooked under different storage practices.
De Cesare A; Valero A; Rodríguez-Lázaro D; Hernández M; Pasquali F; Manfreda G
Int J Food Microbiol; 2014 Aug; 184():50-4. PubMed ID: 24560104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fitting a distribution to microbial counts: making sense of zeroes.
Duarte AS; Stockmarr A; Nauta MJ
Int J Food Microbiol; 2015 Mar; 196():40-50. PubMed ID: 25522056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Excision vs sponge swabbing - a comparison of methods for the microbiological sampling of beef, pork and lamb carcasses.
Pearce RA; Bolton DJ
J Appl Microbiol; 2005; 98(4):896-900. PubMed ID: 15752336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment of Pharmaceutical Products.
Eissa ME
PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2017; 71(3):245-251. PubMed ID: 27974628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Relationships between the density of different indicator organisms on sheep and beef carcasses and in frozen beef and sheep meat.
Jordan D; Phillips D; Sumner J; Morris S; Jenson I
J Appl Microbiol; 2007 Jan; 102(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 17184320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Count data distributions and their zero-modified equivalents as a framework for modelling microbial data with a relatively high occurrence of zero counts.
Gonzales-Barron U; Kerr M; Sheridan JJ; Butler F
Int J Food Microbiol; 2010 Jan; 136(3):268-77. PubMed ID: 19913934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
