141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23279817)
21. Microbiological criteria for Campylobacter in broiler carcasses in Italy: a possible approach to derive them.
Comin D; Valero A; Manfreda G; García-Gimeno RM; Paiusco A; De Medici D; Terza P; Ferrarini S; De Cesare A
Int J Food Microbiol; 2014 Aug; 184():64-8. PubMed ID: 24726437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Analysis of industry-generated data. Part 2: Risk-based sampling plan for efficient self-control of aflatoxin M₁ contamination in raw milk.
Farkas Z; Trevisani M; Horváth Z; Serraino A; Szabó IJ; Kerekes K; Szeitzné-Szabó M; Ambrus A
Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess; 2014; 31(7):1257-73. PubMed ID: 24844131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Risk based microbiological criteria for Campylobacter in broiler meat in the European Union.
Nauta MJ; Sanaa M; Havelaar AH
Int J Food Microbiol; 2012 Sep; 158(3):209-17. PubMed ID: 22877637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The contribution of sampling uncertainty to total measurement uncertainty in the enumeration of microorganisms in foods.
Jarvis B; Hedges AJ; Corry JE
Food Microbiol; 2012 Jun; 30(2):362-71. PubMed ID: 22365349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Sampling plans in microbiological criteria for food and their "performance criteria"].
Dahms S; Hildebrandt G; Weiss H; Arndt G
Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2001; 114(11-12):465-9. PubMed ID: 11766275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Statistical aspects of food safety sampling.
Jongenburger I; den Besten HM; Zwietering MH
Annu Rev Food Sci Technol; 2015; 6():479-503. PubMed ID: 25747233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Quantitative risk assessment: is more complex always better? Simple is not stupid and complex is not always more correct.
Zwietering MH
Int J Food Microbiol; 2009 Aug; 134(1-2):57-62. PubMed ID: 19171404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Modelling homogeneous and heterogeneous microbial contaminations in a powdered food product.
Jongenburger I; Reij MW; Boer EP; Zwietering MH; Gorris LG
Int J Food Microbiol; 2012 Jun; 157(1):35-44. PubMed ID: 22591548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Some remarks on the design of three-class sampling plans.
Dahms S; Hildebrandt G
J Food Prot; 1998 Jun; 61(6):757-61. PubMed ID: 9709263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Microbial contamination on beef in relation to hygiene assessment based on criteria used in EU Decision 2001/471/EC.
McEvoy JM; Sheridan JJ; Blair IS; McDowell DA
Int J Food Microbiol; 2004 Apr; 92(2):217-25. PubMed ID: 15109799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Trends in the microbial contamination of bovine, ovine and swine carcasses in three small-scale abattoirs in central Italy: A four-year monitoring.
Petruzzelli A; Osimani A; Pasquini M; Clementi F; Vetrano V; Paolini F; Foglini M; Micci E; Paoloni A; Tonucci F
Meat Sci; 2016 Jan; 111():53-9. PubMed ID: 26340741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Risk assessment and risk management for safe foods: Assessment needs inclusion of variability and uncertainty, management needs discrete decisions.
Zwietering MH
Int J Food Microbiol; 2015 Nov; 213():118-23. PubMed ID: 25890788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Microbial performance of food safety management systems implemented in the lamb production chain.
Osés SM; Luning PA; Jacxsens L; Santillana S; Jaime I; Rovira J
J Food Prot; 2012 Jan; 75(1):95-103. PubMed ID: 22221360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Sampling plans and microbiological criteria as risk management options in recently developed food safety concerns].
Dahms S
Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2004; 117(5-6):193-200. PubMed ID: 15188678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Evaluation of control over the microbiological contamination of carcasses in a lamb carcass dressing process operated with or without pasteurizing treatment.
Milios K; Mataragas M; Pantouvakis A; Drosinos EH; Zoiopoulos PE
Int J Food Microbiol; 2011 Mar; 146(2):170-5. PubMed ID: 21406314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Characterizing uncertainty when evaluating risk management metrics: risk assessment modeling of Listeria monocytogenes contamination in ready-to-eat deli meats.
Gallagher D; Ebel ED; Gallagher O; Labarre D; Williams MS; Golden NJ; Pouillot R; Dearfield KL; Kause J
Int J Food Microbiol; 2013 Apr; 162(3):266-75. PubMed ID: 23454818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The effect of the number of sample units tested on the precision of microbial colony counts.
Jarvis B; Hedges AJ
Food Microbiol; 2011 Sep; 28(6):1211-9. PubMed ID: 21645822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of Three-Class Attributes Sampling Plans and Variables Sampling Plans for Lot Acceptance Sampling in Food Microbiology.
Jarvis GA; Malcolm SA
J Food Prot; 1986 Sep; 49(9):724-728. PubMed ID: 30959683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Microbial effect of steam vacuum pasteurisation implemented after slaughtering and dressing of sheep and lamb.
Hassan AA; Skjerve E; Bergh C; Nesbakken T
Meat Sci; 2015 Jan; 99():32-7. PubMed ID: 25280360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Frequentist approach for estimation of false decision risks in conformity assessment based on measurement uncertainty of liquid chromatography analytical procedures.
Separovic L; Rebello Lourenço F
J Pharm Biomed Anal; 2020 May; 184():113203. PubMed ID: 32114160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
