These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23280217)
1. Statistical analysis plans in observational research. Trinh QD; Sun M JAMA; 2013 Jan; 309(1):32. PubMed ID: 23280217 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Statistical analysis plans in observational research--reply. Thomas L; Peterson ED JAMA; 2013 Jan; 309(1):32. PubMed ID: 23280218 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The value of statistical analysis plans in observational research: defining high-quality research from the start. Thomas L; Peterson ED JAMA; 2012 Aug; 308(8):773-4. PubMed ID: 22910753 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Improving confidence in observational studies : should statistical analysis plans be made publicly available? Onukwugha E Pharmacoeconomics; 2013 Mar; 31(3):177-9. PubMed ID: 23338964 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Study design and statistical analysis. Elston DM J Am Acad Dermatol; 2018 Aug; 79(2):207. PubMed ID: 29128448 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Twenty statistical errors even you can find in biomedical research articles. Lang T Croat Med J; 2004 Aug; 45(4):361-70. PubMed ID: 15311405 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Data presentation and the use of statistical tests in biomedical journals: can we reach a consensus? Evans RG; Su DF Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol; 2011 May; 38(5):285-6. PubMed ID: 21388434 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The Proposal to Lower P Value Thresholds to .005. Ioannidis JPA JAMA; 2018 Apr; 319(14):1429-1430. PubMed ID: 29566133 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Guidelines for reporting of statistics in European Urology. Vickers AJ; Sjoberg DD; Eur Urol; 2015 Feb; 67(2):181-7. PubMed ID: 25037638 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Bias: nothing human is strange to us]. Stegenga B Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2014 Jan; 121(1):3. PubMed ID: 24552066 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The conclusion of papers published in the Journal should be supported by an appropriate statistical analysis. Blackstone EH; Weisel RD J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Dec; 148(6):2479. PubMed ID: 25433871 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Statistical and clinical interpretation of research results. Allison GT J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2007; 97(2):165-70. PubMed ID: 17369326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of Lowering the P Value Threshold for Statistical Significance From .05 to .005 in Previously Published Randomized Clinical Trials in Major Medical Journals. Wayant C; Scott J; Vassar M JAMA; 2018 Nov; 320(17):1813-1815. PubMed ID: 30398593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Medical education research: the application of robust statistical methods. Tavakol M; Wilcox RR Int J Med Educ; 2013 May; 4():93-95. PubMed ID: 28035053 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Editorial: The Minimum Clinically Important Difference-The Least We Can Do. Leopold SS; Porcher R Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Apr; 475(4):929-932. PubMed ID: 28124297 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The essential role of balance tests in propensity-matched observational studies: comments on 'A critical appraisal of propensity-score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003' by Peter Austin, Statistics in Medicine. Hansen BB Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(12):2050-4; discussion 2066-9. PubMed ID: 18407561 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]