These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

352 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23280378)

  • 1. Reliability of objective voice measures of normal speaking voices.
    Leong K; Hawkshaw MJ; Dentchev D; Gupta R; Lurie D; Sataloff RT
    J Voice; 2013 Mar; 27(2):170-6. PubMed ID: 23280378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Acoustic comparison of vowel sounds among adult females.
    Franca MC
    J Voice; 2012 Sep; 26(5):671.e9-17. PubMed ID: 22285451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cepstral analysis of hypokinetic and ataxic voices: correlations with perceptual and other acoustic measures.
    Jannetts S; Lowit A
    J Voice; 2014 Nov; 28(6):673-80. PubMed ID: 24836365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Test-retest reliability for aerodynamic measures of voice.
    Awan SN; Novaleski CK; Yingling JR
    J Voice; 2013 Nov; 27(6):674-84. PubMed ID: 24119644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Acoustic analyses of thyroidectomy-related changes in vowel phonation.
    Solomon NP; Awan SN; Helou LB; Stojadinovic A
    J Voice; 2012 Nov; 26(6):711-20. PubMed ID: 23177742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Acoustic Voice Analysis of Young Turkish Speakers.
    Demirhan E; Unsal EM; Yilmaz C; Ertan E
    J Voice; 2016 May; 30(3):378.e21-5. PubMed ID: 26223964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of vocal intensity and vowel type on cepstral analysis of voice.
    Awan SN; Giovinco A; Owens J
    J Voice; 2012 Sep; 26(5):670.e15-20. PubMed ID: 22480754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cepstral peak prominence: a more reliable measure of dysphonia.
    Heman-Ackah YD; Heuer RJ; Michael DD; Ostrowski R; Horman M; Baroody MM; Hillenbrand J; Sataloff RT
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2003 Apr; 112(4):324-33. PubMed ID: 12731627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Acoustic analysis of voice in normal and high pitch phonation: a comparative study.
    Aithal VU; Bellur R; John S; Varghese C; Guddattu V
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2012; 64(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 22076072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An examination of intrasubject variability on the Dysphonia Severity Index.
    Awan SN; Miesemer SA; Nicolia TA
    J Voice; 2012 Nov; 26(6):814.e21-5. PubMed ID: 22921294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Aerodynamic and acoustic features of vocal effort.
    Rosenthal AL; Lowell SY; Colton RH
    J Voice; 2014 Mar; 28(2):144-53. PubMed ID: 24412040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Voice change in end-stage renal disease patients after hemodialysis: correlation of subjective hoarseness and objective acoustic parameters.
    Jung SY; Ryu JH; Park HS; Chung SM; Ryu DR; Kim HS
    J Voice; 2014 Mar; 28(2):226-30. PubMed ID: 24275458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Use of cepstral analysis for differentiating dysphonic from normal voices in children.
    Esen Aydinli F; Özcebe E; İncebay Ö
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Jan; 116():107-113. PubMed ID: 30554679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Differences and Reliability of Linear and Nonlinear Acoustic Measures as a Function of Vocal Intensity in Individuals With Voice Disorders.
    de Oliveira Florencio V; Almeida AA; Balata P; Nascimento S; Brockmann-Bauser M; Lopes LW
    J Voice; 2023 Sep; 37(5):663-681. PubMed ID: 34116889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Suitability of acoustic perturbation measures in analysing periodic and nearly periodic voice signals.
    Ma EP; Yiu EM
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2005; 57(1):38-47. PubMed ID: 15655340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Consistency of voice frequency and perturbation measures in children.
    Hill CA; Ojha S; Maturo S; Maurer R; Bunting G; Hartnick CJ
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2013 Apr; 148(4):637-41. PubMed ID: 23396592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Predictive value and discriminant capacity of cepstral- and spectral-based measures during continuous speech.
    Lowell SY; Colton RH; Kelley RT; Mizia SA
    J Voice; 2013 Jul; 27(4):393-400. PubMed ID: 23684735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Toward improved ecological validity in the acoustic measurement of overall voice quality: combining continuous speech and sustained vowels.
    Maryn Y; Corthals P; Van Cauwenberge P; Roy N; De Bodt M
    J Voice; 2010 Sep; 24(5):540-55. PubMed ID: 19883993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Objective voice analysis of Iranian speakers with normal voices.
    Dehqan A; Ansari H; Bakhtiar M
    J Voice; 2010 Mar; 24(2):161-7. PubMed ID: 19230602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of cepstral analyses for differentiating normal from dysphonic voices: a comparative study of connected speech versus sustained vowel in European Portuguese female speakers.
    Brinca LF; Batista AP; Tavares AI; Gonçalves IC; Moreno ML
    J Voice; 2014 May; 28(3):282-6. PubMed ID: 24491499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.