These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23280589)

  • 1. Estimating hazardous concentrations by an informative Bayesian approach.
    Ciffroy P; Keller M; Pasanisi A
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2013 Mar; 32(3):602-11. PubMed ID: 23280589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution].
    Biggeri A; Bellini P; Terracini B;
    Epidemiol Prev; 2001; 25(2 Suppl):1-71. PubMed ID: 11515188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Augmenting aquatic species sensitivity distributions with interspecies toxicity estimation models.
    Awkerman JA; Raimondo S; Jackson CR; Barron MG
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2014 Mar; 33(3):688-95. PubMed ID: 24214839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Acute-to-chronic species sensitivity distribution extrapolation.
    Duboudin C; Ciffroy P; Magaud H
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2004 Jul; 23(7):1774-85. PubMed ID: 15230330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Part 1. Statistical Learning Methods for the Effects of Multiple Air Pollution Constituents.
    Coull BA; Bobb JF; Wellenius GA; Kioumourtzoglou MA; Mittleman MA; Koutrakis P; Godleski JJ
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2015 Jun; (183 Pt 1-2):5-50. PubMed ID: 26333238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bayesian decision-theoretic group sequential clinical trial design based on a quadratic loss function: a frequentist evaluation.
    Lewis RJ; Lipsky AM; Berry DA
    Clin Trials; 2007; 4(1):5-14. PubMed ID: 17327241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Risk assessment using the species sensitivity distribution method: data quality versus data quantity.
    Dowse R; Tang D; Palmer CG; Kefford BJ
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2013 Jun; 32(6):1360-9. PubMed ID: 23440771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Advancing Fifth Percentile Hazard Concentration Estimation Using Toxicity-Normalized Species Sensitivity Distributions.
    Dhond AK; Barron MG
    Environ Sci Technol; 2022 Dec; 56(23):17188-17196. PubMed ID: 36410104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Investigating different approaches to develop informative priors in hierarchical Bayesian safety performance functions.
    Yu R; Abdel-Aty M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Jul; 56():51-8. PubMed ID: 23612558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Bayesian hierarchical model for mortality data from cluster-sampling household surveys in humanitarian crises.
    Heudtlass P; Guha-Sapir D; Speybroeck N
    Int J Epidemiol; 2018 Aug; 47(4):1255-1263. PubMed ID: 29860332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prediction models for clustered data with informative priors for the random effects: a simulation study.
    Ni H; Groenwold RHH; Nielen M; Klugkist I
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Aug; 18(1):83. PubMed ID: 30081875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bayesian Estimation with Informative Priors is Indistinguishable from Data Falsification.
    García-Pérez MÁ
    Span J Psychol; 2019 Oct; 22():E45. PubMed ID: 31640834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Aquatic risk assessment of a novel strobilurin fungicide: A microcosm study compared with the species sensitivity distribution approach.
    Chen L; Song Y; Tang B; Song X; Yang H; Li B; Zhao Y; Huang C; Han X; Wang S; Li Z
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2015 Oct; 120():418-27. PubMed ID: 26122735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Part 2. Development of Enhanced Statistical Methods for Assessing Health Effects Associated with an Unknown Number of Major Sources of Multiple Air Pollutants.
    Park ES; Symanski E; Han D; Spiegelman C
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2015 Jun; (183 Pt 1-2):51-113. PubMed ID: 26333239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Bayesian approach for determining the no effect concentration and hazardous concentration in ecotoxicology.
    Fox DR
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2010 Feb; 73(2):123-31. PubMed ID: 19836077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Illustrating a Species Sensitivity Distribution for Nano- and Microplastic Particles Using Bayesian Hierarchical Modeling.
    Takeshita KM; Iwasaki Y; Sinclair TM; Hayashi TI; Naito W
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2022 Apr; 41(4):954-960. PubMed ID: 35226391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bayesian methods including nonrandomized study data increased the efficiency of postlaunch RCTs.
    Schmidt AF; Klugkist I; Klungel OH; Nielen M; de Boer A; Hoes AW; Groenwold RH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Apr; 68(4):387-96. PubMed ID: 25554520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Setting water quality criteria in China: approaches for developing species sensitivity distributions for metals and metalloids.
    Liu Y; Wu F; Mu Y; Feng C; Fang Y; Chen L; Giesy JP
    Rev Environ Contam Toxicol; 2014; 230():35-57. PubMed ID: 24609517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Making species salinity sensitivity distributions reflective of naturally occurring communities: using rapid testing and Bayesian statistics.
    Hickey GL; Kefford BJ; Dunlop JE; Craig PS
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2008 Nov; 27(11):2403-11. PubMed ID: 18522453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Revisiting assessment factors for species sensitivity distributions as a function of sample size and variation in species sensitivity.
    Kamo M; Hayashi TI; Iwasaki Y
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2022 Nov; 246():114170. PubMed ID: 36242822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.