These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

289 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23281116)

  • 1. MR elastography of healthy liver parenchyma: Normal value and reliability of the liver stiffness value measurement.
    Lee DH; Lee JM; Han JK; Choi BI
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Nov; 38(5):1215-23. PubMed ID: 23281116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. MR elastography for noninvasive assessment of hepatic fibrosis: reproducibility of the examination and reproducibility and repeatability of the liver stiffness value measurement.
    Lee Yj; Lee JM; Lee JE; Lee KB; Lee ES; Yoon JH; Yu MH; Baek JH; Shin CI; Han JK; Choi BI
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Feb; 39(2):326-31. PubMed ID: 23589232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. MR-diffusion weighted imaging of healthy liver parenchyma: repeatability and reproducibility of apparent diffusion coefficient measurement.
    Colagrande S; Pasquinelli F; Mazzoni LN; Belli G; Virgili G
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Apr; 31(4):912-20. PubMed ID: 20373436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Magnetic resonance elastography of healthy livers at 3.0 T: Normal liver stiffness measured by SE-EPI and GRE.
    Bae JS; Lee JM; Park SJ; Lee KB; Han JK
    Eur J Radiol; 2018 Oct; 107():46-53. PubMed ID: 30292272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Liver Stiffness Measurements with MR Elastography: Agreement and Repeatability across Imaging Systems, Field Strengths, and Pulse Sequences.
    Trout AT; Serai S; Mahley AD; Wang H; Zhang Y; Zhang B; Dillman JR
    Radiology; 2016 Dec; 281(3):793-804. PubMed ID: 27285061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Short- and midterm repeatability of magnetic resonance elastography in healthy volunteers at 3.0 T.
    Shi Y; Guo Q; Xia F; Sun J; Gao Y
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Jul; 32(6):665-70. PubMed ID: 24650683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spin-echo Echo-planar Imaging MR Elastography versus Gradient-echo MR Elastography for Assessment of Liver Stiffness in Children and Young Adults Suspected of Having Liver Disease.
    Serai SD; Dillman JR; Trout AT
    Radiology; 2017 Mar; 282(3):761-770. PubMed ID: 27715486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Normal breast tissue stiffness measured by a new ultrasound technique: virtual touch tissue imaging quantification (VTIQ).
    Golatta M; Schweitzer-Martin M; Harcos A; Schott S; Junkermann H; Rauch G; Sohn C; Heil J
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Nov; 82(11):e676-9. PubMed ID: 23932637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Magnetic resonance elastography: evaluation of new inversion algorithm and quantitative analysis method.
    Silva AM; Grimm RC; Glaser KJ; Fu Y; Wu T; Ehman RL; Silva AC
    Abdom Imaging; 2015 Apr; 40(4):810-7. PubMed ID: 25742725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Magnetic resonance elastography of the supraspinatus muscle: A preliminary study on test-retest repeatability and wave quality with different frequencies and image filtering.
    Ito D; Numano T; Ueki T; Habe T; Maeno T; Takamoto K; Igarashi K; Maharjan S; Mizuhara K; Nishijo H
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Sep; 71():27-36. PubMed ID: 32325234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Normal liver stiffness in healthy adults assessed by real-time shear wave elastography and factors that influence this method.
    Huang Z; Zheng J; Zeng J; Wang X; Wu T; Zheng R
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Nov; 40(11):2549-55. PubMed ID: 25282481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of liver fibrosis with elastography point quantification technique in chronic hepatitis B virus patients: a comparison with liver pathological results.
    Ma JJ; Ding H; Mao F; Sun HC; Xu C; Wang WP
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2014 Apr; 29(4):814-9. PubMed ID: 24325607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Shear wave elastography for liver stiffness measurement in clinical sonographic examinations: evaluation of intraobserver reproducibility, technical failure, and unreliable stiffness measurements.
    Yoon JH; Lee JM; Han JK; Choi BI
    J Ultrasound Med; 2014 Mar; 33(3):437-47. PubMed ID: 24567455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of Standard Breath-Held, Free-Breathing, and Compressed Sensing 2D Gradient-Recalled Echo MR Elastography Techniques for Evaluating Liver Stiffness.
    Morin CE; Dillman JR; Serai SD; Trout AT; Tkach JA; Wang H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Dec; 211(6):W279-W287. PubMed ID: 30300003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Relationship of MR elastography determined liver stiffness with cardiac function after Fontan palliation.
    Wallihan DB; Podberesky DJ; Marino BS; Sticka JS; Serai S
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Dec; 40(6):1328-35. PubMed ID: 24408379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Magnetic resonance elastography SE-EPI vs GRE sequences at 3T in a pediatric population with liver disease.
    Calle-Toro JS; Serai SD; Hartung EA; Goldberg DJ; Bolster BD; Darge K; Anupindi SA
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Mar; 44(3):894-902. PubMed ID: 30600386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Do regions of interest location and type influence liver stiffness measurement using magnetic resonance elastography?
    Cogneau A; Cho H; Lucidarme O; Wagner M
    Diagn Interv Imaging; 2019 Jun; 100(6):363-370. PubMed ID: 30745249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. MR elastography of liver at 3 Tesla: comparison of gradient-recalled echo (GRE) and spin-echo (SE) echo-planar imaging (EPI) sequences and agreement across stiffness measurements.
    Zhan C; Kannengiesser S; Chandarana H; Fenchel M; Ream J; Shanbhogue KP
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 May; 44(5):1825-1833. PubMed ID: 30796479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Short-Term Repeatability of Magnetic Resonance Elastography at 3.0T: Effects of Motion-Encoding Gradient Direction, Slice Position, and Meal Ingestion.
    Zhang J; Arena C; Pednekar A; Lambert B; Dees D; Lee VV; Muthupillai R
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Mar; 43(3):704-12. PubMed ID: 26331461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Repeatability and reproducibility of 2D and 3D hepatic MR elastography with rigid and flexible drivers at end-expiration and end-inspiration in healthy volunteers.
    Wang K; Manning P; Szeverenyi N; Wolfson T; Hamilton G; Middleton MS; Vaida F; Yin M; Glaser K; Ehman RL; Sirlin CB
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Dec; 42(12):2843-2854. PubMed ID: 28612163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.