These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

336 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23281143)

  • 21. Nanotechnology for bone materials.
    Tran N; Webster TJ
    Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol; 2009; 1(3):336-51. PubMed ID: 20049801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Piezoelectric materials as stimulatory biomedical materials and scaffolds for bone repair.
    Tandon B; Blaker JJ; Cartmell SH
    Acta Biomater; 2018 Jun; 73():1-20. PubMed ID: 29673838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Bioinspired Collagen-Apatite Nanocomposites for Bone Regeneration.
    Liu S; Sun Y; Fu Y; Chang D; Fu C; Wang G; Liu Y; Tay FR; Zhou Y
    J Endod; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1226-32. PubMed ID: 27377439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Three-dimensional (3D) printed scaffold and material selection for bone repair.
    Zhang L; Yang G; Johnson BN; Jia X
    Acta Biomater; 2019 Jan; 84():16-33. PubMed ID: 30481607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A poly(lactide-co-glycolide)/hydroxyapatite composite scaffold with enhanced osteoconductivity.
    Kim SS; Ahn KM; Park MS; Lee JH; Choi CY; Kim BS
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2007 Jan; 80(1):206-15. PubMed ID: 17072849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Nanotechnology and orthopedics: a personal perspective.
    Laurencin CT; Kumbar SG; Nukavarapu SP
    Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol; 2009; 1(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 20049774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Scaffolds Fabricated from Natural Polymers/Composites by Electrospinning for Bone Tissue Regeneration.
    Sofi HS; Ashraf R; Beigh MA; Sheikh FA
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2018; 1078():49-78. PubMed ID: 30357618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Osteoblast-seeded bioglass/gelatin nanocomposite: a promising bone substitute in critical-size calvarial defect repair in rat.
    Johari B; Kadivar M; Lak S; Gholipourmalekabadi M; Urbanska AM; Mozafari M; Ahmadzadehzarajabad M; Azarnezhad A; Afshari S; Zargan J; Kargozar S
    Int J Artif Organs; 2016 Nov; 39(10):524-533. PubMed ID: 27901555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Micro and nanotechnologies for bone regeneration: Recent advances and emerging designs.
    Mohammadi M; Mousavi Shaegh SA; Alibolandi M; Ebrahimzadeh MH; Tamayol A; Jaafari MR; Ramezani M
    J Control Release; 2018 Mar; 274():35-55. PubMed ID: 29410062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Tissue engineering scaffolds for the regeneration of craniofacial bone.
    Chan WD; Perinpanayagam H; Goldberg HA; Hunter GK; Dixon SJ; Santos GC; Rizkalla AS
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2009 Jun; 75(5):373-7. PubMed ID: 19531334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A new method of fabricating robust freeform 3D ceramic scaffolds for bone tissue regeneration.
    Seol YJ; Park DY; Park JY; Kim SW; Park SJ; Cho DW
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2013 May; 110(5):1444-55. PubMed ID: 23192318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Hierarchically biomimetic bone scaffold materials: nano-HA/collagen/PLA composite.
    Liao SS; Cui FZ; Zhang W; Feng QL
    J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2004 May; 69(2):158-65. PubMed ID: 15116405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Electrospun nanostructured scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.
    Prabhakaran MP; Venugopal J; Ramakrishna S
    Acta Biomater; 2009 Oct; 5(8):2884-93. PubMed ID: 19447211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Design strategies and applications of nacre-based biomaterials.
    Gerhard EM; Wang W; Li C; Guo J; Ozbolat IT; Rahn KM; Armstrong AD; Xia J; Qian G; Yang J
    Acta Biomater; 2017 May; 54():21-34. PubMed ID: 28274766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Hierarchically designed bone scaffolds: From internal cues to external stimuli.
    Du Y; Guo JL; Wang J; Mikos AG; Zhang S
    Biomaterials; 2019 Oct; 218():119334. PubMed ID: 31306826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Nanomaterials/Nanocomposites for Osteochondral Tissue.
    Manoukian OS; Dieck C; Milne T; Dealy CN; Rudraiah S; Kumbar SG
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2018; 1058():79-95. PubMed ID: 29691818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis.
    Karageorgiou V; Kaplan D
    Biomaterials; 2005 Sep; 26(27):5474-91. PubMed ID: 15860204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Silk scaffolds in bone tissue engineering: An overview.
    Bhattacharjee P; Kundu B; Naskar D; Kim HW; Maiti TK; Bhattacharya D; Kundu SC
    Acta Biomater; 2017 Nov; 63():1-17. PubMed ID: 28941652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Graphene-Based Nanocomposites as Promising Options for Hard Tissue Regeneration.
    Shin YC; Song SJ; Jeong SJ; Kim B; Kwon IK; Hong SW; Oh JW; Han DW
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2018; 1078():103-117. PubMed ID: 30357620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Nanotechnology-based bone regeneration in orthopedics: a review of recent trends.
    Liang W; Zhou C; Bai J; Zhang H; Long H; Jiang B; Liu L; Xia L; Jiang C; Zhang H; Zhao J
    Nanomedicine (Lond); 2024 Feb; 19(3):255-275. PubMed ID: 38275154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.