These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23281614)

  • 41. TriLoNet: Piecing Together Small Networks to Reconstruct Reticulate Evolutionary Histories.
    Oldman J; Wu T; van Iersel L; Moulton V
    Mol Biol Evol; 2016 Aug; 33(8):2151-62. PubMed ID: 27189565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Fast likelihood calculation for multivariate Gaussian phylogenetic models with shifts.
    Mitov V; Bartoszek K; Asimomitis G; Stadler T
    Theor Popul Biol; 2020 Feb; 131():66-78. PubMed ID: 31805292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Spaces of phylogenetic networks from generalized nearest-neighbor interchange operations.
    Huber KT; Linz S; Moulton V; Wu T
    J Math Biol; 2016 Feb; 72(3):699-725. PubMed ID: 26037483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Applicability of several rooted phylogenetic network algorithms for representing the evolutionary history of SARS-CoV-2.
    Wallin R; van Iersel L; Kelk S; Stougie L
    BMC Ecol Evol; 2021 Dec; 21(1):220. PubMed ID: 34876022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Distinguishing terminal monophyletic groups from reticulate taxa: performance of phenetic, tree-based, and network procedures.
    Reeves PA; Richards CM
    Syst Biol; 2007 Apr; 56(2):302-20. PubMed ID: 17464885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Model selection and model averaging in phylogenetics: advantages of akaike information criterion and bayesian approaches over likelihood ratio tests.
    Posada D; Buckley TR
    Syst Biol; 2004 Oct; 53(5):793-808. PubMed ID: 15545256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies.
    Huson DH; Bryant D
    Mol Biol Evol; 2006 Feb; 23(2):254-67. PubMed ID: 16221896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Inferring demographic parameters in bacterial genomic data using Bayesian and hybrid phylogenetic methods.
    Duchene S; Duchene DA; Geoghegan JL; Dyson ZA; Hawkey J; Holt KE
    BMC Evol Biol; 2018 Jun; 18(1):95. PubMed ID: 29914372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Phylogenetic systematics and biogeography of hummingbirds: Bayesian and maximum likelihood analyses of partitioned data and selection of an appropriate partitioning strategy.
    McGuire JA; Witt CC; Altshuler DL; Remsen JV
    Syst Biol; 2007 Oct; 56(5):837-56. PubMed ID: 17934998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Visualizing conflicting evolutionary hypotheses in large collections of trees: using consensus networks to study the origins of placentals and hexapods.
    Holland B; Delsuc F; Moulton V
    Syst Biol; 2005 Feb; 54(1):66-76. PubMed ID: 15805011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Simultaneous Bayesian inference of phylogeny and molecular coevolution.
    Meyer X; Dib L; Silvestro D; Salamin N
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2019 Mar; 116(11):5027-5036. PubMed ID: 30808804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Reconstructing Tree-Child Networks from Reticulate-Edge-Deleted Subnetworks.
    Murakami Y; van Iersel L; Janssen R; Jones M; Moulton V
    Bull Math Biol; 2019 Oct; 81(10):3823-3863. PubMed ID: 31297691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Information Criteria for Comparing Partition Schemes.
    Seo TK; Thorne JL
    Syst Biol; 2018 Jul; 67(4):616-632. PubMed ID: 29309694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Comparison of likelihood and Bayesian methods for estimating divergence times using multiple gene Loci and calibration points, with application to a radiation of cute-looking mouse lemur species.
    Yang Z; Yoder AD
    Syst Biol; 2003 Oct; 52(5):705-16. PubMed ID: 14530137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Assessment of substitution model adequacy using frequentist and Bayesian methods.
    Ripplinger J; Sullivan J
    Mol Biol Evol; 2010 Dec; 27(12):2790-803. PubMed ID: 20616145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Unifying vertical and nonvertical evolution: a stochastic ARG-based framework.
    Bloomquist EW; Suchard MA
    Syst Biol; 2010 Jan; 59(1):27-41. PubMed ID: 20525618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Inferring phylogenetic networks by the maximum parsimony criterion: a case study.
    Jin G; Nakhleh L; Snir S; Tuller T
    Mol Biol Evol; 2007 Jan; 24(1):324-37. PubMed ID: 17068107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Supermatrix and species tree methods resolve phylogenetic relationships within the big cats, Panthera (Carnivora: Felidae).
    Davis BW; Li G; Murphy WJ
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2010 Jul; 56(1):64-76. PubMed ID: 20138224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Model selection and psychological theory: a discussion of the differences between the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and the Bayesian information criterion (BIC).
    Vrieze SI
    Psychol Methods; 2012 Jun; 17(2):228-43. PubMed ID: 22309957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Full reconstruction of non-stationary strand-symmetric models on rooted phylogenies.
    Kaehler BD
    J Theor Biol; 2017 May; 420():144-151. PubMed ID: 28286217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.