These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23281832)

  • 1. The N1-suppression effect for self-initiated sounds is independent of attention.
    Timm J; SanMiguel I; Saupe K; Schröger E
    BMC Neurosci; 2013 Jan; 14():2. PubMed ID: 23281832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sensory suppression effects to self-initiated sounds reflect the attenuation of the unspecific N1 component of the auditory ERP.
    SanMiguel I; Todd J; Schröger E
    Psychophysiology; 2013 Apr; 50(4):334-43. PubMed ID: 23351131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cerebellar contribution to the prediction of self-initiated sounds.
    Knolle F; Schröger E; Kotz SA
    Cortex; 2013 Oct; 49(9):2449-61. PubMed ID: 23318086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sensory suppression of brain responses to self-generated sounds is observed with and without the perception of agency.
    Timm J; Schönwiesner M; Schröger E; SanMiguel I
    Cortex; 2016 Jul; 80():5-20. PubMed ID: 27137101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Selective suppression of self-initiated sounds in an auditory stream: An ERP study.
    Baess P; Horváth J; Jacobsen T; Schröger E
    Psychophysiology; 2011 Sep; 48(9):1276-83. PubMed ID: 21449953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sensorial suppression of self-generated sounds and its dependence on attention.
    Saupe K; Widmann A; Trujillo-Barreto NJ; Schröger E
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Dec; 90(3):300-10. PubMed ID: 24095710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Suppression and omission effects in auditory predictive processing-Two of the same?
    Tast V; Schröger E; Widmann A
    Eur J Neurosci; 2024 Jul; 60(2):4049-4062. PubMed ID: 38764129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Self-initiated actions result in suppressed auditory but amplified visual evoked components in healthy participants.
    Mifsud NG; Oestreich LK; Jack BN; Ford JM; Roach BJ; Mathalon DH; Whitford TJ
    Psychophysiology; 2016 May; 53(5):723-32. PubMed ID: 26751981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Electrophysiological alterations in motor-auditory predictive coding in autism spectrum disorder.
    van Laarhoven T; Stekelenburg JJ; Eussen MLJM; Vroomen J
    Autism Res; 2019 Apr; 12(4):589-599. PubMed ID: 30801964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Suppression of the auditory N1-component for heartbeat-related sounds reflects interoceptive predictive coding.
    van Elk M; Lenggenhager B; Heydrich L; Blanke O
    Biol Psychol; 2014 May; 99():172-82. PubMed ID: 24680787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Suppression of the N1 auditory evoked potential for sounds generated by the upper and lower limbs.
    van Elk M; Salomon R; Kannape O; Blanke O
    Biol Psychol; 2014 Oct; 102():108-17. PubMed ID: 25019590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Attenuation of auditory evoked potentials for hand and eye-initiated sounds.
    Mifsud NG; Beesley T; Watson TL; Whitford TJ
    Biol Psychol; 2016 Oct; 120():61-68. PubMed ID: 27592269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Self-initiation and temporal cueing of monaural tones reduce the auditory N1 and P2.
    Sowman PF; Kuusik A; Johnson BW
    Exp Brain Res; 2012 Oct; 222(1-2):149-57. PubMed ID: 22885999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Motor intention determines sensory attenuation of brain responses to self-initiated sounds.
    Timm J; SanMiguel I; Keil J; Schröger E; Schönwiesner M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2014 Jul; 26(7):1481-9. PubMed ID: 24392902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Suppression of the auditory N1 event-related potential component with unpredictable self-initiated tones: evidence for internal forward models with dynamic stimulation.
    Bäss P; Jacobsen T; Schröger E
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2008 Nov; 70(2):137-43. PubMed ID: 18627782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Which kind of transition is important for sound representation? An event-related potential study.
    Weise A; Bendixen A; Müller D; Schröger E
    Brain Res; 2012 Jun; 1464():30-42. PubMed ID: 22613810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Implicit agency in observed actions: evidence for N1 suppression of tones caused by self-made and observed actions.
    Poonian SK; McFadyen J; Ogden J; Cunnington R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2015 Apr; 27(4):752-64. PubMed ID: 25321488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Violation of identity-specific action-effect prediction increases pupil size and attenuates auditory event-related potentials at P2 latencies when action-effects are behaviorally relevant.
    Lindner E; Desantis A; Cheng FP; Gail A
    Neuroimage; 2024 Aug; 297():120717. PubMed ID: 38971482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Action-sound coincidences suppress evoked responses of the human auditory cortex in EEG and MEG.
    Horváth J; Maess B; Baess P; Tóth A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2012 Sep; 24(9):1919-31. PubMed ID: 22360594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Attenuated human auditory middle latency response and evoked 40-Hz response to self-initiated sounds.
    Baess P; Widmann A; Roye A; Schröger E; Jacobsen T
    Eur J Neurosci; 2009 Apr; 29(7):1514-21. PubMed ID: 19323693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.