1114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23281901)
1. Characteristics, interventions, and outcomes of women who used a birthing pool: a prospective observational study.
Burns EE; Boulton MG; Cluett E; Cornelius VR; Smith LA
Birth; 2012 Sep; 39(3):192-202. PubMed ID: 23281901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of intrapartum interventions and adverse outcomes by parity in planned freestanding midwifery unit and alongside midwifery unit births: secondary analysis of 'low risk' births in the birthplace in England cohort.
Hollowell J; Li Y; Bunch K; Brocklehurst P
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Mar; 17(1):95. PubMed ID: 28320352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The influence of preferred place of birth on the course of pregnancy and labor among healthy nulliparous women: a prospective cohort study.
van Haaren-ten Haken TM; Hendrix M; Smits LJ; Nieuwenhuijze MJ; Severens JL; de Vries RG; Nijhuis JG
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2015 Feb; 15():33. PubMed ID: 25884308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Labouring women who used a birthing pool in obstetric units in Italy: prospective observational study.
Henderson J; Burns EE; Regalia AL; Casarico G; Boulton MG; Smith LA
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2014 Jan; 14():17. PubMed ID: 24423216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Are freestanding midwifery units a safe alternative to obstetric units for low-risk, primiparous childbirth? An analysis of effect differences by parity in a matched cohort study.
Christensen LF; Overgaard C
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Jan; 17(1):14. PubMed ID: 28068929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Perinatal and maternal outcomes by planned place of birth for healthy women with low risk pregnancies: the Birthplace in England national prospective cohort study.
; Brocklehurst P; Hardy P; Hollowell J; Linsell L; Macfarlane A; McCourt C; Marlow N; Miller A; Newburn M; Petrou S; Puddicombe D; Redshaw M; Rowe R; Sandall J; Silverton L; Stewart M
BMJ; 2011 Nov; 343():d7400. PubMed ID: 22117057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The "Cocoon," first alongside midwifery-led unit within a Belgian hospital: Comparison of the maternal and neonatal outcomes with the standard obstetric unit over 2 years.
Welffens K; Derisbourg S; Costa E; Englert Y; Pintiaux A; Warnimont M; Kirkpatrick C; Buekens P; Daelemans C
Birth; 2020 Mar; 47(1):115-122. PubMed ID: 31746028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluating Maternity Units: a prospective cohort study of freestanding midwife-led primary maternity units in New Zealand-clinical outcomes.
Grigg CP; Tracy SK; Tracy M; Daellenbach R; Kensington M; Monk A; Schmied V
BMJ Open; 2017 Aug; 7(8):e016288. PubMed ID: 28851782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Maternal and neonatal outcome of births planned in alongside midwifery units: a cohort study from a tertiary center in Germany.
Merz WM; Tascon-Padron L; Puth MT; Heep A; Tietjen SL; Schmid M; Gembruch U
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 May; 20(1):267. PubMed ID: 32375692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Systematic review and meta-analysis to examine intrapartum interventions, and maternal and neonatal outcomes following immersion in water during labour and waterbirth.
Burns E; Feeley C; Hall PJ; Vanderlaan J
BMJ Open; 2022 Jul; 12(7):e056517. PubMed ID: 35790327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Outcomes of independent midwifery attended births in birth centres and home births: a retrospective cohort study in Japan.
Kataoka Y; Eto H; Iida M
Midwifery; 2013 Aug; 29(8):965-72. PubMed ID: 23415360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Differences in optimality index between planned place of birth in a birth centre and alternative planned places of birth, a nationwide prospective cohort study in The Netherlands: results of the Dutch Birth Centre Study.
Hermus MAA; Hitzert M; Boesveld IC; van den Akker-van Marle ME; Dommelen PV; Franx A; Graaf JP; Lith JMMV; Luurssen-Masurel N; Steegers EAP; Wiegers TA; Bruin KMVP
BMJ Open; 2017 Nov; 7(11):e016958. PubMed ID: 29150465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Outcomes of care for 16,924 planned home births in the United States: the Midwives Alliance of North America Statistics Project, 2004 to 2009.
Cheyney M; Bovbjerg M; Everson C; Gordon W; Hannibal D; Vedam S
J Midwifery Womens Health; 2014; 59(1):17-27. PubMed ID: 24479690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Perinatal and maternal outcomes in planned home and obstetric unit births in women at 'higher risk' of complications: secondary analysis of the Birthplace national prospective cohort study.
Li Y; Townend J; Rowe R; Brocklehurst P; Knight M; Linsell L; Macfarlane A; McCourt C; Newburn M; Marlow N; Pasupathy D; Redshaw M; Sandall J; Silverton L; Hollowell J
BJOG; 2015 Apr; 122(5):741-53. PubMed ID: 25603762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In the literature: home birth: safe enough, but not for the first baby.
Buekens P; Keirse MJ
Birth; 2012 Jun; 39(2):165-7. PubMed ID: 23281865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Birth Outcomes for Planned Home and Licensed Freestanding Birth Center Births in Washington State.
Nethery E; Schummers L; Levine A; Caughey AB; Souter V; Gordon W
Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 138(5):693-702. PubMed ID: 34619716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Model of care and chance of spontaneous vaginal birth: a prospective, multicenter matched-pair analysis from North Rhine-Westphalia.
Tietjen SL; Schmitz MT; Heep A; Kocks A; Gerzen L; Schmid M; Gembruch U; Merz WM
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2021 Dec; 21(1):849. PubMed ID: 34969368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Freestanding midwifery units: Maternal and neonatal outcomes following transfer.
Monk AR; Grigg CP; Foureur M; Tracy M; Tracy SK
Midwifery; 2017 Mar; 46():24-28. PubMed ID: 28126592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of partnership caseload midwifery care with conventional team midwifery care: labour and birth outcomes.
Benjamin Y; Walsh D; Taub N
Midwifery; 2001 Sep; 17(3):234-40. PubMed ID: 11502143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Exploration of preterm birth rates associated with different models of antenatal midwifery care in Scotland: Unmatched retrospective cohort analysis.
Symon A; Winter C; Cochrane L
Midwifery; 2015 Jun; 31(6):590-6. PubMed ID: 25819706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
