144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23281902)
1. Rates of interventions in labor and birth across Canada: findings of the Canadian Maternity Experiences Survey.
Chalmers B; Kaczorowski J; O'Brien B; Royle C
Birth; 2012 Sep; 39(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 23281902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of routine interventions in vaginal labor and birth: findings from the Maternity Experiences Survey.
Chalmers B; Kaczorowski J; Levitt C; Dzakpasu S; O'Brien B; Lee L; Boscoe M; Young D; ;
Birth; 2009 Mar; 36(1):13-25. PubMed ID: 19278379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Canadian maternity experiences survey: an overview of findings.
Chalmers B; Dzakpasu S; Heaman M; Kaczorowski J
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2008 Mar; 30(3):217-228. PubMed ID: 18364099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Canadian maternity experiences survey pilot study.
Dzakpasu S; Chalmers B;
Birth; 2005 Mar; 32(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 15725203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Breastfeeding rates and hospital breastfeeding practices in Canada: a national survey of women.
Chalmers B; Levitt C; Heaman M; O'Brien B; Sauve R; Kaczorowski J;
Birth; 2009 Jun; 36(2):122-32. PubMed ID: 19489806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The experience of pregnancy and birth with midwives: results from the Canadian maternity experiences survey.
O'Brien B; Chalmers B; Fell D; Heaman M; Darling EK; Herbert P
Birth; 2011 Sep; 38(3):207-15. PubMed ID: 21884229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Obstetric interventions for low-risk pregnant women in France: do maternity unit characteristics make a difference?
Coulm B; Le Ray C; Lelong N; Drewniak N; Zeitlin J; Blondel B
Birth; 2012 Sep; 39(3):183-91. PubMed ID: 23281900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Canadian maternity experiences survey: design and methods.
Dzakpasu S; Kaczorowski J; Chalmers B; Heaman M; Duggan J; Neusy E
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2008 Mar; 30(3):207-216. PubMed ID: 18364098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cesarean and vaginal birth in canadian women: a comparison of experiences.
Chalmers B; Kaczorowski J; Darling E; Heaman M; Fell DB; O'Brien B; Lee L;
Birth; 2010 Mar; 37(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 20402721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Use of routine interventions in labour and birth in Canadian hospitals: comparing results of the 1993 and 2007 Canadian hospital maternity policies and practices surveys.
Levitt C; Hanvey L; Bartholomew S; Kaczorowski J; Chalmers B; Heaman M; Li X;
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2011 Dec; 33(12):1208-1217. PubMed ID: 22166274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Widespread non-adherence to evidence-based maternity care guidelines: a population-based cluster randomised household survey.
Nagpal J; Sachdeva A; Sengupta Dhar R; Bhargava VL; Bhartia A
BJOG; 2015 Jan; 122(2):238-47. PubMed ID: 25145674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Practices of skilled birth attendants during labour, birth and the immediate postpartum period in Cambodia.
Ith P; Dawson A; Homer CS; Klinken Whelan A
Midwifery; 2013 Apr; 29(4):300-7. PubMed ID: 22342172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Trends in the medicalisation of childbirth in Flanders and the Netherlands.
Christiaens W; Nieuwenhuijze MJ; de Vries R
Midwifery; 2013 Jan; 29(1):e1-8. PubMed ID: 23266221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Breech presentation at term: a survey on obstetrical practice in France and a search for a homogeneous attitude associated with lower neonatal risk].
Vendittelli F; Roche S; Pons JC; Mamelle N;
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2002 Oct; 31(6):577-88. PubMed ID: 12407330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Do perinatal guidelines have an impact on obstetric practices?
Vendittelli F; Rivière O; Crenn-Hébert C; Giraud-Roufast A;
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2012 Oct; 60(5):355-62. PubMed ID: 22981161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Care in labor: a Swedish survey using the Bologna Score.
Sandin-Bojö AK; Kvist LJ
Birth; 2008 Dec; 35(4):321-8. PubMed ID: 19036045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Preconception and interconception health status of women who recently gave birth to a live-born infant--Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS), United States, 26 reporting areas, 2004.
D'Angelo D; Williams L; Morrow B; Cox S; Harris N; Harrison L; Posner SF; Hood JR; Zapata L;
MMWR Surveill Summ; 2007 Dec; 56(10):1-35. PubMed ID: 18075488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Management of the woman with threatened birth of an infant of extremely low gestational age. Fetus and Newborn Committee, Canadian Paediatric Society, Maternal-Fetal Medicine Committee, Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada.
CMAJ; 1994 Sep; 151(5):547-53. PubMed ID: 7520829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Giving birth in two maternity hospitals in Lithuania.
Chalmers B; Jeckaite D
Birth; 2010 Jun; 37(2):116-23. PubMed ID: 20557534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Women's experience of discrimination in Australian perinatal care: the double disadvantage of social adversity and unequal care.
Yelland JS; Sutherland GA; Brown SJ
Birth; 2012 Sep; 39(3):211-20. PubMed ID: 23281903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
