These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23281946)

  • 1. Obstetric variation, intervention, and outcomes: doing more but accomplishing less.
    Glantz JC
    Birth; 2012 Dec; 39(4):286-90. PubMed ID: 23281946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Carol Sakala's letter from North America: an uncontrolled experiment: elective delivery predominates in the United States.
    Birth; 2006 Dec; 33(4):332-5. PubMed ID: 17190018
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hospital-Level Variation in the Frequency of Cesarean Delivery Among Nulliparous Women Who Undergo Labor Induction.
    Main EK; Chang SC; Cheng YW; Rosenstein MG; Lagrew DC
    Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Dec; 136(6):1179-1189. PubMed ID: 33156193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. U.S. trends in obstetric procedures, 1990-2000.
    Kozak LJ; Weeks JD
    Birth; 2002 Sep; 29(3):157-61. PubMed ID: 12153645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Study probes increase in cesarean rate.
    Kuehn BM
    JAMA; 2010 Oct; 304(15):1658. PubMed ID: 20959570
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The labor-adjusted cesarean section: a more informative method than the cesarean section "rate" for assessing a practitioner's labor and delivery skills.
    Sandmire HF
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Jan; 178(1 Pt 1):196-7. PubMed ID: 9465833
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The relationship between cesarean section and labor induction.
    Wilson BL; Effken J; Butler RJ
    J Nurs Scholarsh; 2010 Jun; 42(2):130-8. PubMed ID: 20618597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cesarean section rates in Italy.
    Signorelli C; Cattaruzza MS
    Am J Public Health; 1994 Aug; 84(8):1340-1. PubMed ID: 8059904
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Variation in hospital caesarean section rates and obstetric outcomes among nulliparae at term: a population-based cohort study.
    Nippita TA; Lee YY; Patterson JA; Ford JB; Morris JM; Nicholl MC; Roberts CL
    BJOG; 2015 Apr; 122(5):702-11. PubMed ID: 25605625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Use of routine interventions in vaginal labor and birth: findings from the Maternity Experiences Survey.
    Chalmers B; Kaczorowski J; Levitt C; Dzakpasu S; O'Brien B; Lee L; Boscoe M; Young D; ;
    Birth; 2009 Mar; 36(1):13-25. PubMed ID: 19278379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Changes in maternal characteristics and obstetric practice and recent increases in primary cesarean delivery.
    Joseph KS; Young DC; Dodds L; O'Connell CM; Allen VM; Chandra S; Allen AC
    Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Oct; 102(4):791-800. PubMed ID: 14551010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Decline in early elective deliveries across the United States.
    Kwong W
    CMAJ; 2014 May; 186(8):E244. PubMed ID: 24733764
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Changes in delivery methods at specialty care hospitals in the United States between 2006 and 2010.
    Danilack VA; Botti JJ; Roach JJ; Savitz DA; Muri JH; Caldwell DL
    J Perinatol; 2013 Dec; 33(12):919-23. PubMed ID: 23929114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Women in the crossfire: forced repeat cesareans.
    Jukelevics N
    Birth; 2002 Jun; 29(2):149-50. PubMed ID: 12000419
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Dutch obstetric intervention study--variations in practice patterns.
    Heres MH; Pel M; Elferink-Stinkens PM; Van Hemel OJ; Treffers PE
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1995 Aug; 50(2):145-50. PubMed ID: 7589749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. "New or not-so-new" labor management practices and cesarean delivery for arrest of progress.
    Nelson DB; Alexander JM; McIntire DD; Leveno KJ
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Jan; 222(1):71.e1-71.e6. PubMed ID: 31336076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Labor induction rate variation in upstate New York: what is the difference?
    Glantz JC
    Birth; 2003 Sep; 30(3):168-74. PubMed ID: 12911799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rates of labor induction and primary cesarean delivery do not correlate with rates of adverse neonatal outcome in level I hospitals.
    Glantz JC
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2011 Apr; 24(4):636-42. PubMed ID: 20836744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Comparison of obstetric prognosis of attempts of breech delivery: Spontaneous labor versus induced labor].
    Breton A; Gueudry P; Branger B; Le Baccon FA; Thubert T; Arthuis C; Winer N; Dochez V
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2018 Sep; 46(9):632-638. PubMed ID: 30170864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparing expectant management and spontaneous labor approaches in studying the effect of labor induction on cesarean delivery.
    Danilack VA; Triche EW; Dore DD; Muri JH; Phipps MG; Savitz DA
    Ann Epidemiol; 2016 Jun; 26(6):405-411.e1. PubMed ID: 27211604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.