These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23282345)

  • 21. A two-year plan for US science.
    Greenberg DS
    Nature; 2010 Oct; 467(7317):781-2. PubMed ID: 20944714
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Uncertainty for UK science ahead of giant spending review.
    Cressey D; Gibney E
    Nature; 2015 Nov; 527(7577):144-5. PubMed ID: 26560276
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Science policy. Group raises hackles as well as funds.
    Lawler A
    Science; 2001 Sep; 293(5536):1747-9. PubMed ID: 11546847
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Republican win sparks fears for science funds.
    Brumfiel G
    Nature; 2002 Nov; 420(6912):113. PubMed ID: 12432355
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Massive science-funding bill passes US Senate - but China focus worries researchers.
    Remmel A
    Nature; 2021 Jun; 594(7864):485. PubMed ID: 34117472
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Italian election leaves science out in the cold.
    Abbott A
    Nature; 2018 Feb; 554(7693):411-412. PubMed ID: 29469119
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Canadian science wins billions in new budget.
    Owens B
    Nature; 2018 Mar; 555(7695):153. PubMed ID: 29517019
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Moderate flies flag for science on Capitol Hill.
    Brumfiel G
    Nature; 2003 Mar; 422(6930):365. PubMed ID: 12660746
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Budget blow to US science.
    Hand E
    Nature; 2008 Jan; 451(7174):2-3. PubMed ID: 18172462
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Budget numbers for US science looking up.
    Hand E; Wadman M
    Nature; 2009 Mar; 458(7234):18. PubMed ID: 19262638
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Lean budget leaves scientists wanting more.
    Brumfiel G; Reichhardt T
    Nature; 2004 Nov; 432(7016):424. PubMed ID: 15565115
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. US government is investing more heavily in science.
    Kresge KJ
    IAVI Rep; 2009; 13(3):2. PubMed ID: 20214313
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Reform by stealth.
    Nature; 2002 Nov; 420(6911):1. PubMed ID: 12422167
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Planning for US science policy in 2009.
    Kalil T
    Nature; 2006 Oct; 443(7113):751-2. PubMed ID: 17051190
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. US science policy: mission impossible?
    Brumfiel G
    Nature; 2004 Mar; 428(6980):250-1. PubMed ID: 15029165
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. 2014 U.S. budget. Request would let science rebound from sequester.
    Mervis J
    Science; 2013 Apr; 340(6130):257. PubMed ID: 23599450
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Republican spending plan casts shadow on science.
    Maxmen A
    Nature; 2012 Aug; 488(7412):441. PubMed ID: 22914144
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Double trouble? To throw cash at science is a mistake.
    Sarewitz D
    Nature; 2010 Nov; 468(7321):135. PubMed ID: 21068785
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. US science faces big chill.
    Semeniuk I; Wadman M; Samuel Reich E; Tollefson J
    Nature; 2011 Jan; 469(7328):9-10. PubMed ID: 21209632
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Science should be ready to jump off 'the cliff'.
    Macilwain C
    Nature; 2012 Nov; 491(7426):639. PubMed ID: 23192107
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.