These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23282582)

  • 1. Blind dates and mate preferences: an analysis of newspaper matchmaking columns.
    Kelley JM; Malouf RA
    Evol Psychol; 2013 Jan; 11(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 23282582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Age preferences in dating advertisements by homosexuals and heterosexuals: from sociobiological to sociological explanations.
    Burrows K
    Arch Sex Behav; 2013 Feb; 42(2):203-11. PubMed ID: 23179236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. What do women's advertised mate preferences reveal? An analysis of video dating profiles.
    Goetz CD
    Evol Psychol; 2013 May; 11(2):383-91. PubMed ID: 23718946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Experimental Evidence for Sex Differences in Sexual Variety Preferences: Support for the Coolidge Effect in Humans.
    Hughes SM; Aung T; Harrison MA; LaFayette JN; Gallup GG
    Arch Sex Behav; 2021 Feb; 50(2):495-509. PubMed ID: 32440927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Homosexual mating preferences from an evolutionary perspective: sexual selection theory revisited.
    Gobrogge KL; Perkins PS; Baker JH; Balcer KD; Breedlove SM; Klump KL
    Arch Sex Behav; 2007 Oct; 36(5):717-23. PubMed ID: 17674179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Infidelity in Dating Relationships: Gender-Specific Correlates of Face-to-Face and Online Extradyadic Involvement.
    Martins A; Pereira M; Andrade R; Dattilio FM; Narciso I; Canavarro MC
    Arch Sex Behav; 2016 Jan; 45(1):193-205. PubMed ID: 26194971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Aspirational pursuit of mates in online dating markets.
    Bruch EE; Newman MEJ
    Sci Adv; 2018 Aug; 4(8):eaap9815. PubMed ID: 30101188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Different cognitive processes underlie human mate choices and mate preferences.
    Todd PM; Penke L; Fasolo B; Lenton AP
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2007 Sep; 104(38):15011-6. PubMed ID: 17827279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Emotional health across the transition to first and second unions among emerging adults.
    Mernitz SE; Dush CK
    J Fam Psychol; 2016 Mar; 30(2):233-44. PubMed ID: 26479896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Are Sex Differences in Preferences for Physical Attractiveness and Good Earning Capacity in Potential Mates Smaller in Countries With Greater Gender Equality?
    Zhang L; Lee AJ; DeBruine LM; Jones BC
    Evol Psychol; 2019; 17(2):1474704919852921. PubMed ID: 31146580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intra-sex Variation in Human Mating Strategies: Different People, Different Tactics.
    Castro FN; Hattori WT; de Araújo Lopes F
    Arch Sex Behav; 2015 Aug; 44(6):1729-36. PubMed ID: 25896490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Knowing your own mate value: sex-specific personality effects on the accuracy of expected mate choices.
    Back MD; Penke L; Schmukle SC; Asendorpf JB
    Psychol Sci; 2011 Aug; 22(8):984-9. PubMed ID: 21724949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of control of resources on magnitudes of sex differences in human mate preferences.
    Moore F; Cassidy C; Perrett DI
    Evol Psychol; 2010 Dec; 8(4):720-35. PubMed ID: 22947829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sex similarities and differences in preferences for short-term mates: what, whether, and why.
    Li NP; Kenrick DT
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2006 Mar; 90(3):468-89. PubMed ID: 16594832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of attractiveness on food sharing preferences in human mating markets.
    Stirrat M; Gumert M; Perrett D
    Evol Psychol; 2011 Mar; 9(1):79-91. PubMed ID: 22947957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of attractiveness and status in dating desire in homosexual and heterosexual men and women.
    Ha T; van den Berg JE; Engels RC; Lichtwarck-Aschoff A
    Arch Sex Behav; 2012 Jun; 41(3):673-82. PubMed ID: 21979410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Rejection hurts: the effect of being dumped on subsequent mating efforts.
    Stanik C; Kurzban R; Ellsworth P
    Evol Psychol; 2010 Nov; 8(4):682-94. PubMed ID: 22947827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Good mates retain us right: investigating the relationship between mate retention strategies, mate value, and relationship satisfaction.
    Salkicevic S; Stanic AL; Grabovac MT
    Evol Psychol; 2014 Dec; 12(5):1038-52. PubMed ID: 25481238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Role of Partner Novelty in Sexual Functioning: A Review.
    Morton H; Gorzalka BB
    J Sex Marital Ther; 2015; 41(6):593-609. PubMed ID: 25222339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Men's Sexual Coerciveness, Perceptions of Women's Attachment, and Dating Preferences.
    Holmgreen L; Oswald DL
    Violence Vict; 2017 Oct; 32(5):935-952. PubMed ID: 28810935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.