401 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23283646)
1. Intraosseous vascular access is safe, effective and costs less than central venous catheters for patients in the hospital setting.
Dolister M; Miller S; Borron S; Truemper E; Shah M; Lanford MR; Philbeck TE
J Vasc Access; 2013; 14(3):216-24. PubMed ID: 23283646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of intraosseous versus central venous vascular access in adults under resuscitation in the emergency department with inaccessible peripheral veins.
Leidel BA; Kirchhoff C; Bogner V; Braunstein V; Biberthaler P; Kanz KG
Resuscitation; 2012 Jan; 83(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 21893125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of success rate and access time for an adult sternal intraosseous device deployed in the prehospital setting.
Byars DV; Tsuchitani SN; Erwin E; Anglemyer B; Eastman J
Prehosp Disaster Med; 2011 Apr; 26(2):127-9. PubMed ID: 21888733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Intraosseous devices: a randomized controlled trial comparing three intraosseous devices.
Hartholt KA; van Lieshout EM; Thies WC; Patka P; Schipper IB
Prehosp Emerg Care; 2010; 14(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 19947861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The intraosseous have it: A prospective observational study of vascular access success rates in patients in extremis using video review.
Chreiman KM; Dumas RP; Seamon MJ; Kim PK; Reilly PM; Kaplan LJ; Christie JD; Holena DN
J Trauma Acute Care Surg; 2018 Apr; 84(4):558-563. PubMed ID: 29300281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Moving the needle on time to resuscitation: An EAST prospective multicenter study of vascular access in hypotensive injured patients using trauma video review.
Dumas RP; Vella MA; Maiga AW; Erickson CR; Dennis BM; da Luz LT; Pannell D; Quigley E; Velopulos CG; Hendzlik P; Marinica A; Bruce N; Margolick J; Butler DF; Estroff J; Zebley JA; Alexander A; Mitchell S; Grossman Verner HM; Truitt M; Berry S; Middlekauff J; Luce S; Leshikar D; Krowsoski L; Bukur M; Polite NM; McMann AH; Staszak R; Armen SB; Horrigan T; Moore FO; Bjordahl P; Guido J; Mathew S; Diaz BF; Mooney J; Hebeler K; Holena DN
J Trauma Acute Care Surg; 2023 Jul; 95(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 37012624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Are early cannulation arteriovenous grafts (ecAVG) a viable alternative to tunnelled central venous catheters (TCVCs)? An observational "virtual study" and budget impact analysis.
Aitken E; Iqbal K; Thomson P; Kasthuri R; Kingsmore D
J Vasc Access; 2016 May; 17(3):220-8. PubMed ID: 27032450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. EZ-IO(®) intraosseous device implementation in a pre-hospital emergency service: A prospective study and review of the literature.
Santos D; Carron PN; Yersin B; Pasquier M
Resuscitation; 2013 Apr; 84(4):440-5. PubMed ID: 23160104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of two intraosseous access devices in adult patients under resuscitation in the emergency department: A prospective, randomized study.
Leidel BA; Kirchhoff C; Braunstein V; Bogner V; Biberthaler P; Kanz KG
Resuscitation; 2010 Aug; 81(8):994-9. PubMed ID: 20434823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Proximal humerus intraosseous infusion: a preferred emergency venous access.
Paxton JH; Knuth TE; Klausner HA
J Trauma; 2009 Sep; 67(3):606-11. PubMed ID: 19741408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. New choices for central venous catheters: potential financial implications.
Shorr AF; Humphreys CW; Helman DL
Chest; 2003 Jul; 124(1):275-84. PubMed ID: 12853534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intraosseous access EZ-IO in a prehospital emergency service.
Torres F; Galán MD; Alonso Mdel M; Suárez R; Camacho C; Almagro V
J Emerg Nurs; 2013 Sep; 39(5):511-4. PubMed ID: 23099011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Electrocardiographic-guided tip positioning technique for peripherally inserted central catheters in a Dutch teaching hospital: Feasibility and cost-effectiveness analysis in a prospective cohort study.
Bloemen A; Daniels AM; Samyn MG; Janssen RJ; Elshof JW
J Vasc Access; 2018 Nov; 19(6):578-584. PubMed ID: 29560814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of two intraosseous devices in adult patients in the emergency setting: a pilot study.
Demir OF; Aydin K; Akay H; Erbil B; Karcioglu O; Gulalp B
Eur J Emerg Med; 2016 Apr; 23(2):137-42. PubMed ID: 25075979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Changing concepts in long-term central venous access: catheter selection and cost savings.
Horattas MC; Trupiano J; Hopkins S; Pasini D; Martino C; Murty A
Am J Infect Control; 2001 Feb; 29(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 11172316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Paramedics successfully perform humeral EZ-IO intraosseous access in adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients.
Wampler D; Schwartz D; Shumaker J; Bolleter S; Beckett R; Manifold C
Am J Emerg Med; 2012 Sep; 30(7):1095-9. PubMed ID: 22030185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison between sedation room and operating room in central venous catheter positioning in children.
Chiaretti A; Pittiruti M; Sassudelli G; Conti G; Rossi M; Pulitanò SM; Mancino A; Pusateri A; Gatto A; Tosi F
J Vasc Access; 2021 Mar; 22(2):184-188. PubMed ID: 32564667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. EZ-IO(®) intraosseous device implementation in German Helicopter Emergency Medical Service.
Helm M; Haunstein B; Schlechtriemen T; Ruppert M; Lampl L; Gäßler M
Resuscitation; 2015 Mar; 88():43-7. PubMed ID: 25553609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of infections and complications in central venous catheters in adults with solid tumours.
Coady K; Ali M; Sidloff D; Kenningham RR; Ahmed S
J Vasc Access; 2015; 16(1):38-41. PubMed ID: 25198809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Uses and complications of central venous catheters inserted in a pediatric emergency department.
Chiang VW; Baskin MN
Pediatr Emerg Care; 2000 Aug; 16(4):230-2. PubMed ID: 10966338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
