These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
403 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23283646)
1. Intraosseous vascular access is safe, effective and costs less than central venous catheters for patients in the hospital setting. Dolister M; Miller S; Borron S; Truemper E; Shah M; Lanford MR; Philbeck TE J Vasc Access; 2013; 14(3):216-24. PubMed ID: 23283646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of intraosseous versus central venous vascular access in adults under resuscitation in the emergency department with inaccessible peripheral veins. Leidel BA; Kirchhoff C; Bogner V; Braunstein V; Biberthaler P; Kanz KG Resuscitation; 2012 Jan; 83(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 21893125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of success rate and access time for an adult sternal intraosseous device deployed in the prehospital setting. Byars DV; Tsuchitani SN; Erwin E; Anglemyer B; Eastman J Prehosp Disaster Med; 2011 Apr; 26(2):127-9. PubMed ID: 21888733 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The intraosseous have it: A prospective observational study of vascular access success rates in patients in extremis using video review. Chreiman KM; Dumas RP; Seamon MJ; Kim PK; Reilly PM; Kaplan LJ; Christie JD; Holena DN J Trauma Acute Care Surg; 2018 Apr; 84(4):558-563. PubMed ID: 29300281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Moving the needle on time to resuscitation: An EAST prospective multicenter study of vascular access in hypotensive injured patients using trauma video review. Dumas RP; Vella MA; Maiga AW; Erickson CR; Dennis BM; da Luz LT; Pannell D; Quigley E; Velopulos CG; Hendzlik P; Marinica A; Bruce N; Margolick J; Butler DF; Estroff J; Zebley JA; Alexander A; Mitchell S; Grossman Verner HM; Truitt M; Berry S; Middlekauff J; Luce S; Leshikar D; Krowsoski L; Bukur M; Polite NM; McMann AH; Staszak R; Armen SB; Horrigan T; Moore FO; Bjordahl P; Guido J; Mathew S; Diaz BF; Mooney J; Hebeler K; Holena DN J Trauma Acute Care Surg; 2023 Jul; 95(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 37012624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Are early cannulation arteriovenous grafts (ecAVG) a viable alternative to tunnelled central venous catheters (TCVCs)? An observational "virtual study" and budget impact analysis. Aitken E; Iqbal K; Thomson P; Kasthuri R; Kingsmore D J Vasc Access; 2016 May; 17(3):220-8. PubMed ID: 27032450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. EZ-IO(®) intraosseous device implementation in a pre-hospital emergency service: A prospective study and review of the literature. Santos D; Carron PN; Yersin B; Pasquier M Resuscitation; 2013 Apr; 84(4):440-5. PubMed ID: 23160104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of two intraosseous access devices in adult patients under resuscitation in the emergency department: A prospective, randomized study. Leidel BA; Kirchhoff C; Braunstein V; Bogner V; Biberthaler P; Kanz KG Resuscitation; 2010 Aug; 81(8):994-9. PubMed ID: 20434823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. New choices for central venous catheters: potential financial implications. Shorr AF; Humphreys CW; Helman DL Chest; 2003 Jul; 124(1):275-84. PubMed ID: 12853534 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intraosseous access EZ-IO in a prehospital emergency service. Torres F; Galán MD; Alonso Mdel M; Suárez R; Camacho C; Almagro V J Emerg Nurs; 2013 Sep; 39(5):511-4. PubMed ID: 23099011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Electrocardiographic-guided tip positioning technique for peripherally inserted central catheters in a Dutch teaching hospital: Feasibility and cost-effectiveness analysis in a prospective cohort study. Bloemen A; Daniels AM; Samyn MG; Janssen RJ; Elshof JW J Vasc Access; 2018 Nov; 19(6):578-584. PubMed ID: 29560814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of two intraosseous devices in adult patients in the emergency setting: a pilot study. Demir OF; Aydin K; Akay H; Erbil B; Karcioglu O; Gulalp B Eur J Emerg Med; 2016 Apr; 23(2):137-42. PubMed ID: 25075979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Changing concepts in long-term central venous access: catheter selection and cost savings. Horattas MC; Trupiano J; Hopkins S; Pasini D; Martino C; Murty A Am J Infect Control; 2001 Feb; 29(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 11172316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison between sedation room and operating room in central venous catheter positioning in children. Chiaretti A; Pittiruti M; Sassudelli G; Conti G; Rossi M; Pulitanò SM; Mancino A; Pusateri A; Gatto A; Tosi F J Vasc Access; 2021 Mar; 22(2):184-188. PubMed ID: 32564667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. EZ-IO(®) intraosseous device implementation in German Helicopter Emergency Medical Service. Helm M; Haunstein B; Schlechtriemen T; Ruppert M; Lampl L; Gäßler M Resuscitation; 2015 Mar; 88():43-7. PubMed ID: 25553609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of infections and complications in central venous catheters in adults with solid tumours. Coady K; Ali M; Sidloff D; Kenningham RR; Ahmed S J Vasc Access; 2015; 16(1):38-41. PubMed ID: 25198809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Uses and complications of central venous catheters inserted in a pediatric emergency department. Chiang VW; Baskin MN Pediatr Emerg Care; 2000 Aug; 16(4):230-2. PubMed ID: 10966338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]