These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23283755)
1. Field demonstration and evaluation of the Passive Flux Meter on a CAH groundwater plume. Verreydt G; Annable MD; Kaskassian S; Van Keer I; Bronders J; Diels L; Vanderauwera P Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2013 Jul; 20(7):4621-34. PubMed ID: 23283755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Field-scale evaluation of the passive flux meter for simultaneous measurement of groundwater and contaminant fluxes. Annable MD; Hatfield K; Cho J; Klammler H; Parker BL; Cherry JA; Rao PS Environ Sci Technol; 2005 Sep; 39(18):7194-201. PubMed ID: 16201648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mass discharge assessment at a brominated DNAPL site: Effects of known DNAPL source mass removal. Johnston CD; Davis GB; Bastow TP; Woodbury RJ; Rao PS; Annable MD; Rhodes S J Contam Hydrol; 2014 Aug; 164():100-13. PubMed ID: 24973505 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Oxyanion flux characterization using passive flux meters: development and field testing of surfactant-modified granular activated carbon. Lee J; Rao PS; Poyer IC; Toole RM; Annable MD; Hatfield K J Contam Hydrol; 2007 Jul; 92(3-4):208-29. PubMed ID: 17316893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Flux-based assessment at a manufacturing site contaminated with trichloroethylene. Basu NB; Rao PS; Poyer IC; Annable MD; Hatfield K J Contam Hydrol; 2006 Jun; 86(1-2):105-27. PubMed ID: 16581154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of deep vadose zone contaminant flux into groundwater: Approach and case study. Oostrom M; Truex MJ; Last GV; Strickland CE; Tartakovsky GD J Contam Hydrol; 2016 Jun; 189():27-43. PubMed ID: 27107320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Architecture, persistence and dissolution of a 20 to 45 year old trichloroethene DNAPL source zone. Rivett MO; Dearden RA; Wealthall GP J Contam Hydrol; 2014 Dec; 170():95-115. PubMed ID: 25444120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of temporally variable groundwater flow conditions on point measurements and contaminant mass flux estimations. Rein A; Bauer S; Dietrich P; Beyer C J Contam Hydrol; 2009 Sep; 108(3-4):118-33. PubMed ID: 19682766 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Monitoring well utility in a heterogeneous DNAPL source zone area: Insights from proximal multilevel sampler wells and sampling capture-zone modelling. McMillan LA; Rivett MO; Wealthall GP; Zeeb P; Dumble P J Contam Hydrol; 2018 Mar; 210():15-30. PubMed ID: 29475775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Groundwater Flow Field Distortion by Monitoring Wells and Passive Flux Meters. Verreydt G; Bronders J; Van Keer I; Diels L; Vanderauwera P Ground Water; 2015; 53(6):933-42. PubMed ID: 25565034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Changes in contaminant mass discharge from DNAPL source mass depletion: evaluation at two field sites. Brooks MC; Wood AL; Annable MD; Hatfield K; Cho J; Holbert C; Rao PS; Enfield CG; Lynch K; Smith RE J Contam Hydrol; 2008 Nov; 102(1-2):140-53. PubMed ID: 18632182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Magnitude and directional measures of water and Cr(VI) fluxes by passive flux meter. Campbell TJ; Hatfield K; Klammler H; Annable MD; Rao PS Environ Sci Technol; 2006 Oct; 40(20):6392-7. PubMed ID: 17120570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A PCE groundwater plume discharging to a river: influence of the streambed and near-river zone on contaminant distributions. Conant B; Cherry JA; Gillham RW J Contam Hydrol; 2004 Sep; 73(1-4):249-79. PubMed ID: 15336797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A direct passive method for measuring water and contaminant fluxes in porous media. Hatfield K; Annable M; Cho J; Rao PS; Klammler H J Contam Hydrol; 2004 Dec; 75(3-4):155-81. PubMed ID: 15610899 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Significance of groundwater flux on contaminant concentration and mass discharge in the nonaqueous phase liquid (NAPL) contaminated zone. Zhu J; Sun D J Contam Hydrol; 2016 Sep; 192():158-164. PubMed ID: 27500747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Source-zone characterization of a chlorinated-solvent contaminated Superfund site in Tucson, AZ. Brusseau ML; Nelson NT; Zhang Z; Blue JE; Rohrer J; Allen T J Contam Hydrol; 2007 Feb; 90(1-2):21-40. PubMed ID: 17049404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The use of mass depletion-mass flux reduction relationships during pumping to determine source zone mass of a reactive brominated-solvent DNAPL. Johnston CD; Davis GB; Bastow TP; Annable MD; Trefry MG; Furness A; Geste Y; Woodbury RJ; Rao PS; Rhodes S J Contam Hydrol; 2013 Jan; 144(1):122-37. PubMed ID: 23247401 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Application of new point measurement device to quantify groundwater-surface water interactions. Cremeans MM; Devlin JF; McKnight US; Bjerg PL J Contam Hydrol; 2018 Apr; 211():85-93. PubMed ID: 29605159 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Enhanced aqueous dissolution of a DNAPL source to characterize the source strength function. Wang F; Annable MD; Schaefer CE; Ault TD; Cho J; Jawitz JW J Contam Hydrol; 2014 Nov; 169():75-89. PubMed ID: 25115451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]