These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

279 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23285951)

  • 21. [The music quality feeling and music perception of adult cochlear implant recipients].
    Zhou Q; Gu X; Liu B
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jan; 33(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 30669198
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Clinical assessment of music perception in Korean cochlear implant listeners.
    Jung KH; Cho YS; Cho JK; Park GY; Kim EY; Hong SH; Chung WH; Won JH; Rubinstein JT
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2010 Jun; 130(6):716-23. PubMed ID: 19958251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Musical and vocal emotion perception for cochlear implants users.
    Paquette S; Ahmed GD; Goffi-Gomez MV; Hoshino ACH; Peretz I; Lehmann A
    Hear Res; 2018 Dec; 370():272-282. PubMed ID: 30181063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Speech and pitch perception with the new fine structure speech coding strategy].
    Gu P; Xi X; Han D; Hong M; Wang Q; Yang S; Dai P
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 May; 27(10):481-4. PubMed ID: 23937013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Assessment of sound quality perception in cochlear implant users during music listening.
    Roy AT; Jiradejvong P; Carver C; Limb CJ
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Apr; 33(3):319-27. PubMed ID: 22314920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Predicting emotion perception abilities for cochlear implant users.
    Paquette S; Deroche MLD; Goffi-Gomez MV; Hoshino ACH; Lehmann A
    Int J Audiol; 2023 Oct; 62(10):946-954. PubMed ID: 36047767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Contribution of hearing aids to music perception by cochlear implant users.
    Peterson N; Bergeson TR
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Sep; 16 Suppl 3():S71-8. PubMed ID: 26561890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The MuSIC perception test: a novel battery for testing music perception of cochlear implant users.
    Brockmeier SJ; Fitzgerald D; Searle O; Fitzgerald H; Grasmeder M; Hilbig S; Vermiere K; Peterreins M; Heydner S; Arnold W
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2011 Feb; 12(1):10-20. PubMed ID: 21756454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Children with bilateral cochlear implants identify emotion in speech and music.
    Volkova A; Trehub SE; Schellenberg EG; Papsin BC; Gordon KA
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2013 Mar; 14(2):80-91. PubMed ID: 23453221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effect of cochlear implantation on music perception by adults with usable pre-operative acoustic hearing.
    Looi V; McDermott H; McKay C; Hickson L
    Int J Audiol; 2008 May; 47(5):257-68. PubMed ID: 18465410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Perception of the pitch and naturalness of popular music by cochlear implant users.
    Grasmeder ML; Verschuur CA
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Sep; 16 Suppl 3():S79-90. PubMed ID: 26561891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [A review of research on music perception ability for adult cochlear implant users].
    Liu Z; Liu B; Wang S
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Nov; 26(22):1053-6. PubMed ID: 23379124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Free field frequency discrimination abilities of cochlear implant users.
    Pretorius LL; Hanekom JJ
    Hear Res; 2008 Oct; 244(1-2):77-84. PubMed ID: 18692556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A music quality rating test battery for cochlear implant users to compare the FSP and HDCIS strategies for music appreciation.
    Looi V; Winter P; Anderson I; Sucher C
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Aug; 50(8):503-18. PubMed ID: 21689048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The intensity-pitch relation revisited: monopolar versus bipolar cochlear stimulation.
    Arnoldner C; Riss D; Kaider A; Mair A; Wagenblast J; Baumgartner WD; Gstöttner W; Hamzavi JS
    Laryngoscope; 2008 Sep; 118(9):1630-6. PubMed ID: 18545213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Predicting social functioning in children with a cochlear implant and in normal-hearing children: the role of emotion regulation.
    Wiefferink CH; Rieffe C; Ketelaar L; Frijns JH
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Jun; 76(6):883-9. PubMed ID: 22459035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of musical activities of cochlear implant users with different speech-coding strategies.
    Brockmeier SJ; Grasmeder M; Passow S; Mawmann D; Vischer M; Jappel A; Baumgartner W; Stark T; Müller J; Brill S; Steffens T; Strutz J; Kiefer J; Baumann U; Arnold W
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2 Suppl):49S-51S. PubMed ID: 17496646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. From fragments to the whole: a comparison between cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners in music perception and enjoyment.
    Alexander AJ; Bartel L; Friesen L; Shipp D; Chen J
    J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2011 Feb; 40(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 21303594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Use of the Phantom Electrode strategy to improve bass frequency perception for music listening in cochlear implant users.
    Munjal T; Roy AT; Carver C; Jiradejvong P; Limb CJ
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Sep; 16 Suppl 3():S121-8. PubMed ID: 26561883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Adult Cochlear Implant Users Are Able to Discriminate Basic Tonal Features in Musical Patterns: Evidence From Event-related Potentials.
    Hahne A; Mainka A; Leuner A; Mürbe D
    Otol Neurotol; 2016 Oct; 37(9):e360-8. PubMed ID: 27631660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.