These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23286135)

  • 1. Dominant component analysis of electrophysiological connectivity networks.
    Ghanbari Y; Bloy L; Batmanghelich K; Roberts TP; Verma R
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2012; 15(Pt 3):231-8. PubMed ID: 23286135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Functionally driven brain networks using multi-layer graph clustering.
    Ghanbari Y; Bloy L; Shankar V; Edgar JC; Roberts TP; Schultz RT; Verma R
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2014; 17(Pt 3):113-20. PubMed ID: 25320789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Identifying group discriminative and age regressive sub-networks from DTI-based connectivity via a unified framework of non-negative matrix factorization and graph embedding.
    Ghanbari Y; Smith AR; Schultz RT; Verma R
    Med Image Anal; 2014 Dec; 18(8):1337-48. PubMed ID: 25037933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Graph theoretical analysis of resting-state MEG data: Identifying interhemispheric connectivity and the default mode.
    Maldjian JA; Davenport EM; Whitlow CT
    Neuroimage; 2014 Aug; 96():88-94. PubMed ID: 24699016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Locality preserving non-negative basis learning with graph embedding.
    Ghanbari Y; Herrington J; Gur RC; Schultz RT; Verma R
    Inf Process Med Imaging; 2013; 23():316-27. PubMed ID: 24683979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Using multiparametric data with missing features for learning patterns of pathology.
    Ingalhalikar M; Parker WA; Bloy L; Roberts TP; Verma R
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2012; 15(Pt 3):468-75. PubMed ID: 23286164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Connectivity subnetwork learning for pathology and developmental variations.
    Ghanbari Y; Smith AR; Schultz RT; Verma R
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2013; 16(Pt 1):90-7. PubMed ID: 24505653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Identification of MCI using optimal sparse MAR modeled effective connectivity networks.
    Wee CY; Li Y; Jie B; Peng ZW; Shen D
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2013; 16(Pt 2):319-327. PubMed ID: 24579156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Salience network-based classification and prediction of symptom severity in children with autism.
    Uddin LQ; Supekar K; Lynch CJ; Khouzam A; Phillips J; Feinstein C; Ryali S; Menon V
    JAMA Psychiatry; 2013 Aug; 70(8):869-79. PubMed ID: 23803651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dynamic Functional Network Connectivity in Schizophrenia with Magnetoencephalography and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Do Different Timescales Tell a Different Story?
    Sanfratello L; Houck JM; Calhoun VD
    Brain Connect; 2019 Apr; 9(3):251-262. PubMed ID: 30632385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Functional connectivity measured with magnetoencephalography identifies persons with HIV disease.
    Becker JT; Bajo R; Fabrizio M; Sudre G; Cuesta P; Aizenstein HJ; Lopez OL; Wolk D; Parkkonen L; Maestu F; Bagic A
    Brain Imaging Behav; 2012 Sep; 6(3):366-73. PubMed ID: 22328062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Generalized RAICAR: discover homogeneous subject (sub)groups by reproducibility of their intrinsic connectivity networks.
    Yang Z; Zuo XN; Wang P; Li Z; LaConte SM; Bandettini PA; Hu XP
    Neuroimage; 2012 Oct; 63(1):403-14. PubMed ID: 22789741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Group search algorithm recovers effective connectivity maps for individuals in homogeneous and heterogeneous samples.
    Gates KM; Molenaar PC
    Neuroimage; 2012 Oct; 63(1):310-9. PubMed ID: 22732562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Group-level spatial independent component analysis of Fourier envelopes of resting-state MEG data.
    Ramkumar P; Parkkonen L; Hyvärinen A
    Neuroimage; 2014 Feb; 86():480-91. PubMed ID: 24185028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A blind deconvolution approach to recover effective connectivity brain networks from resting state fMRI data.
    Wu GR; Liao W; Stramaglia S; Ding JR; Chen H; Marinazzo D
    Med Image Anal; 2013 Apr; 17(3):365-74. PubMed ID: 23422254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Group differences in MEG-ICA derived resting state networks: Application to major depressive disorder.
    Nugent AC; Robinson SE; Coppola R; Furey ML; Zarate CA
    Neuroimage; 2015 Sep; 118():1-12. PubMed ID: 26032890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reliability of Magnetoencephalography and High-Density Electroencephalography Resting-State Functional Connectivity Metrics.
    Marquetand J; Vannoni S; Carboni M; Li Hegner Y; Stier C; Braun C; Focke NK
    Brain Connect; 2019 Sep; 9(7):539-553. PubMed ID: 31115272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using variance information in magnetoencephalography measures of functional connectivity.
    Hall EL; Woolrich MW; Thomaz CE; Morris PG; Brookes MJ
    Neuroimage; 2013 Feb; 67():203-12. PubMed ID: 23165323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Towards a Quantified Network Portrait of a Population.
    Tunç B; Shankar V; Parker D; Schultz RT; Verma R
    Inf Process Med Imaging; 2015; 24():650-61. PubMed ID: 26221710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Functional connectivity networks in the autistic and healthy brain assessed using Granger causality.
    Pollonini L; Patidar U; Situ N; Rezaie R; Papanicolaou AC; Zouridakis G
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():1730-3. PubMed ID: 21096408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.