BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23286227)

  • 1. Comparative analysis of homology models of the AH receptor ligand binding domain: verification of structure-function predictions by site-directed mutagenesis of a nonfunctional receptor.
    Fraccalvieri D; Soshilov AA; Karchner SI; Franks DG; Pandini A; Bonati L; Hahn ME; Denison MS
    Biochemistry; 2013 Jan; 52(4):714-25. PubMed ID: 23286227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Specific ligand binding domain residues confer low dioxin responsiveness to AHR1β of Xenopus laevis.
    Odio C; Holzman SA; Denison MS; Fraccalvieri D; Bonati L; Franks DG; Hahn ME; Powell WH
    Biochemistry; 2013 Mar; 52(10):1746-54. PubMed ID: 23394719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Detection of the TCDD binding-fingerprint within the Ah receptor ligand binding domain by structurally driven mutagenesis and functional analysis.
    Pandini A; Soshilov AA; Song Y; Zhao J; Bonati L; Denison MS
    Biochemistry; 2009 Jun; 48(25):5972-83. PubMed ID: 19456125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative In Vitro and In Silico Analysis of the Selectivity of Indirubin as a Human Ah Receptor Agonist.
    Faber SC; Soshilov AA; Giani Tagliabue S; Bonati L; Denison MS
    Int J Mol Sci; 2018 Sep; 19(9):. PubMed ID: 30201897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Characterization of the region of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor required for ligand dependency of transactivation using chimeric receptor between Drosophila and Mus musculus.
    Kudo K; Takeuchi T; Murakami Y; Ebina M; Kikuchi H
    Biochim Biophys Acta; 2009; 1789(6-8):477-86. PubMed ID: 19560568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. New aryl hydrocarbon receptor homology model targeted to improve docking reliability.
    Motto I; Bordogna A; Soshilov AA; Denison MS; Bonati L
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Nov; 51(11):2868-81. PubMed ID: 21981577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In silico analysis of the interaction of avian aryl hydrocarbon receptors and dioxins to decipher isoform-, ligand-, and species-specific activations.
    Hirano M; Hwang JH; Park HJ; Bak SM; Iwata H; Kim EY
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Mar; 49(6):3795-804. PubMed ID: 25692546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The tertiary structures of porcine AhR and ARNT proteins and molecular interactions within the TCDD/AhR/ARNT complex.
    Orlowska K; Molcan T; Swigonska S; Sadowska A; Jablonska M; Nynca A; Jastrzebski JP; Ciereszko RE
    J Mol Graph Model; 2016 Jun; 67():119-26. PubMed ID: 27288759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Structural and functional characterization of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor ligand binding domain by homology modeling and mutational analysis.
    Pandini A; Denison MS; Song Y; Soshilov AA; Bonati L
    Biochemistry; 2007 Jan; 46(3):696-708. PubMed ID: 17223691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An aryl hydrocarbon receptor from the caecilian Gymnopis multiplicata suggests low dioxin affinity in the ancestor of all three amphibian orders.
    Kazzaz SA; Giani Tagliabue S; Franks DG; Denison MS; Hahn ME; Bonati L; Powell WH
    Gen Comp Endocrinol; 2020 Dec; 299():113592. PubMed ID: 32858041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. AHR2 mutant reveals functional diversity of aryl hydrocarbon receptors in zebrafish.
    Goodale BC; La Du JK; Bisson WH; Janszen DB; Waters KM; Tanguay RL
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(1):e29346. PubMed ID: 22242167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. AHR1B, a new functional aryl hydrocarbon receptor in zebrafish: tandem arrangement of ahr1b and ahr2 genes.
    Karchner SI; Franks DG; Hahn ME
    Biochem J; 2005 Nov; 392(Pt 1):153-61. PubMed ID: 16042621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The molecular basis for differential dioxin sensitivity in birds: role of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor.
    Karchner SI; Franks DG; Kennedy SW; Hahn ME
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2006 Apr; 103(16):6252-7. PubMed ID: 16606854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Cellular and Molecular Determinants of Naphthoquinone-Dependent Activation of the Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor.
    Faber SC; Giani Tagliabue S; Bonati L; Denison MS
    Int J Mol Sci; 2020 Jun; 21(11):. PubMed ID: 32526934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor from the Salamander Ambystoma mexicanum Exhibits Low Sensitivity to 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin.
    Shoots J; Fraccalvieri D; Franks DG; Denison MS; Hahn ME; Bonati L; Powell WH
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Jun; 49(11):6993-7001. PubMed ID: 25941739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Molecular and functional characterization of a novel aryl hydrocarbon receptor isoform, AHR1β, in the chicken (Gallus gallus).
    Lee JS; Iwabuchi K; Nomaru K; Nagahama N; Kim EY; Iwata H
    Toxicol Sci; 2013 Dec; 136(2):450-66. PubMed ID: 23997109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Auto-induction mechanism of aryl hydrocarbon receptor 2 (AHR2) gene by TCDD-activated AHR1 and AHR2 in the red seabream (Pagrus major).
    Bak SM; Iida M; Soshilov AA; Denison MS; Iwata H; Kim EY
    Arch Toxicol; 2017 Jan; 91(1):301-312. PubMed ID: 27188387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Correlation between TCDD acute toxicity and aryl hydrocarbon receptor structure for different mammals.
    Wang Y; Wang Q; Wu B; Li Y; Lu G
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2013 Mar; 89():84-8. PubMed ID: 23266373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Identification of the Ah-receptor structural determinants for ligand preferences.
    Xing Y; Nukaya M; Satyshur KA; Jiang L; Stanevich V; Korkmaz EN; Burdette L; Kennedy GD; Cui Q; Bradfield CA
    Toxicol Sci; 2012 Sep; 129(1):86-97. PubMed ID: 22659362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. cDNA cloning and characterization of an aryl hydrocarbon receptor from the harbor seal (Phoca vitulina): a biomarker of dioxin susceptibility?
    Kim EY; Hahn ME
    Aquat Toxicol; 2002 Jul; 58(1-2):57-73. PubMed ID: 12062155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.