203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23286314)
21. Comparison of Different Small Clinical Hematology Laboratory Configurations With Focus on Remote Smear Imaging.
Stephens L; Bevins NJ; Bengtsson HI; Broome HE
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2019 Oct; 143(10):1234-1245. PubMed ID: 30969157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Performance evaluation and relevance of the CellaVision DM96 system in routine analysis and in patients with malignant hematological diseases.
Cornet E; Perol JP; Troussard X
Int J Lab Hematol; 2008 Dec; 30(6):536-42. PubMed ID: 18983307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Blast flagging of the Sysmex XN-10 hematology analyzer with supervised cell image analysis: Impact on quality parameters.
Petrone J; Jackups R; Eby CS; Shimer G; Anderson J; Frater JL
Int J Lab Hematol; 2019 Oct; 41(5):601-606. PubMed ID: 31162809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Platelet count estimation using the CellaVision DM96 system.
Gao Y; Mansoor A; Wood B; Nelson H; Higa D; Naugler C
J Pathol Inform; 2013; 4():16. PubMed ID: 23858391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Evaluation of the detection of blasts by Sysmex hematology instruments, CellaVision DM96, and manual microscopy using flow cytometry as the confirmatory method.
Eilertsen H; Saether PC; Henriksson CE; Petersen AS; Hagve TA
Int J Lab Hematol; 2019 Jun; 41(3):338-344. PubMed ID: 30742354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A survey study of benefits and limitations of using CellaVision DM96 for peripheral blood differentials.
VanVranken SJ; Patterson ES; Rudmann SV; Waller KV
Clin Lab Sci; 2014; 27(1):32-9. PubMed ID: 24669444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Performance evaluation of the digital morphology analyser Sysmex DI-60 for white blood cell differentials in abnormal samples.
Zhao Y; Diao Y; Zheng J; Li X; Luan H
Sci Rep; 2024 Jun; 14(1):14344. PubMed ID: 38906933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Accuracy of the CellaVision DM96 platform for reticulocyte counting.
Mahe ER; Higa D; Naugler C; Mansoor A; Shabani-Rad MT
J Pathol Inform; 2014; 5(1):17. PubMed ID: 25057431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Experience with CellaVision DM96 for peripheral blood differentials in a large multi-center academic hospital system.
Rollins-Raval MA; Raval JS; Contis L
J Pathol Inform; 2012; 3():29. PubMed ID: 23024888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Clinical application of automated digital image analysis for morphology review of peripheral blood leukocyte].
Xing Y; Yan X; Pu C; Shang K; Dong N; Wang R; Wang J
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Mar; 96(8):634-9. PubMed ID: 26932858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Evaluation of schistocyte analysis by a novel automated digital cell morphology application.
Hervent AS; Godefroid M; Cauwelier B; Billiet J; Emmerechts J
Int J Lab Hematol; 2015 Oct; 37(5):588-96. PubMed ID: 25923397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Detection of Platelet Clumps on Peripheral Blood Smears by CellaVision DM96 System and Microscopic Review.
Gulati G; Uppal G; Florea AD; Gong J
Lab Med; 2014; 45(4):368-71. PubMed ID: 25316670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Toward a reference method for leukocyte differential counts in blood: comparison of three flow cytometric candidate methods.
Roussel M; Davis BH; Fest T; Wood BL;
Cytometry A; 2012 Nov; 81(11):973-82. PubMed ID: 22736499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Performance evaluation of the automated morphological analysis of erythrocytes by CellaVision DM96.
Maenou I; Tabe Y; Bengtsson HI; Ishii K; Miyake K; Horiuchi Y; Idei M; Horii T; Satoh N; Miida T; Ohsaka A
Clin Lab; 2013; 59(11-12):1413-7. PubMed ID: 24409679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Analytic performance of the PENTRA 80 automated blood cell analyzer for the evaluation of normal and pathologic WBCs.
Arroyo ME; Tabernero MD; García-Marcos MA; Orfao A
Am J Clin Pathol; 2005 Feb; 123(2):206-14. PubMed ID: 15842044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Reliable, accurate determination of the leukocyte differential of leukopenic samples by using Hematoflow method.
Jo Y; Kim SH; Koh K; Park J; Shim YB; Lim J; Kim Y; Park YJ; Han K
Korean J Lab Med; 2011 Jul; 31(3):131-7. PubMed ID: 21779183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Studies on the efficient application by STKS and 8200].
Mishima S; Unshima T; Yoshida Y; Endo J
Rinsho Byori; 1992 Jun; 40(6):577-85. PubMed ID: 1513029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Evaluation of the CellaVision DM96 advanced RBC application for screening and follow-up of malaria infection.
Florin L; Maelegheer K; Muyldermans A; Van Esbroeck M; Nulens E; Emmerechts J
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2018 Apr; 90(4):253-256. PubMed ID: 29317138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Performance evaluation of the digital cell imaging analyzer DI-60 integrated into the fully automated Sysmex XN hematology analyzer system.
Tabe Y; Yamamoto T; Maenou I; Nakai R; Idei M; Horii T; Miida T; Ohsaka A
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2015 Feb; 53(2):281-9. PubMed ID: 25153399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Digital Morphology Analyzer Sysmex DI-60 vs. Manual Counting for White Blood Cell Differentials in Leukopenic Samples: A Comparative Assessment of Risk and Turnaround Time.
Nam M; Yoon S; Hur M; Lee GH; Kim H; Park M; Kim HN
Ann Lab Med; 2022 Jul; 42(4):398-405. PubMed ID: 35177560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
