277 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23286316)
1. Two-in-one fuel combining sugar cane with low rank coal and its CO₂ reduction effects in pulverized-coal power plants.
Lee DW; Bae JS; Lee YJ; Park SJ; Hong JC; Lee BH; Jeon CH; Choi YC
Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Feb; 47(3):1704-10. PubMed ID: 23286316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Coal and biomass to fuels and power.
Williams RH; Liu G; Kreutz TG; Larson ED
Annu Rev Chem Biomol Eng; 2011; 2():529-53. PubMed ID: 22432630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Co-gasification of solid waste and lignite - a case study for Western Macedonia.
Koukouzas N; Katsiadakis A; Karlopoulos E; Kakaras E
Waste Manag; 2008; 28(7):1263-75. PubMed ID: 17631995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Energetic valorization of wood waste: estimation of the reduction in CO2 emissions.
Vanneste J; Van Gerven T; Vander Putten E; Van der Bruggen B; Helsen L
Sci Total Environ; 2011 Sep; 409(19):3595-602. PubMed ID: 21719072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prospects and issues of integration of co-combustion of solid fuels (coal and biomass) in chemical looping technology.
Bhui B; Vairakannu P
J Environ Manage; 2019 Feb; 231():1241-1256. PubMed ID: 30602249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Low-carbon technological innovation of coal production and utilization impetus carbon neutrality in China.
Wang S; Chen F; Wang Y
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Jul; 30(33):80916-80930. PubMed ID: 37310598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Options for near-term phaseout of CO(2) emissions from coal use in the United States.
Kharecha PA; Kutscher CF; Hansen JE; Mazria E
Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Jun; 44(11):4050-62. PubMed ID: 20429611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Shea meal and cotton stalk as potential fuels for co-combustion with coal.
Munir S; Nimmo W; Gibbs BM
Bioresour Technol; 2010 Oct; 101(19):7614-23. PubMed ID: 20483598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reduction of fuel side costs due to biomass co-combustion.
Wils A; Calmano W; Dettmann P; Kaltschmitt M; Ecke H
J Hazard Mater; 2012 Mar; 207-208():147-51. PubMed ID: 21514049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Water use at pulverized coal power plants with postcombustion carbon capture and storage.
Zhai H; Rubin ES; Versteeg PL
Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Mar; 45(6):2479-85. PubMed ID: 21329343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Water impacts of CO2 emission performance standards for fossil fuel-fired power plants.
Talati S; Zhai H; Morgan MG
Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Oct; 48(20):11769-76. PubMed ID: 25229670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of blend ratio on the co-firing of a commercial torrefied biomass and coal via analysis of oxidation kinetics.
Goldfarb JL; Liu C
Bioresour Technol; 2013 Dec; 149():208-15. PubMed ID: 24113546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Separation and capture of CO2 from large stationary sources and sequestration in geological formations--coalbeds and deep saline aquifers.
White CM; Strazisar BR; Granite EJ; Hoffman JS; Pennline HW;
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2003 Jun; 53(6):645-715. PubMed ID: 12828330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the emission characteristics of trace metals from coal and fuel oil fired power plants and their fate during combustion.
Reddy MS; Basha S; Joshi HV; Jha B
J Hazard Mater; 2005 Aug; 123(1-3):242-9. PubMed ID: 15916850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Characteristics of carbonized sludge for co-combustion in pulverized coal power plants.
Park SW; Jang CH
Waste Manag; 2011 Mar; 31(3):523-9. PubMed ID: 21051215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of the US EPA's determination of the role for CO2 capture and storage in new fossil fuel-fired power plants.
Clark VR; Herzog HJ
Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Jul; 48(14):7723-9. PubMed ID: 24960207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Densified biomass can cost-effectively mitigate greenhouse gas emissions and address energy security in thermal applications.
Wilson TO; McNeal FM; Spatari S; G Abler D; Adler PR
Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Jan; 46(2):1270-7. PubMed ID: 22107056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mapping the economy of coal power plants retrofitted with post-combustion and biomass co-firing carbon capture in China.
Yuan J; Wang Y; Zhang W; Zhang J
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Apr; 30(16):47438-47454. PubMed ID: 36738409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Carbon dioxide emission factors for U.S. coal by origin and destination.
Quick JC
Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Apr; 44(7):2709-14. PubMed ID: 20232889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Co-combustion of agricultural residues with coal in a fluidized bed combustor.
Ghani WA; Alias AB; Savory RM; Cliffe KR
Waste Manag; 2009 Feb; 29(2):767-73. PubMed ID: 18614348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
