BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23286327)

  • 1. Statistical analysis of SHAPE-directed RNA secondary structure modeling.
    Ramachandran S; Ding F; Weeks KM; Dokholyan NV
    Biochemistry; 2013 Jan; 52(4):596-9. PubMed ID: 23286327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Principles for understanding the accuracy of SHAPE-directed RNA structure modeling.
    Leonard CW; Hajdin CE; Karabiber F; Mathews DH; Favorov OV; Dokholyan NV; Weeks KM
    Biochemistry; 2013 Jan; 52(4):588-95. PubMed ID: 23316814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Understanding the errors of SHAPE-directed RNA structure modeling.
    Kladwang W; VanLang CC; Cordero P; Das R
    Biochemistry; 2011 Sep; 50(37):8049-56. PubMed ID: 21842868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Unfolding of the tertiary structure of specific tRNA and ribosomal 5S RNA from plants as studied with hydroxyl radicals.
    Barciszewska MZ; Barciszewski J; Erdmann VA
    Int J Biol Macromol; 1992 Feb; 14(1):41-4. PubMed ID: 1317717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. RNA secondary structure prediction based on free energy and phylogenetic analysis.
    Juan V; Wilson C
    J Mol Biol; 1999 Jun; 289(4):935-47. PubMed ID: 10369773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Nucleotide sequence and secondary structure of 5S rRNA from Sphingobium chungbukense DJ77.
    Kwon HR; Kim YC
    J Microbiol; 2007 Feb; 45(1):79-82. PubMed ID: 17342061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improving RNA secondary structure prediction with structure mapping data.
    Sloma MF; Mathews DH
    Methods Enzymol; 2015; 553():91-114. PubMed ID: 25726462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of the suitability of free-energy minimization using nearest-neighbor energy parameters for RNA secondary structure prediction.
    Doshi KJ; Cannone JJ; Cobaugh CW; Gutell RR
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2004 Aug; 5():105. PubMed ID: 15296519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improving RNA Branching Predictions: Advances and Limitations.
    Poznanović S; Wood C; Cloer M; Heitsch C
    Genes (Basel); 2021 Mar; 12(4):. PubMed ID: 33805944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The 3D arrangement of the 23 S and 5 S rRNA in the Escherichia coli 50 S ribosomal subunit based on a cryo-electron microscopic reconstruction at 7.5 A resolution.
    Mueller F; Sommer I; Baranov P; Matadeen R; Stoldt M; Wöhnert J; Görlach M; van Heel M; Brimacombe R
    J Mol Biol; 2000 Apr; 298(1):35-59. PubMed ID: 10756104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The comparative RNA web (CRW) site: an online database of comparative sequence and structure information for ribosomal, intron, and other RNAs.
    Cannone JJ; Subramanian S; Schnare MN; Collett JR; D'Souza LM; Du Y; Feng B; Lin N; Madabusi LV; Müller KM; Pande N; Shang Z; Yu N; Gutell RR
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2002; 3():2. PubMed ID: 11869452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Modeling RNA Secondary Structure with Sequence Comparison and Experimental Mapping Data.
    Tan Z; Sharma G; Mathews DH
    Biophys J; 2017 Jul; 113(2):330-338. PubMed ID: 28735622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cofolga: a genetic algorithm for finding the common folding of two RNAs.
    Taneda A
    Comput Biol Chem; 2005 Apr; 29(2):111-9. PubMed ID: 15833439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Computational modeling analyses of RNA secondary structures and phylogenetic inference of evolutionary conserved 5S rRNA in the prokaryotes.
    Singh V; Somvanshi P
    J Mol Graph Model; 2009 Apr; 27(7):770-6. PubMed ID: 19217331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The 5S rRNA loop E: chemical probing and phylogenetic data versus crystal structure.
    Leontis NB; Westhof E
    RNA; 1998 Sep; 4(9):1134-53. PubMed ID: 9740131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mutations at position A960 of E. coli 23 S ribosomal RNA influence the structure of 5 S ribosomal RNA and the peptidyltransferase region of 23 S ribosomal RNA.
    Sergiev PV; Bogdanov AA; Dahlberg AE; Dontsova O
    J Mol Biol; 2000 Jun; 299(2):379-89. PubMed ID: 10860746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluating the quality of SHAPE data simulated by k-mers for RNA structure prediction.
    Montaseri S; Zare-Mirakabad F; Ganjtabesh M
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2017 Dec; 15(6):1750023. PubMed ID: 29113564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Moments of the Boltzmann distribution for RNA secondary structures.
    Miklós I; Meyer IM; Nagy B
    Bull Math Biol; 2005 Sep; 67(5):1031-47. PubMed ID: 15998494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. RNA secondary structure prediction with pseudoknots: Contribution of algorithm versus energy model.
    Jabbari H; Wark I; Montemagno C
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(4):e0194583. PubMed ID: 29621250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dynalign: an algorithm for finding the secondary structure common to two RNA sequences.
    Mathews DH; Turner DH
    J Mol Biol; 2002 Mar; 317(2):191-203. PubMed ID: 11902836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.