These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23286874)

  • 1. Approaches to efficiently estimate solvation and explicit water energetics in ligand binding: the use of WaterMap.
    Yang Y; Lightstone FC; Wong SE
    Expert Opin Drug Discov; 2013 Mar; 8(3):277-87. PubMed ID: 23286874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Addressing limitations with the MM-GB/SA scoring procedure using the WaterMap method and free energy perturbation calculations.
    Guimarães CR; Mathiowetz AM
    J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Apr; 50(4):547-59. PubMed ID: 20235592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Calculating Water Thermodynamics in the Binding Site of Proteins - Applications of WaterMap to Drug Discovery.
    Cappel D; Sherman W; Beuming T
    Curr Top Med Chem; 2017; 17(23):2586-2598. PubMed ID: 28413953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy comparison of several common implicit solvent models and their implementations in the context of protein-ligand binding.
    Katkova EV; Onufriev AV; Aguilar B; Sulimov VB
    J Mol Graph Model; 2017 Mar; 72():70-80. PubMed ID: 28064081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The application of WaterMap-guided structure-based virtual screening in novel drug discovery.
    Kaczor AA; Zięba A; Matosiuk D
    Expert Opin Drug Discov; 2024; 19(1):73-83. PubMed ID: 37807912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Postprocessing of docked protein-ligand complexes using implicit solvation models.
    Lindström A; Edvinsson L; Johansson A; Andersson CD; Andersson IE; Raubacher F; Linusson A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Feb; 51(2):267-82. PubMed ID: 21309544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Water network perturbation in ligand binding: adenosine A(2A) antagonists as a case study.
    Bortolato A; Tehan BG; Bodnarchuk MS; Essex JW; Mason JS
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Jul; 53(7):1700-13. PubMed ID: 23725291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accurate predictions of nonpolar solvation free energies require explicit consideration of binding-site hydration.
    Genheden S; Mikulskis P; Hu L; Kongsted J; Söderhjelm P; Ryde U
    J Am Chem Soc; 2011 Aug; 133(33):13081-92. PubMed ID: 21728337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Carbohydrate-binding proteins: Dissecting ligand structures through solvent environment occupancy.
    Gauto DF; Di Lella S; Guardia CM; Estrin DA; Martí MA
    J Phys Chem B; 2009 Jun; 113(25):8717-24. PubMed ID: 19485380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Contributions of water transfer energy to protein-ligand association and dissociation barriers: Watermap analysis of a series of p38α MAP kinase inhibitors.
    Pearlstein RA; Sherman W; Abel R
    Proteins; 2013 Sep; 81(9):1509-26. PubMed ID: 23468227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. MM-GB/SA rescoring of docking poses in structure-based lead optimization.
    Guimarães CR; Cardozo M
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 May; 48(5):958-70. PubMed ID: 18422307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Explicitly solvated ligand contribution to continuum solvation models for binding free energies: selectivity of theophylline binding to an RNA aptamer.
    Freedman H; Huynh LP; Le L; Cheatham TE; Tuszynski JA; Truong TN
    J Phys Chem B; 2010 Feb; 114(6):2227-37. PubMed ID: 20099932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Examining methods for calculations of binding free energies: LRA, LIE, PDLD-LRA, and PDLD/S-LRA calculations of ligands binding to an HIV protease.
    Sham YY; Chu ZT; Tao H; Warshel A
    Proteins; 2000 Jun; 39(4):393-407. PubMed ID: 10813821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fast and accurate predictions of binding free energies using MM-PBSA and MM-GBSA.
    Rastelli G; Del Rio A; Degliesposti G; Sgobba M
    J Comput Chem; 2010 Mar; 31(4):797-810. PubMed ID: 19569205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Polarizable water networks in ligand-metalloprotein recognition. Impact on the relative complexation energies of Zn-dependent phosphomannose isomerase with D-mannose 6-phosphate surrogates.
    Gresh N; de Courcy B; Piquemal JP; Foret J; Courtiol-Legourd S; Salmon L
    J Phys Chem B; 2011 Jun; 115(25):8304-16. PubMed ID: 21650197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use of the FACTS solvation model for protein-ligand docking calculations. Application to EADock.
    Zoete V; Grosdidier A; Cuendet M; Michielin O
    J Mol Recognit; 2010; 23(5):457-61. PubMed ID: 20101644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Structural parameterization of the binding enthalpy of small ligands.
    Luque I; Freire E
    Proteins; 2002 Nov; 49(2):181-90. PubMed ID: 12210999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Structural modeling of HCV NS3/4A serine protease drug-resistance mutations using end-point continuum solvation and side-chain flexibility calculations.
    Hotiana HA; Haider MK
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Feb; 53(2):435-51. PubMed ID: 23305404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Protein-ligand binding affinity predictions by implicit solvent simulations: a tool for lead optimization?
    Michel J; Verdonk ML; Essex JW
    J Med Chem; 2006 Dec; 49(25):7427-39. PubMed ID: 17149872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Scoring binding affinity of multiple ligands using implicit solvent and a single molecular dynamics trajectory: application to influenza neuraminidase.
    Bonnet P; Bryce RA
    J Mol Graph Model; 2005 Oct; 24(2):147-56. PubMed ID: 16098779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.