These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23287913)

  • 41. Ultrasonic characterization of ultrasound contrast agents.
    de Jong N; Emmer M; van Wamel A; Versluis M
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2009 Aug; 47(8):861-73. PubMed ID: 19468770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Visualization of multimodal polymer-shelled contrast agents using ultrasound contrast sequences: an experimental study in a tissue mimicking flow phantom.
    Larsson M; Larsson M; Oddo L; Margheritelli S; Paradossi G; Nowak J; Brodin LÅ; Caidahl K; Bjällmark A
    Cardiovasc Ultrasound; 2013 Aug; 11():33. PubMed ID: 23987142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Targeted binding of PEG-lipid modified polymer ultrasound contrast agents with tiered surface architecture.
    Duncanson WJ; Oum K; Eisenbrey JR; Cleveland RO; Wheatley MA; Wong JY
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2010 Jun; 106(3):501-6. PubMed ID: 20091738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Characterization of ultrasound-induced fracture of polymer-shelled ultrasonic contrast agents by correlation analysis.
    Pecorari C; Grishenkov D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2425-30. PubMed ID: 17902876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. A model for the dynamics of ultrasound contrast agents in vivo.
    Qin S; Ferrara KW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Sep; 128(3):1511-21. PubMed ID: 20815486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Magnetite nanoparticles can be coupled to microbubbles to support multimodal imaging.
    Brismar TB; Grishenkov D; Gustafsson B; Härmark J; Barrefelt A; Kothapalli SV; Margheritelli S; Oddo L; Caidahl K; Hebert H; Paradossi G
    Biomacromolecules; 2012 May; 13(5):1390-9. PubMed ID: 22458325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Inertial cavitation threshold of nested microbubbles.
    Wallace N; Dicker S; Lewin P; Wrenn SP
    Ultrasonics; 2015 Apr; 58():67-74. PubMed ID: 25620709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Nanobubbles are Non-Echogenic for Fundamental-Mode Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging.
    Myers JZ; Navarro-Becerra JA; Borden MA
    Bioconjug Chem; 2022 Jun; 33(6):1106-1113. PubMed ID: 35476906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Excitation of polymer-shelled contrast agents with high-frequency ultrasound.
    Ketterling JA; Mamou J; Allen JS; Aristizábal O; Williamson RG; Turnbull DH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jan; 121(1):EL48-53. PubMed ID: 17297826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Method for microbubble characterization using primary radiation force.
    Vos HJ; Guidi F; Boni E; Tortoli P
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2007 Jul; 54(7):1333-45. PubMed ID: 17718322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Synthesis of laboratory Ultrasound Contrast Agents.
    Park J; Park D; Shin U; Moon S; Kim C; Kim HS; Park H; Choi K; Jung B; Oh J; Seo J
    Molecules; 2013 Oct; 18(10):13078-95. PubMed ID: 24152677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Sensitivity improvement of subharmonic-based pressure measurement using phospholipid-coated monodisperse microbubbles.
    Wang P; Tan C; Ji X; Bai J; Yu ACH; Qin P
    Ultrason Sonochem; 2024 Mar; 104():106830. PubMed ID: 38432151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Effect of Bubble Concentration on the in Vitro and in Vivo Performance of Highly Stable Lipid Shell-Stabilized Micro- and Nanoscale Ultrasound Contrast Agents.
    Abenojar EC; Nittayacharn P; de Leon AC; Perera R; Wang Y; Bederman I; Exner AA
    Langmuir; 2019 Aug; 35(31):10192-10202. PubMed ID: 30913884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A comparison of the fragmentation thresholds and inertial cavitation doses of different ultrasound contrast agents.
    Chen WS; Matula TJ; Brayman AA; Crum LA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Jan; 113(1):643-51. PubMed ID: 12558300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. A method for differentiating targeted microbubbles in real time using subharmonic micro-ultrasound and interframe filtering.
    Needles A; Couture O; Foster FS
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2009 Sep; 35(9):1564-73. PubMed ID: 19632763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The effect of amplitude modulation on subharmonic imaging with chirp excitation.
    Harput S; Arif M; McLaughlan J; Cowell DM; Freear S
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2013 Dec; 60(12):2532-44. PubMed ID: 24297019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Effect of self-demodulation on the subharmonic response of contrast agent microbubbles.
    Daeichin V; Faez T; Renaud G; Bosch JG; van der Steen AF; de Jong N
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Jun; 57(12):3675-91. PubMed ID: 22614693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Subharmonic response of encapsulated microbubbles: conditions for existence and amplification.
    Kimmel E; Krasovitski B; Hoogi A; Razansky D; Adam D
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Nov; 33(11):1767-76. PubMed ID: 17720301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Impulse response method for characterization of echogenic liposomes.
    Raymond JL; Luan Y; van Rooij T; Kooiman K; Huang SL; McPherson DD; Versluis M; de Jong N; Holland CK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Apr; 137(4):1693-703. PubMed ID: 25920822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Polymeric nano/microcapsules of liquid perfluorocarbons for ultrasonic imaging: physical characterization.
    Pisani E; Tsapis N; Paris J; Nicolas V; Cattel L; Fattal E
    Langmuir; 2006 Apr; 22(9):4397-402. PubMed ID: 16618193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.