282 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23288354)
1. Emerging robotic platforms for minimally invasive surgery.
Vitiello V; Lee SL; Cundy TP; Yang GZ
IEEE Rev Biomed Eng; 2013; 6():111-26. PubMed ID: 23288354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. From medical images to minimally invasive intervention: Computer assistance for robotic surgery.
Lee SL; Lerotic M; Vitiello V; Giannarou S; Kwok KW; Visentini-Scarzanella M; Yang GZ
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2010 Jan; 34(1):33-45. PubMed ID: 19699056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Surgical robotics through a keyhole: from today's translational barriers to tomorrow's "disappearing" robots.
Marcus H; Nandi D; Darzi A; Yang GZ
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2013 Mar; 60(3):674-81. PubMed ID: 23372075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Design of an integrated master-slave robotic system for minimally invasive surgery.
Li J; Zhou N; Wang S; Gao Y; Liu D
Int J Med Robot; 2012 Mar; 8(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 21984343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Robotic arm enhancement to accommodate improved efficiency and decreased resource utilization in complex minimally invasive surgical procedures.
Geis WP; Kim HC; Brennan EJ; McAfee PC; Wang Y
Stud Health Technol Inform; 1996; 29():471-81. PubMed ID: 10172847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Lapabot: a compact telesurgical robot system for minimally invasive surgery: part I. System description.
Choi J; Park JW; Kim DJ; Shin J; Park CY; Lee JC; Jo YH
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2012 May; 21(3):188-94. PubMed ID: 21745135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Gaze-Contingent Motor Channelling, haptic constraints and associated cognitive demand for robotic MIS.
Mylonas GP; Kwok KW; James DR; Leff D; Orihuela-Espina F; Darzi A; Yang GZ
Med Image Anal; 2012 Apr; 16(3):612-31. PubMed ID: 20889367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study.
Sarlos D; Kots L; Stevanovic N; Schaer G
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 May; 150(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 20207063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Computer guidance system for single-incision bimanual robotic surgery.
Carbone M; Turini G; Petroni G; Niccolini M; Menciassi A; Ferrari M; Mosca F; Ferrari V
Comput Aided Surg; 2012; 17(4):161-71. PubMed ID: 22687053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of realistic force feedback in a robotic assisted minimally invasive surgery system.
Moradi Dalvand M; Shirinzadeh B; Nahavandi S; Smith J
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2014 Jun; 23(3):127-35. PubMed ID: 24328984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Robotic approaches to the posterior spine.
Ponnusamy K; Chewning S; Mohr C
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Sep; 34(19):2104-9. PubMed ID: 19730218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robotic surgery, telerobotic surgery, telepresence, and telementoring. Review of early clinical results.
Ballantyne GH
Surg Endosc; 2002 Oct; 16(10):1389-402. PubMed ID: 12140630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Development of a medical robot system for minimally invasive surgery.
Feng M; Fu Y; Pan B; Liu C
Int J Med Robot; 2012 Mar; 8(1):85-96. PubMed ID: 21990214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Image-guided surgery and emerging molecular imaging: advances to complement minimally invasive surgery.
Mitchell CR; Herrell SD
Urol Clin North Am; 2014 Nov; 41(4):567-80. PubMed ID: 25306168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. EndoCAS navigator platform: a common platform for computer and robotic assistance in minimally invasive surgery.
Megali G; Ferrari V; Freschi C; Morabito B; Cavallo F; Turini G; Troia E; Cappelli C; Pietrabissa A; Tonet O; Cuschieri A; Dario P; Mosca F
Int J Med Robot; 2008 Sep; 4(3):242-51. PubMed ID: 18698670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Miniature robotic guidance for spine surgery--introduction of a novel system and analysis of challenges encountered during the clinical development phase at two spine centres.
Barzilay Y; Liebergall M; Fridlander A; Knoller N
Int J Med Robot; 2006 Jun; 2(2):146-53. PubMed ID: 17520625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Wireless virtual instrument measurement of surgeons' physical and mental workloads for robotic versus manual minimally invasive surgery.
Smith WD; Berguer R; Rosser JC
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2003; 94():318-24. PubMed ID: 15455916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robotics in keyhole transcranial endoscope-assisted microsurgery: a critical review of existing systems and proposed specifications for new robotic platforms.
Marcus HJ; Seneci CA; Payne CJ; Nandi D; Darzi A; Yang GZ
Neurosurgery; 2014 Mar; 10 Suppl 1():84-95; discussion 95-6. PubMed ID: 23921708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Robotic mitral valve surgery.
Kypson AP; Nifong LW; Chitwood WR
Surg Clin North Am; 2003 Dec; 83(6):1387-403. PubMed ID: 14712874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Current and emerging robot-assisted endovascular catheterization technologies: a review.
Rafii-Tari H; Payne CJ; Yang GZ
Ann Biomed Eng; 2014 Apr; 42(4):697-715. PubMed ID: 24281653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
