BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

596 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23288613)

  • 1. ISOQOL recommends minimum standards for patient-reported outcome measures used in patient-centered outcomes and comparative effectiveness research.
    Reeve BB; Wyrwich KW; Wu AW; Velikova G; Terwee CB; Snyder CF; Schwartz C; Revicki DA; Moinpour CM; McLeod LD; Lyons JC; Lenderking WR; Hinds PS; Hays RD; Greenhalgh J; Gershon R; Feeny D; Fayers PM; Cella D; Brundage M; Ahmed S; Aaronson NK; Butt Z
    Qual Life Res; 2013 Oct; 22(8):1889-905. PubMed ID: 23288613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Patient-reported outcomes in randomized clinical trials: development of ISOQOL reporting standards.
    Brundage M; Blazeby J; Revicki D; Bass B; de Vet H; Duffy H; Efficace F; King M; Lam CL; Moher D; Scott J; Sloan J; Snyder C; Yount S; Calvert M
    Qual Life Res; 2013 Aug; 22(6):1161-75. PubMed ID: 22987144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The use of patient-reported outcomes (PRO) within comparative effectiveness research: implications for clinical practice and health care policy.
    Ahmed S; Berzon RA; Revicki DA; Lenderking WR; Moinpour CM; Basch E; Reeve BB; Wu AW;
    Med Care; 2012 Dec; 50(12):1060-70. PubMed ID: 22922434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Recommendations for incorporating patient-reported outcomes into clinical comparative effectiveness research in adult oncology.
    Basch E; Abernethy AP; Mullins CD; Reeve BB; Smith ML; Coons SJ; Sloan J; Wenzel K; Chauhan C; Eppard W; Frank ES; Lipscomb J; Raymond SA; Spencer M; Tunis S
    J Clin Oncol; 2012 Dec; 30(34):4249-55. PubMed ID: 23071244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The ISPOR Good Practices for Quality Improvement of Cost-Effectiveness Research Task Force Report.
    McGhan WF; Al M; Doshi JA; Kamae I; Marx SE; Rindress D
    Value Health; 2009; 12(8):1086-99. PubMed ID: 19744291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A model for incorporating patient and stakeholder voices in a learning health care network: Washington State's Comparative Effectiveness Research Translation Network.
    Devine EB; Alfonso-Cristancho R; Devlin A; Edwards TC; Farrokhi ET; Kessler L; Lavallee DC; Patrick DL; Sullivan SD; Tarczy-Hornoch P; Yanez ND; Flum DR;
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Aug; 66(8 Suppl):S122-9. PubMed ID: 23849146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs): putting the patient perspective in patient-centered outcomes research.
    Snyder CF; Jensen RE; Segal JB; Wu AW
    Med Care; 2013 Aug; 51(8 Suppl 3):S73-9. PubMed ID: 23774513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The case for a comparative, value-based alternative to the patient-centered outcomes research model for comparative effectiveness research.
    Marko NF; Weil RJ
    Neurosurg Focus; 2012 Jul; 33(1):E8. PubMed ID: 22746240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Increasing uptake of comparative effectiveness and patient-centered outcomes research among stakeholders: insights from conference discussion.
    Law E; Harrington R; Alexander GC; Saha S; Oehrlein E; Perfetto EM
    J Comp Eff Res; 2018 Feb; 7(2):181-191. PubMed ID: 29465252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. It is important to note that RWD will never replace the more traditional and more robust RCT data; however, the emerging trend is to incorporate data that are more generalizable. Introduction.
    Mullins CD; Sanchez RJ
    J Manag Care Pharm; 2011; 17(9 Suppl A):S03-4. PubMed ID: 22074667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An official American Thoracic Society research statement: comparative effectiveness research in pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine.
    Carson SS; Goss CH; Patel SR; Anzueto A; Au DH; Elborn S; Gerald JK; Gerald LB; Kahn JM; Malhotra A; Mularski RA; Riekert KA; Rubenfeld GD; Weaver TE; Krishnan JA;
    Am J Respir Crit Care Med; 2013 Nov; 188(10):1253-61. PubMed ID: 24160906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Measure once, cut twice--adding patient-reported outcome measures to the electronic health record for comparative effectiveness research.
    Wu AW; Kharrazi H; Boulware LE; Snyder CF
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Aug; 66(8 Suppl):S12-20. PubMed ID: 23849145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Investigator and Patient Global Assessment Measures for Psoriasis Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review on Measurement Properties from the International Dermatology Outcome Measures (IDEOM) Initiative.
    Perez-Chada LM; Salame NF; Ford AR; Duffin KC; Garg A; Gottlieb AB; Latella J; Merola JF; Armstrong AW
    Am J Clin Dermatol; 2020 Jun; 21(3):323-338. PubMed ID: 31950353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Methodological standards and patient-centeredness in comparative effectiveness research: the PCORI perspective.
    Methodology Committee of the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI)
    JAMA; 2012 Apr; 307(15):1636-40. PubMed ID: 22511692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Recommendations on evidence needed to support measurement equivalence between electronic and paper-based patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures: ISPOR ePRO Good Research Practices Task Force report.
    Coons SJ; Gwaltney CJ; Hays RD; Lundy JJ; Sloan JA; Revicki DA; Lenderking WR; Cella D; Basch E;
    Value Health; 2009 Jun; 12(4):419-29. PubMed ID: 19900250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative effectiveness and patient-centered outcomes research: enhancing uptake and use by patients, clinicians and payers.
    Schumock GT; Pickard AS
    J Comp Eff Res; 2018 Feb; 7(2):177-180. PubMed ID: 29464965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Translating comparative effectiveness research into Medicaid payment policy: views from medical and pharmacy directors.
    Weissman JS; Westrich K; Hargraves JL; Pearson SD; Dubois R; Emond S; Olufajo OA
    J Comp Eff Res; 2015 Mar; 4(2):79-88. PubMed ID: 25825839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stakeholder Engagement in a Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Measure Implementation: A Report from the SAFTINet Practice-based Research Network (PBRN).
    Kwan BM; Sills MR; Graham D; Hamer MK; Fairclough DL; Hammermeister KE; Kaiser A; de Jesus Diaz-Perez M; Schilling LM
    J Am Board Fam Med; 2016; 29(1):102-15. PubMed ID: 26769882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improving Comparative Effectiveness Research of Complex Health Interventions: Standards from the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI).
    Esmail LC; Barasky R; Mittman BS; Hickam DH
    J Gen Intern Med; 2020 Nov; 35(Suppl 2):875-881. PubMed ID: 33107006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Co-calibrating quality-of-life scores from three pulmonary disorders: implications for comparative-effectiveness research.
    Rouse M; Twiss J; McKenna SP
    J Med Econ; 2016 Jun; 19(6):596-603. PubMed ID: 26824603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 30.