These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23289599)

  • 1. Accuracy and reliability of methods to measure marginal adaptation of crowns and FDPs: a literature review.
    Nawafleh NA; Mack F; Evans J; Mackay J; Hatamleh MM
    J Prosthodont; 2013 Jul; 22(5):419-28. PubMed ID: 23289599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Marginal adaptation of Cerec 3 CAD/CAM composite crowns using two different finish line preparation designs.
    Akbar JH; Petrie CS; Walker MP; Williams K; Eick JD
    J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(3):155-63. PubMed ID: 16681497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of sensitivity and specificity of clinical evaluation of cast restoration marginal accuracy compared to stereomicroscopy.
    Jahangiri L; Wahlers C; Hittelman E; Matheson P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Feb; 93(2):138-42. PubMed ID: 15674223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Marginal adaptation of ceramic crowns: a systematic review.
    Contrepois M; Soenen A; Bartala M; Laviole O
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Dec; 110(6):447-454.e10. PubMed ID: 24120071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Nondestructive, in vitro quantification of crown margins.
    Mitchell CA; Pintado MR; Douglas WH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jun; 85(6):575-84. PubMed ID: 11404758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of software version and parameter settings on the marginal and internal adaptation of crowns fabricated with the CAD/CAM system.
    Shim JS; Lee JS; Lee JY; Choi YJ; Shin SW; Ryu JJ
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2015 Oct; 23(5):515-22. PubMed ID: 26537722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Marginal and internal adaptation of commercially pure titanium and titanium-aluminum-vanadium alloy cast restorations.
    Al Wazzan KA; Al-Nazzawi AA
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Jan; 8(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 17211501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of the marginal vertical discrepancies of zirconium and metal ceramic posterior fixed dental prostheses before and after cementation.
    Gonzalo E; Suárez MJ; Serrano B; Lozano JF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Dec; 102(6):378-84. PubMed ID: 19961996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of the veneering process on the marginal fit of zirconia fixed dental prostheses.
    Kohorst P; Brinkmann H; Dittmer MP; Borchers L; Stiesch M
    J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Apr; 37(4):283-91. PubMed ID: 20059649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Marginal fit of 14-unit zirconia fixed dental prosthesis retainers.
    Beuer F; Neumeier P; Naumann M
    J Oral Rehabil; 2009 Feb; 36(2):142-9. PubMed ID: 18976261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Marginal adaptation of fixed prosthodontics: a new in vitro 360-degree external examination procedure.
    Gassino G; Barone Monfrin S; Scanu M; Spina G; Preti G
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(2):218-23. PubMed ID: 15119875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The significance of marginal gap and overextension measurement in the evaluation of the fit of complete crowns.
    Boeckler AF; Stadler A; Setz JM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2005 Nov; 6(4):26-37. PubMed ID: 16299604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical evaluation of marginal fit of a new experimental all-ceramic system before and after cementation.
    Wolfart S; Wegner SM; Al-Halabi A; Kern M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(6):587-92. PubMed ID: 14714835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Marginal and internal adaptation of single crowns and fixed dental prostheses by using digital and conventional workflows: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Hasanzade M; Aminikhah M; Afrashtehfar KI; Alikhasi M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Sep; 126(3):360-368. PubMed ID: 32928518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Marginal accuracy of four-unit zirconia fixed dental prostheses fabricated using different computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing systems.
    Kohorst P; Brinkmann H; Li J; Borchers L; Stiesch M
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2009 Jun; 117(3):319-25. PubMed ID: 19583762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Marginal and internal discrepancies related to margin design of ceramic crowns fabricated by a CAD/CAM system.
    Souza RO; Özcan M; Pavanelli CA; Buso L; Lombardo GH; Michida SM; Mesquita AM; Bottino MA
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Feb; 21(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 22050205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of recasting palladium-silver alloy on the fit of crowns with different marginal configurations.
    Lopes MB; Consani S; Sinhoreti MA; Correr-Sobrinho L
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Nov; 94(5):430-4. PubMed ID: 16275302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of the marginal fit of Procera AllCeram crowns with two finish lines.
    Suárez MJ; González de Villaumbrosia P; Pradíes G; Lozano JF
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(3):229-32. PubMed ID: 12854783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Four-year clinical results of fixed dental prostheses with zirconia substructures (Cercon): end abutments vs. cantilever design.
    Wolfart S; Harder S; Eschbach S; Lehmann F; Kern M
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2009 Dec; 117(6):741-9. PubMed ID: 20121939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of the marginal adaptation of zirconium dioxide crowns in preparations with two different finish lines.
    Euán R; Figueras-Álvarez O; Cabratosa-Termes J; Brufau-de Barberà M; Gomes-Azevedo S
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Jun; 21(4):291-5. PubMed ID: 22372886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.