BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23289686)

  • 1. Beyond human subjects: risk, ethics, and clinical development of nanomedicines.
    Kimmelman J
    J Law Med Ethics; 2012; 40(4):841-7. PubMed ID: 23289686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Responsible conduct in nanomedicine research: environmental concerns beyond the common rule.
    Resnik DB
    J Law Med Ethics; 2012; 40(4):848-55. PubMed ID: 23289687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prudent precaution in clinical trials of nanomedicines.
    Marchant GE; Lindor RA
    J Law Med Ethics; 2012; 40(4):831-40. PubMed ID: 23289685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Building an ethical foundation for first-in-human nanotrials.
    Dresser R
    J Law Med Ethics; 2012; 40(4):802-8. PubMed ID: 23289682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Handling worker and third-party exposures to nanotherapeutics during clinical trials.
    Ramachandran G; Howard J; Maynard A; Philbert M
    J Law Med Ethics; 2012; 40(4):856-64. PubMed ID: 23289688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Concepts of risk in nanomedicine research.
    Hogle LF
    J Law Med Ethics; 2012; 40(4):809-22. PubMed ID: 23289683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A portrait of nanomedicine and its bioethical implications.
    Hall RM; Sun T; Ferrari M
    J Law Med Ethics; 2012; 40(4):763-79. PubMed ID: 23289679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. What is unique about nanomedicine? The significance of the mesoscale.
    Khushf G; Siegel RA
    J Law Med Ethics; 2012; 40(4):780-94. PubMed ID: 23289680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Nanomedicine first-in-human research: challenges for informed consent.
    King NM
    J Law Med Ethics; 2012; 40(4):823-30. PubMed ID: 23289684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Translating stem cell research: challenges at the research frontier.
    Magnus D
    J Law Med Ethics; 2010; 38(2):267-76. PubMed ID: 20579250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Introduction: the challenge of nanomedicine human subjects research: protecting participants, workers, bystanders, and the environment.
    Wolf SM
    J Law Med Ethics; 2012; 40(4):712-5. PubMed ID: 23289676
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ethical issues in clinical trials involving nanomedicine.
    Resnik DB; Tinkle SS
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2007 Jul; 28(4):433-41. PubMed ID: 17166777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ethics. Human health research ethics.
    Silbergeld E; Lerman S; Hushka L
    Science; 2004 Aug; 305(5686):949. PubMed ID: 15310879
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ethics in nanomedicine.
    Resnik DB; Tinkle SS
    Nanomedicine (Lond); 2007 Jun; 2(3):345-50. PubMed ID: 17716179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ethical issues in nanomedicine: Tempest in a teapot?
    Allon I; Ben-Yehudah A; Dekel R; Solbakk JH; Weltring KM; Siegal G
    Med Health Care Philos; 2017 Mar; 20(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 27522374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Time for new rules on human subjects research?
    Dresser R
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1998; 28(6):23-4. PubMed ID: 9868606
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Recommendations for nanomedicine human subjects research oversight: an evolutionary approach for an emerging field.
    Fatehi L; Wolf SM; McCullough J; Hall R; Lawrenz F; Kahn JP; Jones C; Campbell SA; Dresser RS; Erdman AG; Haynes CL; Hoerr RA; Hogle LF; Keane MA; Khushf G; King NM; Kokkoli E; Marchant G; Maynard AD; Philbert M; Ramachandran G; Siegel RA; Wickline S
    J Law Med Ethics; 2012; 40(4):716-50. PubMed ID: 23289677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ethicist faults human research subject protection.
    Marwick C
    JAMA; 1994 Apr; 271(16):1228-9. PubMed ID: 8151885
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing benefits in clinical research: why diversity in benefit assessment can be risky.
    Churchill LR; Nelson DK; Henderson GE; King NM; Davis AM; Leahey E; Wilfond BS
    IRB; 2003; 25(3):1-8. PubMed ID: 14569987
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Upstream ethics in nanomedicine: a call for research.
    Khushf G
    Nanomedicine (Lond); 2007 Aug; 2(4):511-21. PubMed ID: 17716134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.