These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23289701)

  • 1. Rethinking local Institutional Review Board (IRB) review at state health departments: implications for a consolidated, independent public health IRB.
    Perlman D
    J Law Med Ethics; 2012; 40(4):997-1007. PubMed ID: 23289701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Institutional review board (IRB) violated numerous regulations.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2001 Feb; 16(2):7-8. PubMed ID: 12530381
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. University admits research proceeded without review by an institutional review board (IRB).
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2003 Apr; 18(4):6-7. PubMed ID: 14603944
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analysis of the Nature of IRB Contingencies Required for Informed Consent Document Approval.
    Blackwood RA; Maio RF; Mrdjenovich AJ; VandenBosch TM; Gordon PS; Shipman EL; Hamilton TA
    Account Res; 2015; 22(4):237-45. PubMed ID: 25897768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Writing an application for a human subjects institutional review board.
    Colt HG; Mulnard RA
    Chest; 2006 Nov; 130(5):1605-7. PubMed ID: 17099043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Medical research oversight from the corporate governance perspective: comparing institutional review boards and corporate boards.
    Saver RS
    William Mary Law Rev; 2004 Nov; 46(2):619-730. PubMed ID: 17167924
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Institutional review boards and financial conflicts of interest.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2002 Feb; 17(2):1-2. PubMed ID: 12374174
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Revolution or reform in human subjects research oversight.
    Joffe S
    J Law Med Ethics; 2012; 40(4):922-9. PubMed ID: 23289695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Institutional review board approval: why it matters.
    Parvizi J; Tarity TD; Conner K; Smith JB
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2007 Feb; 89(2):418-26. PubMed ID: 17272462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. EPA's 2006 human-subjects rule for pesticide experiments.
    Shrader-Frechette K
    Account Res; 2007; 14(4):211-54. PubMed ID: 18246943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Changes in the institutional review board submission process for multicenter research over 6 years.
    Pogorzelska M; Stone PW; Cohn EG; Larson E
    Nurs Outlook; 2010; 58(4):181-7. PubMed ID: 20637931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cancer trials and the Institutional Review Board (IRB).
    Kurtzman S; Lazzarini Z
    Cancer Treat Res; 2007; 132():11-30. PubMed ID: 17305015
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Should society allow research ethics boards to be run as for-profit enterprises?
    Emanuel EJ; Lemmens T; Elliot C
    PLoS Med; 2006 Jul; 3(7):e309. PubMed ID: 16848618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Public health practice vs research: implications for preparedness and disaster research review by State Health Department IRBs.
    Perlman D
    Disaster Med Public Health Prep; 2008 Oct; 2(3):185-91. PubMed ID: 18845930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Research administrator should not serve on institutional review board.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2002 Apr; 17(4):6-7. PubMed ID: 12374181
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The flip of the coin: exempt, expedited, or full IRB review?
    Bliss-Holtz J
    AACN Adv Crit Care; 2007; 18(2):213-7. PubMed ID: 17473550
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Office of Human Research Protections.
    Chamberlain B
    Clin Nurse Spec; 2008; 22(6):268. PubMed ID: 18955842
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Protecting vulnerable research subjects: practical realities of institutional review board review and approval.
    Wichman A
    J Health Care Law Policy; 1998; 1(1):88-104. PubMed ID: 15573431
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Extend the reach of institutional review boards first, then strengthen their depth.
    Spike J
    Am J Bioeth; 2008 Nov; 8(11):11-2. PubMed ID: 19061097
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Research involving children: regulations, review boards and reform.
    Gandhi R
    J Health Care Law Policy; 2005; 8(2):264-330. PubMed ID: 16471026
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.