266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23290426)
1. Surgical aspects of removal of Essure microinsert.
Albright CM; Frishman GN; Bhagavath B
Contraception; 2013 Sep; 88(3):334-6. PubMed ID: 23290426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Two Surgical Techniques for Essure Device Ablation: The Hysteroscopic Way and the Laparoscopic Way by Salpingectomy with Tubal Interstitial Resection.
Tissot M; Petry S; Lecointre L; Faller E; Baldauf JJ; Akladios C; Boisrame T
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(4):603. PubMed ID: 30064007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Confirmation of Essure microinsert tubal coil placement with conventional and volume-contrast imaging three-dimensional ultrasound.
Thiel JA; Suchet IB; Lortie K
Fertil Steril; 2005 Aug; 84(2):504-8. PubMed ID: 16084897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Laparoscopic management of hysteroscopic essure sterilization complications: report of 3 cases.
Hur HC; Mansuria SM; Chen BA; Lee TT
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(3):362-5. PubMed ID: 18439513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intraoperative Factors that Predict the Successful Placement of Essure Microinserts.
Arthuis CJ; Simon EG; Hébert T; Marret H
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(5):803-810. PubMed ID: 28390945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Case report of failed tubal occlusion using Essure pbc (permanent birth control) hysteroscopic sterilisation procedure.
Karthigasu KA; Garry R; Hart R
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2006 Aug; 46(4):365-7. PubMed ID: 16866803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Laparoscopic salpingectomy and removal of Essure hysteroscopic sterilisation device: a case series.
Johal T; Kuruba N; Sule M; Mukhopadhyay S; Raje G
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2018 Jun; 23(3):227-230. PubMed ID: 29842838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Laparoscopic Cornuectomy as a Technique for Removal of Essure Microinserts.
Thiel L; Rattray D; Thiel J
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 24(1):10. PubMed ID: 27422719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Discordant relationship between Essure microinsert position and tubal occlusion.
Hou MY
BMJ Case Rep; 2016 Jul; 2016():. PubMed ID: 27466315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A kink is not always a perforation: assessing Essure hysteroscopic sterilization placement.
Borley J; Shabajee N; Tan TL
Fertil Steril; 2011 Jun; 95(7):2429.e15-7. PubMed ID: 21367412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Technique for the Laparoscopic Removal of Essure Microinserts.
Mahmoud MS
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(4):472. PubMed ID: 26776673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bilateral Cornual Resection for Uterine-sparing Removal of Tubal Sterilization Devices.
Carey-Love A; Orlando MS; Falcone T; King CR
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2023 Jul; 30(7):535. PubMed ID: 37116745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Perioperative findings and complications in Essure® removal surgery.
Horsten DL; van Gastel DM; Maassen LW; Koks CAM; Veersema S; Bongers MY
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2021 Aug; 263():1-6. PubMed ID: 34129961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. ICSI pregnancy outcomes following hysteroscopic placement of Essure devices for hydrosalpinx in laparoscopic contraindicated patients.
Ozgur K; Bulut H; Berkkanoglu M; Coetzee K; Kaya G
Reprod Biomed Online; 2014 Jul; 29(1):113-8. PubMed ID: 24813749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Laparoscopic Essure® Device Removal by En Bloc Salpingectomy-Cornuectomy with Intraoperative X-Ray Checking: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Miquel L; Crochet P; Francini S; Compan C; Boubli L; Agostini A
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(3):697-703. PubMed ID: 31212073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Unilateral placement of the Adiana device after failed bilateral placement of the Essure device for hysteroscopic sterilization.
Gimpelson RJ; Wagner CA
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(5):660-1. PubMed ID: 20728829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The safety and effectiveness of a new hysteroscopic method for permanent birth control: results of the first Essure pbc clinical study.
Kerin JF; Carignan CS; Cher D
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2001 Nov; 41(4):364-70. PubMed ID: 11787907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Contrast infusion sonography to assess microinsert placement and tubal occlusion after Essure.
Connor VF
Fertil Steril; 2006 Jun; 85(6):1791-3. PubMed ID: 16650420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of Hysterosalpingo-Foam Sonography for Assessment of the Efficacy of Essure Hysteroscopic Sterilization.
Rosič M; Žegura B; Vadnjal Đonlagić S
J Ultrasound Med; 2018 Aug; 37(8):1929-1935. PubMed ID: 29344973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Removal of Essure Sterilization Devices: A Retrospective Cohort Study in the Netherlands.
Maassen LW; van Gastel DM; Haveman I; Bongers MY; Veersema S
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(6):1056-1062. PubMed ID: 30340052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
