These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

70 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23290587)

  • 1. Analysis of implanted silicon dopant profiles.
    Prosa TJ; Olson D; Geiser B; Larson DJ; Henry K; Steel E
    Ultramicroscopy; 2013 Sep; 132():179-85. PubMed ID: 23290587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Investigations of field-evaporated end forms in voltage- and laser-pulsed atom probe tomography.
    Shariq A; Mutas S; Wedderhoff K; Klein C; Hortenbach H; Teichert S; Kücher P; Gerstl SS
    Ultramicroscopy; 2009 Apr; 109(5):472-9. PubMed ID: 19062187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Atom probe trajectory mapping using experimental tip shape measurements.
    Haley D; Petersen T; Ringer SP; Smith GD
    J Microsc; 2011 Nov; 244(2):170-80. PubMed ID: 22004277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Imaging of arsenic Cottrell atmospheres around silicon defects by three-dimensional atom probe tomography.
    Thompson K; Flaitz PL; Ronsheim P; Larson DJ; Kelly TF
    Science; 2007 Sep; 317(5843):1370-4. PubMed ID: 17823348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Characterization of dilute species within CVD-grown silicon nanowires doped using trimethylboron: protected lift-out specimen preparation for atom probe tomography.
    Prosa TJ; Alvis R; Tsakalakos L; Smentkowski VS
    J Microsc; 2010 Aug; 239(2):92-8. PubMed ID: 20629915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Three-dimensional doping and diffusion in nano scaled devices as studied by atom probe tomography.
    Kambham AK; Kumar A; Florakis A; Vandervorst W
    Nanotechnology; 2013 Jul; 24(27):275705. PubMed ID: 23764804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of analysis direction on the measurement of interfacial mixing in thin metal layers with atom probe tomography.
    Larson DJ; Prosa TJ; Geiser BP; Egelhoff WF
    Ultramicroscopy; 2011 May; 111(6):506-11. PubMed ID: 21215522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Depth-dependent imaging of individual dopant atoms in silicon.
    Voyles PM; Muller DA; Kirkland EJ
    Microsc Microanal; 2004 Apr; 10(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 15306055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Three-dimensional atom mapping of boron in implanted silicon.
    Cojocaru-Mirédin O; Cadel E; Deconihout B; Mangelinck D; Blavette D
    Ultramicroscopy; 2009 Apr; 109(5):649-53. PubMed ID: 19026490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Electrostatic simulations of a local electrode atom probe: the dependence of tomographic reconstruction parameters on specimen and microscope geometry.
    Loi ST; Gault B; Ringer SP; Larson DJ; Geiser BP
    Ultramicroscopy; 2013 Sep; 132():107-13. PubMed ID: 23294557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Introducing a Crystallography-Mediated Reconstruction (CMR) Approach to Atom Probe Tomography.
    Day AC; Ceguerra AV; Ringer SP
    Microsc Microanal; 2019 Apr; 25(2):288-300. PubMed ID: 30712521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Characteristics of cross-sectional atom probe analysis on semiconductor structures.
    Koelling S; Innocenti N; Hellings G; Gilbert M; Kambham AK; De Meyer K; Vandervorst W
    Ultramicroscopy; 2011 May; 111(6):540-5. PubMed ID: 21292399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The art of electrochemical etching for preparing tungsten probes with controllable tip profile and characteristic parameters.
    Ju BF; Chen YL; Ge Y
    Rev Sci Instrum; 2011 Jan; 82(1):013707. PubMed ID: 21280837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Advances in pulsed-laser atom probe: instrument and specimen design for optimum performance.
    Bunton JH; Olson JD; Lenz DR; Kelly TF
    Microsc Microanal; 2007 Dec; 13(6):418-27. PubMed ID: 18001508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pragmatic reconstruction methods in atom probe tomography.
    Vurpillot F; Gruber M; Da Costa G; Martin I; Renaud L; Bostel A
    Ultramicroscopy; 2011 Jul; 111(8):1286-94. PubMed ID: 21864769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Understanding the detection of carbon in austenitic high-Mn steel using atom probe tomography.
    Marceau RK; Choi P; Raabe D
    Ultramicroscopy; 2013 Sep; 132():239-47. PubMed ID: 23477853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. 3D site specific sample preparation and analysis of 3D devices (FinFETs) by atom probe tomography.
    Kambham AK; Kumar A; Gilbert M; Vandervorst W
    Ultramicroscopy; 2013 Sep; 132():65-9. PubMed ID: 23498555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A model to predict image formation in Atom probe Tomography.
    Vurpillot F; Gaillard A; Da Costa G; Deconihout B
    Ultramicroscopy; 2013 Sep; 132():152-7. PubMed ID: 23398963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clustering and pair correlation function in atom probe tomography.
    Philippe T; Duguay S; Blavette D
    Ultramicroscopy; 2010 Jun; 110(7):862-5. PubMed ID: 20378248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Limits in detecting an individual dopant atom embedded in a crystal.
    Mittal A; Mkhoyan KA
    Ultramicroscopy; 2011 Jul; 111(8):1101-10. PubMed ID: 21741341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.