367 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23290671)
1. Clinical use of CT colonography for colorectal cancer screening in military training facilities and potential impact on HEDIS measures.
Cash BD; Stamps K; McFarland EG; Spiegel AR; Wade SW
J Am Coll Radiol; 2013 Jan; 10(1):30-6. PubMed ID: 23290671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost-effectiveness analysis of colorectal cancer screening methods in Iran.
Allameh Z; Davari M; Emami MH
Arch Iran Med; 2011 Mar; 14(2):110-4. PubMed ID: 21361717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening colonoscopy vs. sigmoidoscopy and alternative strategies.
Sharaf RN; Ladabaum U
Am J Gastroenterol; 2013 Jan; 108(1):120-32. PubMed ID: 23247579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost-effectiveness modeling of colorectal cancer: computed tomography colonography vs colonoscopy or fecal occult blood tests.
Lucidarme O; Cadi M; Berger G; Taieb J; Poynard T; Grenier P; Beresniak A
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jul; 81(7):1413-9. PubMed ID: 21444171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Colon cancer prevention in Italy: cost-effectiveness analysis with CT colonography and endoscopy.
Hassan C; Zullo A; Laghi A; Reitano I; Taggi F; Cerro P; Iafrate F; Giustini M; Winn S; Morini S
Dig Liver Dis; 2007 Mar; 39(3):242-50. PubMed ID: 17112797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Health benefits and cost-effectiveness of a hybrid screening strategy for colorectal cancer.
Dinh T; Ladabaum U; Alperin P; Caldwell C; Smith R; Levin TR
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2013 Sep; 11(9):1158-66. PubMed ID: 23542330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The impact of CT colonography for colorectal cancer screening on the UK NHS: costs, healthcare resources and health outcomes.
Sweet A; Lee D; Gairy K; Phiri D; Reason T; Lock K
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2011; 9(1):51-64. PubMed ID: 21174482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost-effectiveness analysis on screening for colorectal neoplasm and management of colorectal cancer in Asia.
Tsoi KK; Ng SS; Leung MC; Sung JJ
Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2008 Aug; 28(3):353-63. PubMed ID: 18638075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The evolving role of CT colonography.
Deshpande N; Weinberg DS
Cancer Invest; 2007 Mar; 25(2):127-33. PubMed ID: 17453825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost effectiveness of CT colonography for UK NHS colorectal cancer screening of asymptomatic adults aged 60-69 years.
Lee D; Muston D; Sweet A; Cunningham C; Slater A; Lock K
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2010; 8(3):141-54. PubMed ID: 20369905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Colorectal cancer test use--Maryland, 2002-2006.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 2007 Sep; 56(36):932-6. PubMed ID: 17851446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Population screening for colorectal cancer by flexible sigmoidoscopy or CT colonography: study protocol for a multicenter randomized trial.
Regge D; Iussich G; Senore C; Correale L; Hassan C; Bert A; Montemezzi S; Segnan N
Trials; 2014 Mar; 15():97. PubMed ID: 24678896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost Effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer Screening Strategies.
Patel SS; Kilgore ML
Cancer Control; 2015 Apr; 22(2):248-58. PubMed ID: 26068773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost-effectiveness of computed tomographic colonography screening for colorectal cancer in the medicare population.
Knudsen AB; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Rutter CM; Savarino JE; van Ballegooijen M; Kuntz KM; Zauber AG
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2010 Aug; 102(16):1238-52. PubMed ID: 20664028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Small and diminutive polyps detected at screening CT colonography: a decision analysis for referral to colonoscopy.
Pickhardt PJ; Hassan C; Laghi A; Zullo A; Kim DH; Iafrate F; Morini S
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Jan; 190(1):136-44. PubMed ID: 18094303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Value-of-information analysis to guide future research in colorectal cancer screening.
Hassan C; Hunink MG; Laghi A; Pickhardt PJ; Zullo A; Kim DH; Iafrate F; Di Giulio E
Radiology; 2009 Dec; 253(3):745-52. PubMed ID: 19789242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An international review of the main cost-effectiveness drivers of virtual colonography versus conventional colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening: is the tide changing due to adherence?
Kriza C; Emmert M; Wahlster P; Niederländer C; Kolominsky-Rabas P
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Nov; 82(11):e629-36. PubMed ID: 23938237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Screening based on risk for colorectal cancer is the most cost-effective approach.
Dan YY; Chuah BY; Koh DC; Yeoh KG
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2012 Mar; 10(3):266-71.e1-6. PubMed ID: 22100624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sociodemographic Factors and Screening CT Colonography Use Among Medicare Beneficiaries.
Christensen EW; Sanelli PC; Rula EY; Chang KJ; Moreno CC; Bruining DH; Yee J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2024 Jan; 222(1):e2329703. PubMed ID: 37466190
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Medicare cost of colorectal cancer screening: CT colonography vs. optical colonoscopy.
Pyenson B; Pickhardt PJ; Sawhney TG; Berrios M
Abdom Imaging; 2015 Oct; 40(8):2966-76. PubMed ID: 26350285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
