These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
692 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23291142)
1. [Comparative analysis of early diagnostic tools for breast cancer]. Shen SJ; Sun Q; Xu YL; Zhou YD; Guan JH; Mao F; Lin Y; Wang XJ; Han SM Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2012 Nov; 34(11):877-80. PubMed ID: 23291142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer. Berg WA; Gutierrez L; NessAiver MS; Carter WB; Bhargavan M; Lewis RS; Ioffe OB Radiology; 2004 Dec; 233(3):830-49. PubMed ID: 15486214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ultrasound is a useful adjunct to mammography in the assessment of breast tumours in all patients. McCavert M; O'Donnell ME; Aroori S; Badger SA; Sharif MA; Crothers JG; Spence RA Int J Clin Pract; 2009 Nov; 63(11):1589-94. PubMed ID: 19686337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Electrical impedance scanning in the differentiation of suspicious breast lesions: comparison with mammography, ultrasound and histopathology]. Fuchsjäger MH; Helbich TH; Ringl H; Funovics MA; Rudas M; Riedl C; Pfarl G Rofo; 2002 Dec; 174(12):1522-9. PubMed ID: 12471524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Outcome of men presenting with clinical breast problems: the role of mammography and ultrasound. Patterson SK; Helvie MA; Aziz K; Nees AV Breast J; 2006; 12(5):418-23. PubMed ID: 16958958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of mammography and ultrasound in women with breast disease: a receiver operating characteristic analysis. Ying X; Lin Y; Xia X; Hu B; Zhu Z; He P Breast J; 2012; 18(2):130-8. PubMed ID: 22356352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Diagnostic value of full-field digital mammography for breast carcinoma]. Ding JH; Peng WJ; Jiang ZX; Xu LH; Hu DT; Zheng XJ Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2009 Nov; 31(11):854-7. PubMed ID: 20137352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of clinical examination, digital mammogram, ultrasound, and MRI in determining postneoadjuvant pathologic tumor response in operable breast cancer patients. Croshaw R; Shapiro-Wright H; Svensson E; Erb K; Julian T Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Oct; 18(11):3160-3. PubMed ID: 21947594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The accuracy of "one-stop" diagnosis for 1,110 patients presenting to a symptomatic breast clinic. Eltahir A; Jibril JA; Squair J; Heys SD; Ah-See AK; Needham G; Gilbert FJ; Deans HE; McKean ME; Smart LM; Eremin O J R Coll Surg Edinb; 1999 Aug; 44(4):226-30. PubMed ID: 10453144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Technetium-99m sestamibi scintimammography: the influence of histopathological characteristics, lesion size and the presence of carcinoma in situ in the detection of breast carcinoma. Howarth D; Sillar R; Clark D; Lan L Eur J Nucl Med; 1999 Nov; 26(11):1475-81. PubMed ID: 10552090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Longitudinal measurement of clinical mammographic breast density to improve estimation of breast cancer risk. Kerlikowske K; Ichikawa L; Miglioretti DL; Buist DS; Vacek PM; Smith-Bindman R; Yankaskas B; Carney PA; Ballard-Barbash R; J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Mar; 99(5):386-95. PubMed ID: 17341730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Retrospective and comparative analysis of (99m)Tc-Sestamibi breast specific gamma imaging versus mammography, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of breast cancer in Chinese women. Yu X; Hu G; Zhang Z; Qiu F; Shao X; Wang X; Zhan H; Chen Y; Deng Y; Huang J BMC Cancer; 2016 Jul; 16():450. PubMed ID: 27401536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of Liu H; Zhan H; Sun D BMC Cancer; 2020 May; 20(1):463. PubMed ID: 32448217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. CE-Magnetic Resonance Mammography for the evaluation of the contralateral breast in patients with diagnosed breast cancer. Pediconi F; Venditti F; Padula S; Roselli A; Moriconi E; Giacomelli L; Catalano C; Passariello R Radiol Med; 2005; 110(1-2):61-8. PubMed ID: 16163140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Contrast-enhanced MR mammography for evaluation of the contralateral breast in patients with diagnosed unilateral breast cancer or high-risk lesions. Pediconi F; Catalano C; Roselli A; Padula S; Altomari F; Moriconi E; Pronio AM; Kirchin MA; Passariello R Radiology; 2007 Jun; 243(3):670-80. PubMed ID: 17446524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic accuracy of Tc-99m-MIBI for breast carcinoma in correlation with mammography and sonography. Habib S; Maseeh-uz-Zaman ; Hameed A; Niaz K; Hashmi H; Kamal S J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2009 Oct; 19(10):622-6. PubMed ID: 19811712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Cross-Sectional Observational Study to Compare the Role of Ultrasound with Mammography in Women Identified at High Risk for Breast Cancer in a Population in China. An P; Zhong S; Zhang R; Hou X; Xi R; Wang Y Med Sci Monit; 2020 Jun; 26():e919777. PubMed ID: 32576809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. False-negative rate of combined mammography and ultrasound for women with palpable breast masses. Chan CH; Coopey SB; Freer PE; Hughes KS Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2015 Oct; 153(3):699-702. PubMed ID: 26341750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]