These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23292528)

  • 1. The significance of streamlined postprocessing approaches for clinical FMRI.
    Pillai JJ
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2013; 34(6):1194-6. PubMed ID: 23292528
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Visual cerebral microbleed detection on 7T MR imaging: reliability and effects of image processing.
    de Bresser J; Brundel M; Conijn MM; van Dillen JJ; Geerlings MI; Viergever MA; Luijten PR; Biessels GJ
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2013; 34(6):E61-4. PubMed ID: 22345502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Discriminating brain activity from task-related artifacts in functional MRI: fractal scaling analysis simulation and application.
    Lee JM; Hu J; Gao J; Crosson B; Peck KK; Wierenga CE; McGregor K; Zhao Q; White KD
    Neuroimage; 2008 Mar; 40(1):197-212. PubMed ID: 18178485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation and optimization of fMRI single-subject processing pipelines with NPAIRS and second-level CVA.
    Zhang J; Anderson JR; Liang L; Pulapura SK; Gatewood L; Rottenberg DA; Strother SC
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Feb; 27(2):264-78. PubMed ID: 18849131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Automatic method for tracing regions of interest in rat brain magnetic resonance imaging studies.
    Nie B; Hui J; Wang L; Chai P; Gao J; Liu S; Zhang Z; Shan B; Zhao S
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Oct; 32(4):830-5. PubMed ID: 20882613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Exploring predictive and reproducible modeling with the single-subject FIAC dataset.
    Chen X; Pereira F; Lee W; Strother S; Mitchell T
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2006 May; 27(5):452-61. PubMed ID: 16565951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cross-validation failure: Small sample sizes lead to large error bars.
    Varoquaux G
    Neuroimage; 2018 Oct; 180(Pt A):68-77. PubMed ID: 28655633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perspective: Brain scans need a rethink.
    Deen B; Pelphrey K
    Nature; 2012 Nov; 491(7422):S20. PubMed ID: 23136657
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reproducibility of importance extraction methods in neural network based fMRI classification.
    Gotsopoulos A; Saarimäki H; Glerean E; Jääskeläinen IP; Sams M; Nummenmaa L; Lampinen J
    Neuroimage; 2018 Nov; 181():44-54. PubMed ID: 29964190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diagnosis of single-subject and group fMRI data with SPMd.
    Zhang H; Luo WL; Nichols TE
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2006 May; 27(5):442-51. PubMed ID: 16615119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Non-normalized individual analysis of statistical parametric mapping for clinical fMRI.
    Nagata T; Tsuyuguchi N; Uda T; Ohata K
    Neurol India; 2011; 59(3):339-43. PubMed ID: 21743159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Simple fMRI postprocessing suffices for normal clinical practice.
    González-Ortiz S; Oleaga L; Pujol T; Medrano S; Rumiá J; Caral L; Boget T; Capellades J; Bargalló N
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2013; 34(6):1188-93. PubMed ID: 23306014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of the increase in variability when combining volumetric data from different scanners.
    Reig S; Sánchez-González J; Arango C; Castro J; González-Pinto A; Ortuño F; Crespo-Facorro B; Bargalló N; Desco M
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2009 Feb; 30(2):355-68. PubMed ID: 18064586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A method for generating reproducible evidence in fMRI studies.
    Liou M; Su HR; Lee JD; Aston JA; Tsai AC; Cheng PE
    Neuroimage; 2006 Jan; 29(2):383-95. PubMed ID: 16226893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Isolating the sources of pipeline-variability in group-level task-fMRI results.
    Bowring A; Nichols TE; Maumet C
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2022 Feb; 43(3):1112-1128. PubMed ID: 34773436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Inference for magnitudes and delays of responses in the FIAC data using BRAINSTAT/FMRISTAT.
    Taylor JE; Worsley KJ
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2006 May; 27(5):434-41. PubMed ID: 16568426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Investigation of optimal display size for viewing T1-weighted MR images of the brain using a digital contrast-detail phantom.
    Fujita H; Kuwahata N; Hattori H; Kinoshita H; Fukuda H
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jan; 17(1):353-359. PubMed ID: 26894360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analyzing fMRI experiments with structural adaptive smoothing procedures.
    Tabelow K; Polzehl J; Voss HU; Spokoiny V
    Neuroimage; 2006 Oct; 33(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 16891126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Detectability and reproducibility of the olfactory fMRI signal under the influence of magnetic susceptibility artifacts in the primary olfactory cortex.
    Lu J; Wang X; Qing Z; Li Z; Zhang W; Liu Y; Yuan L; Cheng L; Li M; Zhu B; Zhang X; Yang QX; Zhang B
    Neuroimage; 2018 Sep; 178():613-621. PubMed ID: 29885483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Presurgical functional magnetic resonance imaging].
    Stippich C
    Radiologe; 2010 Feb; 50(2):110-22. PubMed ID: 20157803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.