These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23293615)

  • 1. Regulating emotion in the context of interpersonal decisions: the role of anticipated pride and regret.
    van der Schalk J; Bruder M; Manstead A
    Front Psychol; 2012; 3():513. PubMed ID: 23293615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The social power of regret: the effect of social appraisal and anticipated emotions on fair and unfair allocations in resource dilemmas.
    van der Schalk J; Kuppens T; Bruder M; Manstead AS
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2015 Feb; 144(1):151-7. PubMed ID: 25384163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Abnormal emotion processing, but intact fairness and intentionality considerations during social decision-making in schizophrenia.
    de la Asuncion J; Docx L; Sabbe B; Morrens M; de Bruijn ER
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1058. PubMed ID: 26257699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Altered economic decision-making in abstinent heroin addicts: Evidence from the ultimatum game.
    Hou Y; Zhao L; Yao Q; Ding L
    Neurosci Lett; 2016 Aug; 627():148-54. PubMed ID: 27264486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Do different fairness contexts and facial emotions motivate 'irrational' social decision-making in major depression? An exploratory patient study.
    Radke S; Schäfer IC; Müller BW; de Bruijn ER
    Psychiatry Res; 2013 Dec; 210(2):438-43. PubMed ID: 23910237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Behavioural consequences of regret and disappointment in social bargaining games.
    Martinez LM; Zeelenberg M; Rijsman JB
    Cogn Emot; 2011 Feb; 25(2):351-9. PubMed ID: 21432677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Does interoceptive awareness affect the ability to regulate unfair treatment by others?
    van 't Wout M; Faught S; Menino D
    Front Psychol; 2013; 4():880. PubMed ID: 24348438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Influence of Emotion on Fairness-Related Decision Making: A Critical Review of Theories and Evidence.
    Zheng Y; Yang Z; Jin C; Qi Y; Liu X
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():1592. PubMed ID: 28974937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Outcomes versus intentions in fairness-related decision making: School-aged children's decisions are just like those of adults.
    Jaroslawska AJ; McCormack T; Burns P; Caruso EM
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2020 Jan; 189():104704. PubMed ID: 31634734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Salivary alpha-amylase levels and rejection of unfair offers in the ultimatum game.
    Takagishi H; Fujii T; Kameshima S; Koizumi M; Takahashi T
    Neuro Endocrinol Lett; 2009; 30(5):643-6. PubMed ID: 20035253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Saliency modulates affective evaluations but not behavioral responses in the ultimatum game.
    Liu C; Chai J; Yu R
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Feb; 183():99-107. PubMed ID: 29331200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Incidental sadness biases social economic decisions in the Ultimatum Game.
    Harlé KM; Sanfey AG
    Emotion; 2007 Nov; 7(4):876-81. PubMed ID: 18039057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influences of State and Trait Affect on Behavior, Feedback-Related Negativity, and P3b in the Ultimatum Game.
    Riepl K; Mussel P; Osinsky R; Hewig J
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(1):e0146358. PubMed ID: 26742103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Circadian rhythms and decision-making: a review and new evidence from electroencephalography.
    Correa Á; Alguacil S; Ciria LF; Jiménez A; Ruz M
    Chronobiol Int; 2020 Apr; 37(4):520-541. PubMed ID: 32000532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Social comparisons differentially affect fair and unfair processing in ultimatum bargaining.
    Li Q; Dai W; Zheng Y; Wang C; Yang Z; Ren Q; Hu K; Liu X
    Neuropsychologia; 2022 Sep; 174():108318. PubMed ID: 35830915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Social value orientation modulates fairness processing during social decision-making: evidence from behavior and brain potentials.
    Hu X; Mai X
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2021 Jul; 16(7):670-682. PubMed ID: 33769539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Rejection of unfair offers can be driven by negative emotions, evidence from modified ultimatum games with anonymity.
    Ma N; Li N; He XS; Sun DL; Zhang X; Zhang DR
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(6):e39619. PubMed ID: 22761845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Disentangling self- and fairness-related neural mechanisms involved in the ultimatum game: an fMRI study.
    Corradi-Dell'Acqua C; Civai C; Rumiati RI; Fink GR
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2013 Apr; 8(4):424-31. PubMed ID: 22287263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Negative incidental emotions augment fairness sensitivity.
    Liu C; Chai JW; Yu R
    Sci Rep; 2016 Apr; 6():24892. PubMed ID: 27101931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Social exclusion modulates fairness consideration in the ultimatum game: an ERP study.
    Qu C; Wang Y; Huang Y
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2013; 7():505. PubMed ID: 23986686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.