111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23294019)
1. One quantitative trait locus for intra- and interspecific variation in a sex pheromone.
Groot AT; Staudacher H; Barthel A; Inglis O; Schöfl G; Santangelo RG; Gebauer-Jung S; Vogel H; Emerson J; Schal C; Heckel DG; Gould F
Mol Ecol; 2013 Feb; 22(4):1065-80. PubMed ID: 23294019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. QTL analysis of sex pheromone blend differences between two closely related moths: Insights into divergence in biosynthetic pathways.
Groot AT; Estock ML; Horovitz JL; Hamilton J; Santangelo RG; Schal C; Gould F
Insect Biochem Mol Biol; 2009 Aug; 39(8):568-77. PubMed ID: 19477278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Genetics of sex pheromone blend differences between Heliothis virescens and Heliothis subflexa: a chromosome mapping approach.
Sheck AL; Groot AT; Ward CM; Gemeno C; Wang J; Brownie C; Schal C; Gould F
J Evol Biol; 2006 Mar; 19(2):600-17. PubMed ID: 16599935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Introgressing pheromone QTL between species: towards an evolutionary understanding of differentiation in sexual communication.
Groot AT; Ward C; Wang J; Pokrzywa A; O'Brien J; Bennett J; Kelly J; Santangelo RG; Schal C; Gould F
J Chem Ecol; 2004 Dec; 30(12):2495-514. PubMed ID: 15724967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Inheritance of olfactory preferences I. Pheromone-mediated behavioral responses of Heliothis subflexa x Heliothis virescens hybrid male moths.
Vickers NJ
Brain Behav Evol; 2006; 68(2):63-74. PubMed ID: 16707860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Inheritance of olfactory preferences III. Processing of pheromonal signals in the antennal lobe of Heliothis subflexa x Heliothis virescens hybrid male moths.
Vickers NJ
Brain Behav Evol; 2006; 68(2):90-108. PubMed ID: 16707862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Differential expression of odorant receptor genes involved in the sexual isolation of two Heliothis moths.
Vásquez GM; Fischer P; Grozinger CM; Gould F
Insect Mol Biol; 2011 Feb; 20(1):115-24. PubMed ID: 20946534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Within-population variability in a moth sex pheromone blend: genetic basis and behavioural consequences.
Groot AT; Schöfl G; Inglis O; Donnerhacke S; Classen A; Schmalz A; Santangelo RG; Emerson J; Gould F; Schal C; Heckel DG
Proc Biol Sci; 2014 Mar; 281(1779):20133054. PubMed ID: 24500170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sexual isolation of male moths explained by a single pheromone response QTL containing four receptor genes.
Gould F; Estock M; Hillier NK; Powell B; Groot AT; Ward CM; Emerson JL; Schal C; Vickers NJ
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2010 May; 107(19):8660-5. PubMed ID: 20404144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Inheritance of olfactory preferences II. Olfactory receptor neuron responses from Heliothis subflexa x Heliothis virescens hybrid male moths.
Baker TC; Quero C; Ochieng' SA; Vickers NJ
Brain Behav Evol; 2006; 68(2):75-89. PubMed ID: 16707861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Differential attraction of Heliothis subflexa males to synthetic pheromone lures in Eastern US and Western Mexico.
Groot AT; Santangelo RG; Ricci E; Brownie C; Gould F; Schal C
J Chem Ecol; 2007 Feb; 33(2):353-68. PubMed ID: 17200888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Lipases and carboxylesterases affect moth sex pheromone compounds involved in interspecific mate recognition.
de Fouchier A; Fruitet E; Lievers R; Kuperus P; Emerson J; Gould F; Heckel DG; Groot AT
Nat Commun; 2023 Nov; 14(1):7505. PubMed ID: 37980401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Experimental evidence for interspecific directional selection on moth pheromone communication.
Groot AT; Horovitz JL; Hamilton J; Santangelo RG; Schal C; Gould F
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2006 Apr; 103(15):5858-63. PubMed ID: 16585529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Genetic differentiation across North America in the generalist moth Heliothis virescens and the specialist H. subflexa.
Groot AT; Classen A; Inglis O; Blanco CA; López J; Téran Vargas A; Schal C; Heckel DG; Schöfl G
Mol Ecol; 2011 Jul; 20(13):2676-92. PubMed ID: 21615579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Genetic Basis of Pheromone Evolution in Moths.
Groot AT; Dekker T; Heckel DG
Annu Rev Entomol; 2016; 61():99-117. PubMed ID: 26565898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Phenotypic plasticity in sexual communication signal of a noctuid moth.
Groot AT; Classen A; Staudacher A; Schal C; Heckel DG
J Evol Biol; 2010 Dec; 23(12):2731-8. PubMed ID: 21121086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Geographic and temporal variation in moth chemical communication.
Groot AT; Inglis O; Bowdridge S; Santangelo RG; Blanco C; López JD; Vargas AT; Gould F; Schal C
Evolution; 2009 Aug; 63(8):1987-2003. PubMed ID: 19473383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fine-scale genetic analysis of species-specific female preference in Drosophila simulans.
Laturney M; Moehring AJ
J Evol Biol; 2012 Sep; 25(9):1718-31. PubMed ID: 22694106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Functional characterization of pheromone receptors in the tobacco budworm Heliothis virescens.
Wang G; Vásquez GM; Schal C; Zwiebel LJ; Gould F
Insect Mol Biol; 2011 Feb; 20(1):125-33. PubMed ID: 20946532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantitative Trait Locus Analysis of Mating Behavior and Male Sex Pheromones in Nasonia Wasps.
Diao W; Mousset M; Horsburgh GJ; Vermeulen CJ; Johannes F; van de Zande L; Ritchie MG; Schmitt T; Beukeboom LW
G3 (Bethesda); 2016 Jun; 6(6):1549-62. PubMed ID: 27172207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
