These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23294254)

  • 1. Analysing 2 × 2 contingency tables: which test is best?
    Ludbrook J
    Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol; 2013 Mar; 40(3):177-80. PubMed ID: 23294254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analysis of 2 x 2 tables of frequencies: matching test to experimental design.
    Ludbrook J
    Int J Epidemiol; 2008 Dec; 37(6):1430-5. PubMed ID: 18710887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Power comparison of two-sided exact tests for association in 2 x 2 contingency tables using standard, mid p and randomized test versions.
    Lydersen S; Laake P
    Stat Med; 2003 Dec; 22(24):3859-71. PubMed ID: 14673943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Chi 2 tests: how useful are they in the analysis of medical research data?
    Osborn JF
    Ann Ig; 1989; 1(3-4):417-32. PubMed ID: 2483622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. More enlightenment on the essence of applying Fisher's Exact test when testing for statistical significance using small sample data presented in a 2 x 2 table.
    Kangave D
    West Afr J Med; 1992; 11(3):179-84. PubMed ID: 1476961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Recommended tests for association in 2 x 2 tables.
    Lydersen S; Fagerland MW; Laake P
    Stat Med; 2009 Mar; 28(7):1159-75. PubMed ID: 19170020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Resampling programs for multiway contingency tables with fixed marginal frequency totals.
    Mielke PW; Berry KJ; Johnston JE
    Psychol Rep; 2007 Aug; 101(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 17958101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Distribution of odds ratio in 2 × 2 contingency table: adjustment for correlation.
    Biswas A; Hwang JS
    J Biopharm Stat; 2011 Jan; 21(1):136-50. PubMed ID: 21191860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Formulae and tables for the determination of sample sizes and power in clinical trials for testing differences in proportions for the two-sample design: a review.
    Sahai H; Khurshid A
    Stat Med; 1996 Jan; 15(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 8614740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biostatistics Series Module 4: Comparing Groups - Categorical Variables.
    Hazra A; Gogtay N
    Indian J Dermatol; 2016; 61(4):385-92. PubMed ID: 27512183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On analysis of epidemiological data involving a 2 x 2 contingency table: an overview of Fisher's exact test and Yates' correction for continuity.
    Sahai H; Khurshid A
    J Biopharm Stat; 1995 Mar; 5(1):43-70. PubMed ID: 7613560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Tests for the homogeneity of two binomial proportions in extremely unbalanced 2 x 2 contingency tables.
    Kang SH; Ahn CW
    Stat Med; 2008 Jun; 27(14):2524-35. PubMed ID: 17847031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Conditional and Unconditional Tests (and Sample Size) Based on Multiple Comparisons for Stratified 2 × 2 Tables.
    Martín Andrés A; Herranz Tejedor I; Álvarez Hernández M
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2015; 2015():147038. PubMed ID: 26075012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A free gift: an adaptive strategy in a single-arm trial using an exact test through the binomial distribution.
    Wang J
    J Biopharm Stat; 2012; 22(6):1127-36. PubMed ID: 23075012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A revisit to contingency table and tests of independence: bootstrap is preferred to Chi-square approximations as well as Fisher's exact test.
    Lin JJ; Chang CH; Pal N
    J Biopharm Stat; 2015; 25(3):438-58. PubMed ID: 24905809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. 2 X 2 tables.
    Brown GW
    Am J Dis Child; 1985 Apr; 139(4):410-6. PubMed ID: 3883750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A discussion on significance indices for contingency tables under small sample sizes.
    Oliveira NL; Pereira CAB; Diniz MA; Polpo A
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0199102. PubMed ID: 30071022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multiway contingency tables: Monte Carlo resampling probability values for the chi-squared and likelihood-ratio tests.
    Long MA; Berry KJ; Mielke PW
    Psychol Rep; 2010 Oct; 107(2):501-10. PubMed ID: 21117477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. New tests for null hypothesis of non unity ratio of proportions.
    Koti KM
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(2):229-45. PubMed ID: 17365220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Issues in biomedical statistics: analysing 2 x 2 tables of frequencies.
    Ludbrook J; Dudley H
    Aust N Z J Surg; 1994 Nov; 64(11):780-7. PubMed ID: 7945088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.